課程資訊
課程名稱
資訊計量學導論
INTRODUCTION TO INFORMETRICS 
開課學期
98-2 
授課對象
文學院  圖書資訊學系  
授課教師
黃慕萱 
課號
LIS5009 
課程識別碼
106 50700 
班次
 
學分
全/半年
半年 
必/選修
選修 
上課時間
星期一3,4(10:20~12:10) 
上課地點
圖資會議室 
備註
總人數上限:17人 
 
課程簡介影片
 
核心能力關聯
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖
課程大綱
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
課程概述

-- 

課程目標
1. 讓學生了解資訊計量學之研究範圍
2. 讓學生了解資訊計量學之重要定理
3. 讓學生了解資訊計量學在評鑑角度上之應用
4. 讓學生了解期刊文獻與專利文獻之個別特性
5. 讓學生了解專利計量學與網路計量學之研究內容與應用成果
 
課程要求
 
預期每週課後學習時數
 
Office Hours
 
參考書目
【文獻成長】
Egghe, L., & Ravichandra Rao, I. K. (1992). Classification of growth models based on growth rates and its applications. Scientometrics, 25(1), 5-46.
Egghe, L. (2005). An explanation of disproportionate growth using linear 3-dimensional informetrics and its relation with the fractal dimension. Scientometrics, 63(2), 277-296.
Gupta, B. M. (1998). Growth and obsolescence of literature in theoretical population genetics. Scientometrics, 42(3), 335-347.
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens III, W. W. (1972). The Limits to Growth (chap. 1-2, relating to growth phenomena). New York: Universal Books.
de Queiroz, G. G., Lancaster, F. W., & Queiroz, G. G. (1981). Growth, dispersion and obsolescence of the literature: A case study in thermoluminescent dosimetry. Journal of Research Communication Studies, 2(4), 203-217.
蔡明月(民86)。文獻成長現象。中國圖書館學會會報,59,135-153。

【布萊德福定律】
Bookstein, A. (2005). Towards a multi-disciplinary Bradford law. Scientometrics, 30(1), 353-361.
Coleman, S. R. (1994). Disciplinary variables that affect the shape of Bradford's bibliography. Scientometrics, 29(1), 59-81.
Drott, M. G. (1981). Bradford's law. Library Trends, 30(l), 41-52.
Eto, H. (1988). Rising tail in Bradford distribution: Its interpretation and application. Scientometrics, 13(5-6), 271-287.
Garfield, E. (1977). Bradford's law. Essays of an Information Scientist, 4, 476-483.
蔡明月(民87)。布萊德福定律。資訊傳播與圖書館學,5(2),25-49。

【洛卡定律】
Allison, P. D., Price, D. de S., Griffth, B. C., Moravesik, M. J., & Stewart, J. A. (1976). Lotka’s law: A problem in its interpretation and application. Social Studies of Science, 6, 269-276.
Egghe, L. (2004). The source-item coverage of the Lotka function. Scientometrics, 61(1), 103-115.
Egghe, L. (2005). Relations between the continuous and the discrete Lotka power function. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(7), 664-668.
Kretschmer, H., & Kretschmer, T. (2007). Lotka's distribution and distribution of co-author pairs' frequencies. Journal of Informetrics, 1(4), 308-377.
Rai, L. P., & Kumar, N. (2005). A rationale for Lotka's Law: An examination of empirical data. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 52(3), 103-107.
蔡明月(民88)。洛卡定律(Lotka's Law)與作者生產力。中國圖書館學會會報,62,57-75。

【齊夫定律】
Egghe, L. (2005). Zipfian and Lotkaian continuous concentration theory. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(9), 935-945.
Izsak, J. (2006). Some practical aspects of fitting and testing the Zipf-Mandelbrot model: A short essay. Scientometrics, 67(1), 107-120.
Semboloni, F. (2008). Hierarchy, cities size distribution and Zipf's law. European Physical Journal B, 63(3), 295-301.
Shan, S. (2005). On the generalized Zipf distribution. Part I. Information Processing & Management, 41(6), 1369-1386.
蔡明月(民88)。齊夫定律。教育資料與圖書館學,37(2),165-183。

【文獻老化】
Egghe, L. (2004). Solution of a problem of Buckland on the influence of obsolescence on scattering. Scientometrics, 59(2), 225-232.
Lariviere, V., Archambault, E., & Gingras, Y. (2008). Long-term variations in the aging of scientific literature: From exponential growth to steady-state science (1900-2004). Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(2), 288-296.
Starr, S., & Wifflams, J. (2008). The long tail: a usage analysis of pre-1993 print biomedical journal literature. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 96(1), 20-27.
Tonta, Y., & Al, U. (2005). Scatter of journals and literature obsolescence reflected in document delivery requests. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(1), 84-94.

【引文分析】
Bonzi, S. (1982). Characteristics of a literature as predictors of relatedness between cited and citing works. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 33, 208-216.
Broadus, R. (1977). The application of citation analyses. Advances in Librarianship, 7, 299-335.
Leydesdorff, L. (1998). Theories of citation? Scientometrics, 43(1), 5-25.
Nicolaisen, J. (2007). Citation analysis. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41, 609-641.
Zhao, D. Z., & Strotmann, A. (2008). Comparing all-author and first-author co-citation analyses of information science. Journal of Informetrics, 2(3), 229-239.

【引用限制】
Garfield, E. (1985). Uses and misuses of citation frequency. Current Contents, 43, 3-9.
Kostoff, R. N. (1998). The use and misuse of citation analysis in research evaluation. Scientometrics, 43(1), 27-43.
MacRoberts, M. H., & MacRoberts, B. R. (1996). Problems of citation analysis. Scientometrics, 36(3), 435-444.
Van Raan, A. F. J. (2005). Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 62(1), 133-143.

【期刊評鑑】
Bonitz, M. (1985). Journal ranking by selective impact. New method based on SDI results and journal impact factors. Scientometrics, 7, 471-485.
Coleman, A. (2007). Assessing the value of a journal beyond the impact factor. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(8), 1148-1161.
Harter, S. P., & Nisonger, T. E. (1997). ISI's impact factor as misnomer: A proposed new measure to assess journal impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(12), 1146-1148.
Moed, H. F., Van Leeuwen, T. N., & Reedijk, J. (1999). Towards appropriate indicators of journal impact. Scientometrics, 46(3), 575-589.
Van Leeuwen, T. N., Moed, H. F., & Reedijk, J. (1999). Critical comments on Institute for Scientific Information impact factors: A sample of inorganic molecular chemistry journals. Journal of Information Science, 25(6), 489-498.

【合著研究】
Egghe, L. (1991). Theory of collaboration and collaborative measures. Information Processing and Management, 27(2-3), 177-202.
Lariviere, V., Gingras, Y., & Archambault, E. (2006). Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities. Scientometrics, 68(3), 519-533.
Smart, J. C., & Bayer, A. E. (1986). Author collaboration and impact: A note on citation rates of single and multiple authored articles. Scientometrics, 10(5-6), 297-305.
Yoshikane, F., Nozawa, T., & Tsuji, K. (2006). Comparative analysis of co-authorship networks considering authors' roles in collaboration: Differences between the theoretical and application areas. Scientometrics, 68(3), 643-655.

【自我引用】
Fowler, J. H., & Aksnes, D. W. (2007). Does self-citation pay? Scientometrics, 72(3), 427-437.
Glanzel, W., Thijs, B., & Schlemmer, B. (2004). A bibliometric approach to the role of author self-citations in scientific communication. Scientometrics, 59(1), 63-77.
Lawani, S. M. (1982). On the heterogeneity and classification of author self-citations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 33, 281-284.
Snyder, H., & Bonzi, S. (1998). Patterns of self-citation cross disciplines (1980-1989). Journal of Information Science, 24(6), 431-435.
van Raan, A. F. J. (2008). Self-citation as an impact-reinforcing mechanism in the science system. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(10), 1631-1643.

【學術傳播】
Bauer, K., & Bakkalbasi, N. (2005). An examination of citation counts in a new scholarly communication environment. D-Lib Magazine, 11(9). Retrieved November 27, 2008, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september05/bauer/09bauer.html.
Borgman, C. L., & Jonathan, F. (2002). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36, 3-72.
Lindholm-Romantschuk, Y., & Warner, J. (1996). The role of monographs in scholarly communication: An empirical study of philosophy, sociology and economics. Journal of Documentation, 52(4), 389-404.
Russell, J. M. (2001). Scientific communication at the beginning of the twenty-first century. International Social Science Journal, 53(2), 271-282.
蔡明月(民86)。學術傳播與書目計量學。教育資料與圖書館學,35(1),38-57。

【專利計量】
Callaert, J., Van Looy, B., Verbeek, A., Debackere, K., & Thus, B. (2006). Traces of prior art: an analysis of non-patent references found in patent documents. Scientometrics, 69(1), 3-20.
Clark, C. V. (1976). Obsolescence of the patent literature. Journal of Documentation, 32(1), 32-52.
Leydesdorff, L. (2004). The university-industry knowledge relationship: Analyzing patents and the science base of technologies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(11), 991-1001.
Narin, F. (1994). Patent bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 30(1), 147-155.

【網路計量】
Alimohammadi, D. (2006 ). Webliometrics: a new horizon in information research. Library Review, 55(6), 344-348.
Bjorneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2004).Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14), 1216-1227.
Sen, B. K. (2004). Cybermetrics: meaning, definition, scope and constituents. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 51(3), 116-120.
Thelwall, M., & Vaughan, L. (2004). Webometrics: an introduction to the special issue. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14), 1213-1215.
 
指定閱讀
 
評量方式
(僅供參考)
 
No.
項目
百分比
說明
1. 
課堂參與 
10% 
 
2. 
作 業 
30% 
 
3. 
期 中 考 
30% 
 
4. 
期末考或期末作業 
30% 
 
 
課程進度
週次
日期
單元主題
第1週
2/22  課程簡介 
第2週
3/01  資訊計量學研究範圍 
第3週
3/08  文獻成長 
第4週
3/15  布萊德福定律(Bradford's law) 
第5週
3/22  洛卡定律(Lotka's law) 
第6週
3/29  齊夫定律(Zipf's law) 
第7週
4/05  文獻老化 
第8週
4/12  引文分析 
第9週
4/19  書目耦合(Bibliographic coupling)和共被引(Co-citation) 
第10週
4/26  期刊評鑑 
第11週
5/03  合著研究與自我引用 
第12週
5/10  學術傳播 
第13週
5/17  專利導論 
第14週
5/24  專利指標 
第15週
5/31  專利計量應用 
第16週
6/07  網路計量學導論 
第17週
6/14  網路計量理論與實證 
第18週
6/21  網路計量應用