課程名稱 |
英文漢學中的問題與爭論二 Controversies and Debates in Anglophonic Sinology (Ⅱ) |
開課學期 |
103-2 |
授課對象 |
文學院 歷史學研究所 |
授課教師 |
宋家復 |
課號 |
Hist5019 |
課程識別碼 |
123 U8420 |
班次 |
|
學分 |
2 |
全/半年 |
半年 |
必/選修 |
選修 |
上課時間 |
星期三3,4(10:20~12:10) |
上課地點 |
歷史研討室 |
備註 |
限學士班三年級以上 總人數上限:20人 |
Ceiba 課程網頁 |
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1032Hist5019_ |
課程簡介影片 |
|
核心能力關聯 |
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖 |
課程大綱
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
課程概述 |
123 U8420中國研究的海內外分進合流近年來已經蔚為風潮,在研究課題和取徑上中外學者分享共通的機會愈見頻繁。本課程的目的,在於藉著閱讀過去半世紀以來英文中國研究學界內(外)所生產的一系列論辯文獻,接引大學部高年級主修歷史(或人文社會科學)的同學平順進入問題取向的跨國語境。這不是一門二次大戰後西方漢學研究的通史或文獻回顧,因為著重的只限於曾經引發學者之間公開爭議辯論的課題。 |
課程目標 |
希望在精讀前輩學者們彼此針鋒相對、砥礪琢磨的論述之中,我們學會欣賞學界的多元喧嘩與有情眾生的有限性,並且幫助我們自身研究問題意識的形塑與反思。 |
課程要求 |
基本的學術英文閱讀能力,審問深思暨自我問題化的意願。 |
預期每週課後學習時數 |
|
Office Hours |
另約時間 |
指定閱讀 |
1文化中國的定義問題
Tu Wei-ming, “Cultural China: The Periphery as Center,” Daedalus: Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 120: 2 (1991).
2文化中國的定義問題
Paul A. Cohen, “Cultural China: Some definitional Issues,” PEW 43:3 (1993), pp. 557-63.
3中國中心史觀:外國學者的分寸
Michael Gasster, “Discovering China in History: Some Comments on Paul Cohen’s Discovering History in China,” The American Asian Review 5: 2 (1987), pp. 121-53.
4中國中心史觀:外國學者的分寸
Paul A. Cohen, “Our Proper Concerns as Historians of China: A Reply to Michael Gasster,” The American Asian Review 6:1 (1988), pp. 1-24.
5徘徊在文本與脈絡之間的思想傳記
Ying-shih Yü, “The Intellectual World of Chiao Hung Revisited: A Review Article,” Ming Studies 25 (1988), pp. 24-66.
6徘徊在文本與脈絡之間的思想傳記
Edward T. Ch’ien, “Neither Structuralism Nor Lovejoy’s History of Ideas: A Disidentificaion with Professor Yü Ying-shih’s Review as a Dis-course,” Ming Studies 31 (1991), pp. 42-86.
7懷柔遠人:望文生義抑或就事論事
Joseph W. Esherick, “Cherishing Sources from afar,” Modern China 24:2 (1998), pp. 135-61.
8懷柔遠人:望文生義抑或就事論事
James Hevia, “Postpolemical Historiography: A Reply to James Hevia,” Modern China 24:3 (1998), pp. 319-27. Esherick’s reply, pp. 328-32.
9儒學第三期 – 追求或臆想?
Tu Wei-ming, “Iconoclasm, Holistic Vision, and Patient Watchfulness: A Personal Reflection on the Modern Chinese Intellectual Quest,” Daedalus 116:2 (1987), pp. 75-94.
10儒學第三期 – 追求或臆想?
Arif Dirlik, “Confucius in Borderlands: Global Capitalism and the Reinvention of Confucianism,” Boundary 2 (1995), pp. 229-73.
11“孔夫子主義Confucianism”根本是傳教士建構的產物?
Lionel M. Jensen, Manufacturing Confucianism: Chinese Traditions and Universal Civilization, Duke UP, 1997.
12“孔夫子主義Confucianism”根本是傳教士建構的產物?
Willard J. Peterson, review, HJAS 59:1 (1999), pp. 276-83.
T. H. Barrett, “Is There a Chinese Word for “Confucius”? A Review Article,” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 62:1 (1999), pp. 105-10.
13中國如何如何,誰說了算?
Robert Bagley, review of Monumentality in Early Chinese Art and Architecture by Wu Hung, HJAS 58:1 (1998), pp. 221-56.
14中國如何如何,誰說了算?
Wu Hung, “A Response to Robert Bagley’s Review of My Book,” Archives of Asian Art 51 (1998/99), pp. 92-102.
15清朝:漢化靠攏?多元典範?
Ping-Ti Ho, “In Defense of Sinicization: a Rebuttal of Evelyn Rawski's "Reenvisioning the Qing," JAS 57:1 (Feb 1998), pp. 123-155.
16清朝:漢化靠攏?多元典範?
Evelyn S. Rawski, “Presidential Address: Reenvisioning the Qing: the Significance of the Qing Period in Chinese History,” JAS 55:4 (Nov 1996), pp. 829-850.
17公共領域在中國是否可能?
William T. Rowe, “The Public Sphere in Modern China,” Modern China 16:3 (Jul 1990), pp. 309-329.
18公共領域在中國是否可能?
Philip C.C. Huang, “'Public sphere' / 'civil society' in China? The third realm between state and society,” Modern China 19:2 (Apr 1993), pp. 216-240.
|
參考書目 |
|
評量方式 (僅供參考) |
|
|