|
Course title |
German Idealism |
|
Semester |
109-1 |
|
Designated for |
COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY |
|
Instructor |
PONG WEN-BERNG |
|
Curriculum Number |
Phl3072 |
|
Curriculum Identity Number |
104 42100 |
|
Class |
|
|
Credits |
3.0 |
|
Full/Half
Yr. |
Half |
|
Required/
Elective |
Elective |
|
Time |
Monday 2,3,4(9:10~12:10) |
|
Remarks |
The upper limit of the number of students: 64. |
|
Ceiba Web Server |
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1091Phl3072_ |
|
Course introduction video |
|
|
Table of Core Capabilities and Curriculum Planning |
Table of Core Capabilities and Curriculum Planning |
|
Course Syllabus
|
|
Please respect the intellectual property rights of others and do not copy any of the course information without permission
|
|
Course Description |
在十八世紀末到十九世紀初，也就是以康德的第一批判出版的1781年到黑格爾死的那一年1831年為止，在歐陸的德語世界曾出現一個哲學史上的黃金時代，我們稱之為「德國觀念論」(German Idealism)，除了康德和黑格爾兩個重要的里程碑之外，在兩個巨人之間也曾存在著釵h具有原創性見解的哲學家，例如：Jacobi, Fichte, Herder, Hamann, Reinhold, Schleiermacher, Schelling, Schiller, Maimon, Schlegel, Novalis, Hoelderlin, Humbolt。兩百年來研究這一個時期的德國哲學發展的學者，有釵h分歧的看法，有一派主張這個傳統應該按照以下的譜系：Kant-Fichte-Schelling-Hegel，而以黑格爾為集其大成者?R. Kroner 1921?，有另一派的主張是按同樣的譜系，但真正的哲學系統仍然是Kant，他之後的哲學發展是錯的?新康德學派: 回到康德?。最近幾十年以來由德國學者Dieter Henrich所提出的新的看法是以費希特的意識哲學為中心轉向賀德林的哲學，最後又總結於黑格爾的邏輯學，根據Henrich的看法，這個時期的研究必須採取更開放的態度，他認為，在理論的證成上，有三個理論模式仍不能蓋棺論定孰是孰非，即晚年的康德，費希特的後期知識學，以及黑格爾的邏輯學。本課程擬討論Henrich 2003年Between Kant and Hegel一書中所列的一些在Kant和Hegel之間出現重要的哲學家，Jacobi, Reinhold, Maimon, Schulze, Fichte, Hoelderlin，另外在加上書中未討論的Schelling。
|
|
Course Objective |
(1)介紹康德到黑格爾的發展(2)介紹對這些哲學家不同的詮釋
|
|
Course Requirement |
本課程為大學部之課程，以演講為主，以討論為輔，其間包含期中與期末考兩次考試。
|
|
Student Workload (expected study time outside of class per week) |
|
|
Office Hours |
Thu. 14:00~16:00 |
|
References |
Kroner, R.: Von Kant bis Hegel, Tuebingen 1921.
Dieter Henrich: The Course of Remembrance and Other Essays
on Hoelderlin, ed. E. Foerster, Stanford University Press
1997
: Between Kant and Hegel, Harvard University Press 2003
George di Giovanni(ed.): Between Kant and Hegel: texts in
the development of post-Kantian Idealism. trans. and
annotated by George di Giovanni and H.S. Harris; with two
essays by the translator, Albany: State University of New
York Press 1985.
Behler, E.(ed.): Fichte, Jacobi and Schelling: Philosophy
of German Idealism, New York 1985.
Beiser, F.: The Fate of Reason: German Philosophy from
Kant to Fichte. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press
1987
Breazeale, D.: “Between Kant and Fichte: Karl Leonard
Reinhold's Elementary Philosophy’”, Review of
Metaphysics 35: 785-822, 1982.
Heidegger, M.: Der deutsche Idealismus (Fichte, Schelling,
Hegel) und die philosophische Problemlage der Gegenwart.
Frankfurt: Klostermann 1997.
Sydgwick, S. (ed.): The Reception of Kant’s Critical
Philosophy: Fichte, Schelling, and Hegel. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press 2000.
Solomon, R. and Higgins, K: The Age of German Idealism,
London and New York: Routeledge 1993.
Fichte J.G. : Science of Knowlege, trans. and ed. by P.
Heath and J. Lachs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
1982
Hoelderling, F..: “Judgement and Being”: in Friedrich
Hoelderlin: Essays and Letters on Theory. Trans. and ed.
by Thoams Pfau. Albany: SUNY Press, 1988, pp. 37-38.
Jacobi, F.: The Main Philosophical Writings and the Novel
Allwill, trans. G. di Giovanni, Montreal and Kingston,
London, Buffalo, NY: McGill-Queen’s University Press
1994.
Maimon, S.: Versuch ueber die Transzendentalphilosophie
mit einem Anhang ueber die symbolische Erkenntnis und
Anmerkungen, Heideberg: G. Olm 1965.
Reinhold, K.L.: Versuch einer neuen Theorie des
menschlichen Vorstellungsvermoegens. Prague and Jena:
Widtmann and Mauke 1789. Reprint, Darmstadt:
Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft 1963.
Schelling, F.W..J: System des transzendentalen Idealismus,
Hamburg: Meiner 1992.
中文：
關子尹：《論康德與黑格爾》，克隆納著，關子尹編譯，(台北：聯
經，民國74年)
|
|
Designated reading |
|
|
Grading |
|
|