|
課程名稱 |
專題研究：柯思嘉德的公共理由觀
Independent Study: Korsgaard's Conception of Public |
|
開課學期 |
111-1 |
|
授課對象 |
文學院 哲學研究所 |
|
授課教師 |
王榮麟 |
|
課號 |
Phl7895 |
|
課程識別碼 |
124 M6240 |
|
班次 |
|
|
學分 |
1.0 |
|
全/半年 |
半年 |
|
必/選修 |
選修 |
|
上課時間 |
星期一A(18:25~19:15) |
|
上課地點 |
哲研討室二 |
|
備註 |
本課程中文授課,使用英文教科書。請先徵得授課教師及申請者同意後，始得選課。
限碩士班以上 且 限本系所學生(含輔系、雙修生)
總人數上限：3人 |
|
課程簡介影片 |
|
|
核心能力關聯 |
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖 |
|
課程大綱
|
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
|
課程概述 |
Christine Korsgaard’s philosophical goal is to justify that moral requirements are the requirements that every possible rational being has reason to comply with. To do this, she provides a three-phased argument. This course will mainly concern with the argument for the publicity of reasons in the third phase. |
|
課程目標 |
Comprehend Korsgaard’s ethical thoughts, evaluate her argument for the publicity of reasons, and try to respond to other philosophers’ objections to that argument. |
|
課程要求 |
|
|
預期每週課後學習時數 |
|
|
Office Hours |
|
|
指定閱讀 |
|
|
參考書目 |
Beyleveld, Deryck (2015). “Korsgaard v Gewirth on Universalisation: Why Gewirthians are Kantians and Kantians Ought to be Gewirthians.” Journal of Moral Philosophy, 12 (5): 573-597.
Cholbi, Michael J. (1999). “Egoism and the Publicity of Reason: A Reply to Korsgaard.” Social Theory and Practice, 25 (3): 491-517.
De Maagt, Sem (2018). “It only takes two to tango: against grounding morality in interaction.” Philosophical Studies, 176 (2019): 2767-2783.
--- (2018). “Korsgaard’s Other Argument for Interpersonal Morality: the Argument from the Sufficiency of Agency.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 21 (2018): 887-902.
Gert, Joshua (2002). “Korsgaard's Private-Reasons Argument.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 64 (2): 303-324.
--- (2015). “Wittgenstein, Korsgaard and the Publicity of Reasons.” Inquiry, 58 (5): 439-459.
Korsgaard, Christine M. (1996a). Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
--- (1996b). The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
--- (2008). The Constitution of Agency. New York: Oxford University Press.
--- (2009). Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity. New York: Oxford University Press.
--- (2021). “Valuing Our Humanity.” Richard Dean and Oliver Sensen (eds.). Respect: Philosophical Essays (171-191). New York: Oxford University Press.
LeBar, Mark (2001). “Korsgaard, Wittgenstein, and the Mafioso.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 39 (2): 261-271.
Nagel, Thomas (1970). The Possibility of Altruism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
--- (1986). The View from Nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press.
O’Day, Ken (1998). “Normativity and Interpersonal Reasons.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 1 (1): 61-83.
Salazar, Heather (2021). Creating a Shared Morality: The Feasibility of Ethical Constructivism. Leiden: Brill.
Scanlon, Thomas M (2014). Being Realistic about Reasons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Skidmore, James (2002). “Skepticism about Practical Reason: Transcendental Arguments and their Limits.” Philosophical Studies, 109 (2): 121-141.
Skorupski, John (1998). “Rescuing Moral Obligation.” European Journal of Philosophy, 6 (3): 335-355.
Stern, Robert (2011). “The Value of Humanity: Reflections on Korsgaard’s Transcendental Argument.” Joel Smith and Peter Sullivan (eds.). Transcendental Philosophy and Naturalism (74-95). New York: Oxford University Press.
Wallace, R. Jay (2009). “The Publicity of Reasons.” Philosophical Perspectives, 23 (1): 471-497.
Williams, Bernard (1981). “Internal and External Reasons.” Moral Luck: philosophical papers, 1973-1980 (101-113). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
|
評量方式
(僅供參考) |
|
|