|
課程資訊 |
|
課程名稱 |
資訊計量學導論 INTRODUCTION TO INFORMETRICS | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
開課學期 |
98-2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
授課對象 |
文學院 圖書資訊學系 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
授課教師 |
黃慕萱 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
課號 |
LIS5009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
課程識別碼 |
106 50700 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
班次 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
學分 |
2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
全/半年 |
半年 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
必/選修 |
選修 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
上課時間 |
星期一3,4(10:20~12:10) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
上課地點 |
圖資會議室 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
備註 |
總人數上限：17人 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
課程簡介影片 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
核心能力關聯 |
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
課程大綱
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
課程概述 |
-- | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
課程目標 |
1. 讓學生了解資訊計量學之研究範圍
2. 讓學生了解資訊計量學之重要定理 3. 讓學生了解資訊計量學在評鑑角度上之應用 4. 讓學生了解期刊文獻與專利文獻之個別特性 5. 讓學生了解專利計量學與網路計量學之研究內容與應用成果 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
課程要求 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
預期每週課後學習時數 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Office Hours |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
參考書目 |
【文獻成長】
Egghe, L., & Ravichandra Rao, I. K. (1992). Classification of growth models based on growth rates and its applications. Scientometrics, 25(1), 5-46. Egghe, L. (2005). An explanation of disproportionate growth using linear 3-dimensional informetrics and its relation with the fractal dimension. Scientometrics, 63(2), 277-296. Gupta, B. M. (1998). Growth and obsolescence of literature in theoretical population genetics. Scientometrics, 42(3), 335-347. Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens III, W. W. (1972). The Limits to Growth (chap. 1-2, relating to growth phenomena). New York: Universal Books. de Queiroz, G. G., Lancaster, F. W., & Queiroz, G. G. (1981). Growth, dispersion and obsolescence of the literature: A case study in thermoluminescent dosimetry. Journal of Research Communication Studies, 2(4), 203-217. 蔡明月（民86）。文獻成長現象。中國圖書館學會會報，59，135-153。 【布萊德福定律】 Bookstein, A. (2005). Towards a multi-disciplinary Bradford law. Scientometrics, 30(1), 353-361. Coleman, S. R. (1994). Disciplinary variables that affect the shape of Bradford's bibliography. Scientometrics, 29(1), 59-81. Drott, M. G. (1981). Bradford's law. Library Trends, 30(l), 41-52. Eto, H. (1988). Rising tail in Bradford distribution: Its interpretation and application. Scientometrics, 13(5-6), 271-287. Garfield, E. (1977). Bradford's law. Essays of an Information Scientist, 4, 476-483. 蔡明月（民87）。布萊德福定律。資訊傳播與圖書館學，5(2)，25-49。 【洛卡定律】 Allison, P. D., Price, D. de S., Griffth, B. C., Moravesik, M. J., & Stewart, J. A. (1976). Lotka’s law: A problem in its interpretation and application. Social Studies of Science, 6, 269-276. Egghe, L. (2004). The source-item coverage of the Lotka function. Scientometrics, 61(1), 103-115. Egghe, L. (2005). Relations between the continuous and the discrete Lotka power function. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(7), 664-668. Kretschmer, H., & Kretschmer, T. (2007). Lotka's distribution and distribution of co-author pairs' frequencies. Journal of Informetrics, 1(4), 308-377. Rai, L. P., & Kumar, N. (2005). A rationale for Lotka's Law: An examination of empirical data. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 52(3), 103-107. 蔡明月（民88）。洛卡定律（Lotka's Law）與作者生產力。中國圖書館學會會報，62，57-75。 【齊夫定律】 Egghe, L. (2005). Zipfian and Lotkaian continuous concentration theory. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(9), 935-945. Izsak, J. (2006). Some practical aspects of fitting and testing the Zipf-Mandelbrot model: A short essay. Scientometrics, 67(1), 107-120. Semboloni, F. (2008). Hierarchy, cities size distribution and Zipf's law. European Physical Journal B, 63(3), 295-301. Shan, S. (2005). On the generalized Zipf distribution. Part I. Information Processing & Management, 41(6), 1369-1386. 蔡明月（民88）。齊夫定律。教育資料與圖書館學，37(2)，165-183。 【文獻老化】 Egghe, L. (2004). Solution of a problem of Buckland on the influence of obsolescence on scattering. Scientometrics, 59(2), 225-232. Lariviere, V., Archambault, E., & Gingras, Y. (2008). Long-term variations in the aging of scientific literature: From exponential growth to steady-state science (1900-2004). Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(2), 288-296. Starr, S., & Wifflams, J. (2008). The long tail: a usage analysis of pre-1993 print biomedical journal literature. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 96(1), 20-27. Tonta, Y., & Al, U. (2005). Scatter of journals and literature obsolescence reflected in document delivery requests. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(1), 84-94. 【引文分析】 Bonzi, S. (1982). Characteristics of a literature as predictors of relatedness between cited and citing works. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 33, 208-216. Broadus, R. (1977). The application of citation analyses. Advances in Librarianship, 7, 299-335. Leydesdorff, L. (1998). Theories of citation? Scientometrics, 43(1), 5-25. Nicolaisen, J. (2007). Citation analysis. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41, 609-641. Zhao, D. Z., & Strotmann, A. (2008). Comparing all-author and first-author co-citation analyses of information science. Journal of Informetrics, 2(3), 229-239. 【引用限制】 Garfield, E. (1985). Uses and misuses of citation frequency. Current Contents, 43, 3-9. Kostoff, R. N. (1998). The use and misuse of citation analysis in research evaluation. Scientometrics, 43(1), 27-43. MacRoberts, M. H., & MacRoberts, B. R. (1996). Problems of citation analysis. Scientometrics, 36(3), 435-444. Van Raan, A. F. J. (2005). Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 62(1), 133-143. 【期刊評鑑】 Bonitz, M. (1985). Journal ranking by selective impact. New method based on SDI results and journal impact factors. Scientometrics, 7, 471-485. Coleman, A. (2007). Assessing the value of a journal beyond the impact factor. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(8), 1148-1161. Harter, S. P., & Nisonger, T. E. (1997). ISI's impact factor as misnomer: A proposed new measure to assess journal impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(12), 1146-1148. Moed, H. F., Van Leeuwen, T. N., & Reedijk, J. (1999). Towards appropriate indicators of journal impact. Scientometrics, 46(3), 575-589. Van Leeuwen, T. N., Moed, H. F., & Reedijk, J. (1999). Critical comments on Institute for Scientific Information impact factors: A sample of inorganic molecular chemistry journals. Journal of Information Science, 25(6), 489-498. 【合著研究】 Egghe, L. (1991). Theory of collaboration and collaborative measures. Information Processing and Management, 27(2-3), 177-202. Lariviere, V., Gingras, Y., & Archambault, E. (2006). Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities. Scientometrics, 68(3), 519-533. Smart, J. C., & Bayer, A. E. (1986). Author collaboration and impact: A note on citation rates of single and multiple authored articles. Scientometrics, 10(5-6), 297-305. Yoshikane, F., Nozawa, T., & Tsuji, K. (2006). Comparative analysis of co-authorship networks considering authors' roles in collaboration: Differences between the theoretical and application areas. Scientometrics, 68(3), 643-655. 【自我引用】 Fowler, J. H., & Aksnes, D. W. (2007). Does self-citation pay? Scientometrics, 72(3), 427-437. Glanzel, W., Thijs, B., & Schlemmer, B. (2004). A bibliometric approach to the role of author self-citations in scientific communication. Scientometrics, 59(1), 63-77. Lawani, S. M. (1982). On the heterogeneity and classification of author self-citations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 33, 281-284. Snyder, H., & Bonzi, S. (1998). Patterns of self-citation cross disciplines (1980-1989). Journal of Information Science, 24(6), 431-435. van Raan, A. F. J. (2008). Self-citation as an impact-reinforcing mechanism in the science system. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(10), 1631-1643. 【學術傳播】 Bauer, K., & Bakkalbasi, N. (2005). An examination of citation counts in a new scholarly communication environment. D-Lib Magazine, 11(9). Retrieved November 27, 2008, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september05/bauer/09bauer.html. Borgman, C. L., & Jonathan, F. (2002). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36, 3-72. Lindholm-Romantschuk, Y., & Warner, J. (1996). The role of monographs in scholarly communication: An empirical study of philosophy, sociology and economics. Journal of Documentation, 52(4), 389-404. Russell, J. M. (2001). Scientific communication at the beginning of the twenty-first century. International Social Science Journal, 53(2), 271-282. 蔡明月（民86）。學術傳播與書目計量學。教育資料與圖書館學，35(1)，38-57。 【專利計量】 Callaert, J., Van Looy, B., Verbeek, A., Debackere, K., & Thus, B. (2006). Traces of prior art: an analysis of non-patent references found in patent documents. Scientometrics, 69(1), 3-20. Clark, C. V. (1976). Obsolescence of the patent literature. Journal of Documentation, 32(1), 32-52. Leydesdorff, L. (2004). The university-industry knowledge relationship: Analyzing patents and the science base of technologies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(11), 991-1001. Narin, F. (1994). Patent bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 30(1), 147-155. 【網路計量】 Alimohammadi, D. (2006 ). Webliometrics: a new horizon in information research. Library Review, 55(6), 344-348. Bjorneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2004).Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14), 1216-1227. Sen, B. K. (2004). Cybermetrics: meaning, definition, scope and constituents. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 51(3), 116-120. Thelwall, M., & Vaughan, L. (2004). Webometrics: an introduction to the special issue. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14), 1213-1215. | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
指定閱讀 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
評量方式 (僅供參考) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
課程進度 |
|
週次 |
日期 |
單元主題 |
|
第1週 |
2/22 | 課程簡介 |
|
第2週 |
3/01 | 資訊計量學研究範圍 |
|
第3週 |
3/08 | 文獻成長 |
|
第4週 |
3/15 | 布萊德福定律（Bradford's law） |
|
第5週 |
3/22 | 洛卡定律（Lotka's law） |
|
第6週 |
3/29 | 齊夫定律（Zipf's law） |
|
第7週 |
4/05 | 文獻老化 |
|
第8週 |
4/12 | 引文分析 |
|
第9週 |
4/19 | 書目耦合（Bibliographic coupling）和共被引（Co-citation） |
|
第10週 |
4/26 | 期刊評鑑 |
|
第11週 |
5/03 | 合著研究與自我引用 |
|
第12週 |
5/10 | 學術傳播 |
|
第13週 |
5/17 | 專利導論 |
|
第14週 |
5/24 | 專利指標 |
|
第15週 |
5/31 | 專利計量應用 |
|
第16週 |
6/07 | 網路計量學導論 |
|
第17週 |
6/14 | 網路計量理論與實證 |
|
第18週 |
6/21 | 網路計量應用 |