課程資訊
課程名稱
知識論
Epistemology 
開課學期
106-1 
授課對象
文學院  哲學系  
授課教師
梁益堉 
課號
Phl2063 
課程識別碼
104 47300 
班次
 
學分
3.0 
全/半年
半年 
必/選修
必帶 
上課時間
星期二2,3,4,5(9:10~13:10) 
上課地點
水源階梯201 
備註
本課程中文授課,使用英文教科書。
總人數上限:80人 
Ceiba 課程網頁
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1061Phl2063_Episte 
課程簡介影片
 
核心能力關聯
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖
課程大綱
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
課程概述

哲學與其他學科不同處之一,在於後者是研究個別領域的知識,而前者是研究人類知識的本質、來源、限制、人是否真能獲得知識、和知識系統的結構。這些都是知識論所關心的主題。本課程幫助同學們認識基本的知識論問題和彼此的關聯,並從事嚴謹的理性思維。我們將依序討論下列議題:
One major difference between philosophy and other disciplines is that, while the latter studies particular areas of knowledge, the former focuses on human knowledge as a whole. Epistemology is concerned with the essence, origins, limits, and structures of knowledge. We will discuss the following topics:
1. Descartes’ Epistemology
2. The Standard Analysis
3. The Problem of Induction
4. A Priori Justification and Knowledge
5. Agrippa’s Trilemma
6. Experience and Reality
7. Foundationalism and Coherentism
8. Internalism and Externalism
9. Evidence and Entitlement
10. Knowledge in Context
11. Seeing and Knowing
12. Scepticism and Epistemic Priority
13. Self-knowledge
14. Privileged Access
15. Theories of self-awareness
 

課程目標
1. 引領學生了解並思考當代知識論的重要議題。
2. 提昇學生哲學閱讀及寫作能力。

說明:本課程設計重在幫助同學認識重要的知識論問題和彼此的關聯,並從事嚴謹的理性思維,培養獨立思考問題的能力。實際作法包括:(1)在上課時對各個哲學議題做較深入的討論,鼓勵學生發問。(2)培養學生獨立閱讀英文哲學作品的能力。這包括如何掌握一篇哲學文章的結構,瞭解各章節之間的關聯,釐清論證的結構與預設,欣賞並評估論證之強弱。(3)幫助學生認識寫作對哲學思考的重要性,並增進哲學寫作的實力。除以上各點之外,還更進一步鼓勵同學:(4)花功夫研讀困難的哲學作品,評估各種立場的論證,嘗試做有用的區分。(5)也要在作業中提出自己的觀點,並加以辯護,培養學生獨立建構論證的能力。
 
課程要求
1. Students are required to finish the weekly reading assignment before each class. You will spend significant time in reading and thinking each week. In this course, you are expected to make efforts to read the texts closely, think critically, and write clearly. Hopefully, your efforts will be intellectually rewarding.
2. Those who miss 3 classes, Mid-term Exam, or Final Exam will be failed.
 
預期每週課後學習時數
 
Office Hours
 
指定閱讀
待補 
參考書目
指定用書:
1. Michael Williams, Problems of Knowledge: a Critical Introduction to Epistemology, Oxford University Press, 2001.
2. Laurence BonJour, Epistemology: Classic Problems and Contemporary Responses, Rowman & Littlefield Publisher Inc., 2002.
3. Brie Gertler, Self-Knowledge, Routledge, 2011.
參考用書:
1. Richard Feldman, Epistemology, Prentice Hall, 2003.
2. Michael Huemer, Skepticism and the Veil of Perception, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 2001.
3. Matthias Steup and Ernest Sosa (eds.) Contemporary Debates in Epistemology, Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 2005.
 
評量方式
(僅供參考)
   
課程進度
週次
日期
單元主題
第1週
9/12  Descartes, First and Second Meditation 
第2週
9/19  Williams, Ch. 1: 15 ~ 25, Ch. 2: 28 ~ 29, 31
 
第3週
9/26  BonJour, Ch. 2: 21 ~ 22, Ch. 3: 35, 37 ~ 41
<br/>
Homework 1: (1) What is the Gettier problem for the Standard Analysis of Knowledge? Give an example of this problem. (2) How would you respond to it? 
第4週
10/03  Williams, Problems of Knowledge, Ch. 5
<br/>
Homework 2: (1) What is Agrippan skepticism? Give an example to illustrate the problem. (2) Can it be solved? If yes, how? If not, why?
 
第5週
10/10  國慶日 
第6週
10/17  Williams, Problems of Knowledge, Ch. 6
<br/>
Homework 3: (1) What is Cartesian skepticism about empirical knowledge? Explain why it can be considered as general, radical and intuitive. (2) Do you agree with these characterizations of Cartesian skepticism? Why?
 
第7週
10/24  BonJour, Ch. 4: 47 ~ 57,
BonJour, Ch. 5: 71 ~ 74, 79 ~ 81, 87 ~ 89
 
第8週
10/31  Midterm Exam 
第9週
11/07  Jennifer Windt's talk 
第10週
11/14  BonJour, Epistemology, Ch. 6
 
第11週
11/21  BonJour, Epistemology, Ch. 9

Homework 4: What is the Cartesian view about the immediacy of experience? Is it correct? Why?

Homework 5:(1) What is coherentism about the structure of justification? (2) Do you agree with this theory? Why? 
第12週
11/28  BonJour, Epistemology, Ch. 10

Homework 6: What is externalism about justification? Present an argument against externalism. According to your view, can externalism be defended?
 
第13週
12/05  東西哲學匯通研討會 
第14週
12/12  Williams, Problems of Knowledge, Ch. 13

Homework 7: (1) How does Williams respond to Agrippan skepticism? (2) Do you agree with his response? Why?

 
第15週
12/19  Williams, Problems of Knowledge, Ch. 14

Homework 8: Is it correct that justification is subject to intelligibility or methodological constraints? Give an example to support your position. 
第16週
12/26  Williams, Problems of Knowledge, Ch. 15

Homework 9: (1) According to Sellars, what is the nature of observational knowledge? (2) Do you agree with him? Why?
 
第17週
1/02  Williams, Problems of Knowledge, Ch. 16