|
課程名稱 |
專題研究：真理的修正理論
Independent Study: The Revision Theory of Truth |
|
開課學期 |
110-1 |
|
授課對象 |
文學院 哲學研究所 |
|
授課教師 |
鄧敦民 |
|
課號 |
Phl7889 |
|
課程識別碼 |
124 M6180 |
|
班次 |
|
|
學分 |
1.0 |
|
全/半年 |
半年 |
|
必/選修 |
選修 |
|
上課時間 |
星期五1(8:10~9:00) |
|
上課地點 |
哲研討室二 |
|
備註 |
本課程中文授課,使用英文教科書。請先徵得授課教師及申請者同意後，始得選課。
限碩士班以上 且 限本系所學生(含輔系、雙修生)
總人數上限：3人 |
|
|
|
|
課程簡介影片 |
|
|
核心能力關聯 |
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖 |
|
課程大綱
|
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
|
課程概述 |
真理的修正理論(The Revision Theory of Truth)為一種以古典邏輯為基礎的真理理論，試圖以修正序列(revision process)來釐清包含真理謂詞(truth predicate)的語言的真理概念，以幫助解決說謊者悖論。自從上世紀八零年代由Herzberger 1982a, 1982b和Gupta 1982首開先河，並於Gupta and Belnap 1993完成整體理論架構，真理的修正理論不但已經成為探討說謊者悖論的經典理論，並且在模糊性(vagueness)和抽象事物(abstract objects)等議題的討論上也有應用。本專題旨在仔細研究真理的修正理論，除了閱讀上述經典文獻以外，亦旁及Asmus 2013和王文方2011等衍生性的重要應用，以期對真理的修正理論有完整的認識。 |
|
課程目標 |
使學生熟悉真理的修正理論，了解其形式架構與性質，以及相關的哲學詮釋，和特定哲學議題上的應用，以期深化對真理相關議題如說謊者悖論等之研究。 |
|
課程要求 |
每週閱讀指定內容，並寫作短文，定期討論。 |
|
預期每週課後學習時數 |
|
|
Office Hours |
|
|
指定閱讀 |
Antonelli, G.A., 1994, “The complexity of revision”, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 35: 204–218.
Asmus C.M., 2013, “Vagueness and revision sequences”, Synthese, 190: 953–974.
Belnap, N., 2006, “Prosentence, Revision, Truth, and Paradox”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 73: 705–712.
Berker S., 2011, “Gupta’s gambit”, Philosophical Studies, 152: 17–39.
Chapuis, A., 1996, “Alternate revision theories of truth”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 25: 399–423.
Gupta, A., 1982, “Truth and paradox”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 11: 1–60.
–––, 2006, Empiricism and Experience, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gupta, A., and Belnap, N., 1993, The Revision Theory of Truth, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Halbach, V., 2011, Axiomatic Theories of Truth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Herzberger, H.G., 1982a, “Notes on naive semantics”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 11: 61–102.
–––, 1982b, “Naive semantics and the liar paradox”, Journal of Philosophy, 79: 479–497.
Horsten, L., 2011, The Tarskian Turn: Deflationism and Axiomatic Truth, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Horsten, L., Leigh, G.E., Leitgeb, H., and Welch, P., 2012, “Revision Revisited”, The Review of Symbolic Logic, 5: 642–665.
Restall, G., 2005, “Minimalists about Truth Can (and Should) Be Epistemicists, and it Helps if They Are Revision Theorists too”, in Deflation and Paradox, JC Beall and B. Armour-Garb (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 97–106.
Wang, W., 2011, “Theories of abstract objects without ad hoc restriction”, Erkenntnis 74: 1–15.
Yaqūb, A., 1993, The Liar Speaks the Truth : A Defense of the Revision Theory of Truth, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
–––, 2008, “Two types of deflationist”, Synthese, 165: 77–106.
|
|
參考書目 |
Antonelli, G.A., 1994, “The complexity of revision”, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 35: 204–218.
Asmus C.M., 2013, “Vagueness and revision sequences”, Synthese, 190: 953–974.
Belnap, N., 2006, “Prosentence, Revision, Truth, and Paradox”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 73: 705–712.
Berker S., 2011, “Gupta’s gambit”, Philosophical Studies, 152: 17–39.
Chapuis, A., 1996, “Alternate revision theories of truth”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 25: 399–423.
Gupta, A., 1982, “Truth and paradox”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 11: 1–60.
–––, 2006, Empiricism and Experience, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gupta, A., and Belnap, N., 1993, The Revision Theory of Truth, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Halbach, V., 2011, Axiomatic Theories of Truth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Herzberger, H.G., 1982a, “Notes on naive semantics”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 11: 61–102.
–––, 1982b, “Naive semantics and the liar paradox”, Journal of Philosophy, 79: 479–497.
Horsten, L., 2011, The Tarskian Turn: Deflationism and Axiomatic Truth, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Horsten, L., Leigh, G.E., Leitgeb, H., and Welch, P., 2012, “Revision Revisited”, The Review of Symbolic Logic, 5: 642–665.
Restall, G., 2005, “Minimalists about Truth Can (and Should) Be Epistemicists, and it Helps if They Are Revision Theorists too”, in Deflation and Paradox, JC Beall and B. Armour-Garb (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 97–106.
Wang, W., 2011, “Theories of abstract objects without ad hoc restriction”, Erkenntnis 74: 1–15.
Yaq?b, A., 1993, The Liar Speaks the Truth : A Defense of the Revision Theory of Truth, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
–––, 2008, “Two types of deflationist”, Synthese, 165: 77–106. |
|
評量方式
(僅供參考) |
|
No. |
項目 |
百分比 |
說明 |
|
1. |
參與討論 |
40% |
|
2. |
課堂報告 |
60% |
|
|
|
週次 |
日期 |
單元主題 |
|
第1週 |
9/24 |
課程介紹 |
|
第2週 |
10/01 |
Herzberger, “Notes on naive semantics” and “Naive semantics and the liar paradox” |
|
第3週 |
10/08 |
Yaqūb, The Liar Speaks the Truth, Introduction and Chapter 1 |
|
第4週 |
10/15 |
Yaqūb, The Liar Speaks the Truth, Chapter 2 |
|
第5週 |
10/22 |
Yaqūb, The Liar Speaks the Truth, Chapter 3 |
|
第6週 |
10/29 |
Yaqūb, The Liar Speaks the Truth, Chapter 4 |
|
第7週 |
11/05 |
Gupta and Belnap, The Revision Theory of Truth, Chapter 1 |
|
第8週 |
11/12 |
Gupta and Belnap, The Revision Theory of Truth, Chapter 2 |
|
第9週 |
11/19 |
Midterm week |
|
第10週 |
11/26 |
Gupta and Belnap, The Revision Theory of Truth, Chapter 3 |
|
第11週 |
12/03 |
Gupta and Belnap, The Revision Theory of Truth, Chapter 4 |
|
第12週 |
12/10 |
Gupta and Belnap, The Revision Theory of Truth, Chapter 5 |
|
第13週 |
12/17 |
Gupta and Belnap, The Revision Theory of Truth, Chapter 6 |
|
第14週 |
12/24 |
Gupta and Belnap, The Revision Theory of Truth, Chapter 7 |
|
第15週 |
12/31 |
Halbach, Axiomatic Theories of Truth, Chapter 11 |
|
第16週 |
1/07 |
Horsten, The Tarskian Turn: Deflationism and Axiomatic Truth, Chapter 8 |
|