|
課程名稱 |
專題研究：富蘭克福案例
Independent Study: The Frankfurt Cases |
|
開課學期 |
111-1 |
|
授課對象 |
文學院 哲學研究所 |
|
授課教師 |
鄧敦民 |
|
課號 |
Phl7893 |
|
課程識別碼 |
124 M6220 |
|
班次 |
|
|
學分 |
1.0 |
|
全/半年 |
半年 |
|
必/選修 |
選修 |
|
上課時間 |
星期五1(8:10~9:00) |
|
上課地點 |
哲研討室二 |
|
備註 |
本課程中文授課,使用英文教科書。請先徵得授課教師及申請者同意後，始得選課。
限碩士班以上 且 限本系所學生(含輔系、雙修生)
總人數上限：3人 |
|
課程簡介影片 |
|
|
核心能力關聯 |
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖 |
|
課程大綱
|
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
|
課程概述 |
The Frankfurt Cases are thought experiments proposed firstly by Harry Frankfurt as counter-examples to the “principle of alternative possibilities (PAP)”. PAP claims that agents are morally responsible for their actions only if and because they could have acted otherwise. If successful, the Frankfurt Cases will be a strong challenge to PAP. After Frankfurt, many philosophers including John Martin Fischer and David Widerker etc. started to debate on this topic. Alfred R. Mele, David Robb, Derk Pereboom and many others also proposed stronger versions of the Frankfurt Cases. The objective of this course is to discuss in detail the perspectives of Frankfurt and many philosophers after him about the Frankfurt Cases, in order to study this issue thoroughly. |
|
課程目標 |
To familiarize students with different versions of the Frankfurt Cases and the relevant discussions, in order to facilitate the research about the ground of moral responsibility. |
|
課程要求 |
|
|
預期每週課後學習時數 |
|
|
Office Hours |
|
|
指定閱讀 |
|
|
參考書目 |
指定閱讀：
Widerker, D., and McKenna, M., 2006, Moral Responsibility and Alternative Possibilities, Aldershot; Burlington: Ashgate.
參考書目：
Berofsky, B., 1987, Freedom from Necessity, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Fischer, J.M., 1982, “Responsibility and Control”, Journal of Philosophy, 89: 24-40.
Frankfurt, H., 1969, “Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility”, Journal of Philosophy, 66: 829-839.
Ginet, C., 1996, “In Defense of the Principle of Alternative Possibilities: Why I Don’t Find Frankfurt’s Argument Convincing”, Philosophical Perspectives, 10: 403-417.
Kane, R., 2000, “The Dual Regress of Free Will and the Role of Alternative Possibilities”, Philosophical Perspectives, 14: 57-79.
Mele, A., and Robb, D., 1998, “Rescuing Frankfurt-Style Cases”, Philosophical Review, 107: 97-112.
Widerker, D., 2000, “Frankfurt’s Attack on the Principle of Alternative Possibilities: A Further Look”, Philosophical Perspectives, 14: 181-201. |
|
評量方式
(僅供參考) |
|
|