課程名稱 |
宋代史學專題一 Seminar on Song Historiography(Ⅰ) |
開課學期 |
107-2 |
授課對象 |
文學院 歷史學研究所 |
授課教師 |
宋家復 |
課號 |
Hist7192 |
課程識別碼 |
123 M6800 |
班次 |
|
學分 |
3.0 |
全/半年 |
半年 |
必/選修 |
選修 |
上課時間 |
星期五2,3,4(9:10~12:10) |
上課地點 |
歷史研討室 |
備註 |
限碩士班以上 總人數上限:6人 |
Ceiba 課程網頁 |
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1072Hist7192_ |
課程簡介影片 |
|
核心能力關聯 |
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖 |
課程大綱
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
課程概述 |
123 U8430
這是一門研讀與討論宋代史學文獻的研究所課程,這學期將焦點聚焦於南宋初期。這份說明並不是標準意義下的課程大綱(syllabus),而是一份為第一次上課見面準備的邀請,邀請有興趣嚴肅閱讀、認真討論下面這些文獻(原始與二手)的博碩士班同學參與本課程。研究討論課(seminar)本來就是教師與同學們的一場共同實驗與冒險,其學習效率與成果端賴於所有參與者的志願與磨合。本課程進一步發揮這種開放精神,將採取以下述程序運作: |
課程目標 |
本課程並不預設修課者有超過一般通史程度的宋史知識,亦不須以宋代史學為立志專攻,只要具備中英文基本閱讀本事,願意精進磨練這份閱讀能力,有耐心與他人進行持續性的溝通對話,都歡迎加入我們宋代歷史文本世界的探險之旅。 |
課程要求 |
無期中考。期末作業是一篇6000-10000字書面報告,原則上以之前口頭報告為主題擴展而成,需包含現代研究成果回顧並搭配宋代文獻驗證,亦可轉換專書撰寫報告,惟均需事先諮詢教師同意。報告需以電腦打印於A4紙張,字型不得小於11,兩倍行距,留有適當邊界以便教師眉批,其他格式則依循自選期刊論文慣例,以全篇一致為原則。 |
預期每週課後學習時數 |
|
Office Hours |
另約時間 |
指定閱讀 |
梁啟超,〈史學史的做法〉
G. E. R. Lloyd, “Epilogue,” in Oxford History of Historical Writing, vol. I, ed. by Andrew Feldherr and Grant Hardy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 601-19.
Michel de Certeau, “The Historiographical Operation,” in The Writing of History, trans. by Tom Conley, New York: Columbia University Press, 1988, pp. 56-113.
皇王大紀
路史
通鑑綱目
通鑑敘事本末
讀史管見
東萊博議與大事記
續資治通鑑長編 |
參考書目 |
白壽彝主編, 《中國史學史》, vol.3, by瞿林東, 上海: 上海人民, 2006.
蔡崇榜, 《宋代修史制度研究》, 台北: 文津, 1991.
Robert M. Hartwell, “Historical Analogism, Public Policy, and Social Science in Eleventh- and Twelfth-Century China,” American Historical Review 76:3 971), pp. 690-727.
Thomas H. C. Lee, ed., The New and the Multiple: Sung Senses of the Past, Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press, 2004.
林平, ed., 《宋代史學編年》, 成都: 四川大學, 1994.
Naitō Torajirō 內藤虎次郎, 《支那史學史》, 《內藤湖南全集》, vol. 11, Tokyo: Chikuma shobō, 1969.
On-cho Ng and Edwad Wang, Mirroring the Past: the Writing and Use of History in Imperial China, Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2005.
Historians of China and Japan, ed. by W. G. Beasley & E. G. Pulleyblank, 1961.
瞿林東, 《中國史學史綱》, 北京出版社, 2000 (1999).
宋立民, 《宋代史官制度研究》, 長春: 吉林人民, 1999.
燕永成, 《南宋史學研究》, 蘭州: 甘肅人民, 2007.
楊翼驤, ed.,《中國史學史資料編年》, vol. 2, 天津: 南開大學, 1994.
Michel de Certeau, “The Historiographical Operation,” in The Writing of History, trans. by Tom Conley, New York: Columbia University Press, 1988, pp. 56-113.
Donald R. Kelley, Faces of History: Historical Inquiry from Herodotus to Herder, 1998, pp. ix-xii; “Preface,” Fortunes of History: Historical Inquiry from Herder to Huizinga, 2003.
Peter K. Bol, “When Antiquity Matters: Thinking about and with Antiquity in the Tang-Song Transition,” in Perceptions of Antiquity in Chinese Civilization, ed. by Dieter Kuhn and Helga Stahl, Heidelberg: edition forum, 2008, pp. 209-35.
Richard L. Davis, trans., Historical Records of the Five Dynasties, New York: Columbia University Press, 2004.
鄧小南, 《祖宗之法 -- 北宋前期政治述略》, 北京: 三聯, 2006.
Demerie Paula Faitler, Confucian Historiography and the Thought of Ssu-ma Kuang, Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Michigan, 1991.
Charles Hartman, “A Textual History of Cai Jing’s Biography in the Songshi,” in Emperor Huizong and Late Northern Song China: the Politics of Culture and the Culture of Politics, ed. by Patricia Buckley Ebrey and Maggie Bickford, Cambridge (Mass.) & London: Harvard University Asia Center and Harvard University Press, 2006, pp. 517-64.
Charles Hartman, “The Reluctant Historian: Sun Ti, Chu Hsi, and the Fall of Northern Sung,” T’oung Pao, Second Series, 89: 1/3 (2003), pp. 100-48.
Charles Hartman, “The Making of a Villain: Ch’in Kuei and Tao-hsüeh,” HJAS 58:1 (1998), pp. 59-146.
-----------------------, "SONG HISTORY NARRATIVES AS GRAND ALLEGORY," Journal of Chinese History (2018), 1-23.
Jan Yün-hua, “The Fo-tsu-t’ung-chi, a Biographical and Bibliographical Study,” Oriens Extremus 10: 1 (1963), 61-82.
Ji Xiao-bin, Politics and Conservatism in Northern Song China: The Career and Thought of Sima Guang (A.D. 1019-1086), Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press, 2005
Ji Xiaobin, “Mirror for Governments: Ssu-ma Kuang’s Thought on Politics and Government in Tzu-chih t’ung-chien,” in Thomas H. C. Lee, ed., The New and the Multiple: Sung Sense of the Past, Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press, 2004, pp.1-31.
Christian Lamouroux, “`Old Models,’ Court Culture and Antiquity between 1070 and 1125 in Northern Song China,” in Perceptions of Antiquity in Chinese Civilization, ed. by Dieter Kuhn and Helga Stahl, Heidelberg: edition forum, 2008, pp. 291-319.
Thomas H. C. Lee, “History, Erudition and Good Government: Cheng Ch’iao and Encyclopedic Historical Thinking,” in Thomas H. C. Lee, ed., The New and the Multiple: Sung Senses of the Past, Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press, 2004, pp. 163-200.
Tsong-han Lee, Different Mirrors of the Past: Southern Song Historiography, Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University, 2008.
Ari Daniel Levine, Divided by a Common Language: Factional Conflict in late Northern Song China, Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2008.
劉靜貞, “書寫與事實之間 – 五代史記中的女性像,” in 《宋史研究集》第三十三輯, Taipei: Langtai, 2003, pp. 267-97.
劉連開, “宋代修史制度史研究述評,” in 《宋代制度史研究百年 (1900-2000)》, ed. by 包偉民, 北京: 商務, 2004, pp, 267-280.
劉乃和 & 宋衍申, ed., 《司馬光與資治通鑑》, 長春: 吉林文史, 1986.
劉乃和, ed., 《冊府元龜新探》, 鄭州: 中州書畫, 1983.
E. G. Pulleyblank, “Chinese Historical Criticism: Liu Chih-chi and Ssu-ma Kuang,” in Historians of China and Japan, ed. by W. G. Beasley & E. G. Pulleyblank, 1961, pp. 135-166.
舒仁輝, 《東都事略與宋史比較研究》, 北京: 商務, 2007.
Billy K. L. So, “Negotiating Chinese Identity in Five Dynasties Narratives: From the Old History to the New History,’ in Power and Identity in the Chinese World Order: Festschrift in Honor of Professor Wang Gungwu, Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2003, pp. 223-38.
宋衍申, 《司馬光大傳》, 長春出版, 1999.
孫立堯, 《宋代史論研究》, 北京: 中華, 2009.
Hoyt Cleveland Tillman (田浩), “史學與文話化思想:司馬光對諸葛亮故事的重建 (History and Culture: Sima Guang’s reconstruction of Zhuge Liang’s Story),” 《中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊》 73:1 (2002), pp. 165-98.
Wang Gung-wu, “The Chiu Wu-tai Shih and History-writing during the Five Dynasties,” Asia Major, New Series VI: 1 (1957), pp. 1-22.
王德毅, “孫甫的生平及其史學,” 《宋史研究集》 27 (1997), pp. 443-64.
鄔國義, “新發現的司馬光與范夢得內翰論修書帖考論,” 《華東師範大學學報哲學社會科學版》1988:1, pp. 117-26.
鄔國義, “宋司馬光通鑑稿研究,” in 劉乃和 & 宋衍申, ed., 《司馬光與資治通鑑》, pp. 144-74.
謝保成,“北宋中期的唐史研究與新唐書重修中的幾個問,” 《中國史研究》 1997.4, pp. 106-117.
辛德勇, “談傳言所說晚近存世金刻本舊五代史乃絕無其事,” 《中華文史論叢》 91 (2008.3), pp. 251-84.
張明華,《新五代史研究》, 北京: 中國社會科學, 2007.
張須,《通鑑學》,台北: 聚澤書屋,1984 (1948).
張元, “讀田浩教授〈史學與文話化思想:司馬光對諸葛亮故事的重建〉一文,” 《中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊》 73:1 (2002), pp. 199-204.
張元, “胡三省與中國史書的注釋傳統,” 《中國史學史研討會:從比較觀點出發論文集》, 台北: 稻鄉, 1999, pp. 177-98.
周文玖,《中國史學史學科的產生和發展》, 北京: 北京師範大學, 2002. |
評量方式 (僅供參考) |
No. |
項目 |
百分比 |
說明 |
1. |
期末作業 |
40% |
|
2. |
課堂參與表現 |
60% |
含基本課堂要求如準時出席、遵守秩序、講義準備、詢答合度等 |
|
週次 |
日期 |
單元主題 |
第1週 |
|
史學史研究簡說(一) |
第2週 |
|
史學史研究簡說(二) |
第3週 |
|
史學史研究簡說(三) |
第4週 |
|
師生商定 (下同) |
第7週 |
|
|
|