Course title |
Plato and the Sophists |
Semester |
109-1 |
Designated for |
COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS GRADUATE INSTITUTE OF PHILOSOPHY |
Instructor |
I-Kai Jeng |
Curriculum Number |
Phl7528 |
Curriculum Identity Number |
124 M8080 |
Class |
|
Credits |
3.0 |
Full/Half Yr. |
Half |
Required/ Elective |
Elective |
Time |
Wednesday 7,8,9(14:20~17:20) |
Remarks |
The upper limit of the number of students: 15. |
Ceiba Web Server |
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1091Phl7528_ |
Course introduction video |
|
Table of Core Capabilities and Curriculum Planning |
Table of Core Capabilities and Curriculum Planning |
Course Syllabus
|
Please respect the intellectual property rights of others and do not copy any of the course information without permission
|
Course Description |
Our conception of philosophy is largely due to Plato’s dialogues, which provide a transfigured portrait of his teacher Socrates as the ideal philosopher. This determination of what it means to be a philosopher often occurs in the dialogues in terms of contrasts: the contrast between the philosopher and the poet; that between the philosopher and the sophists (sophistai). Plato’s reflection on the poets and the sophists share much in common, but this course will focus on the particular issues raised in his engagement with the latter.
Plato was concerned with sophists all his life, and thus one can see their presence in almost all his works in varying degrees. This course will begin with some fragments by the sophists, together with crucial passages from more difficult Platonic works, and then plunge right into five short- to medium-length dialogues in which Socrates directly confronts a contemporary sophist (or sophists) about certain topics. Our interpretation of the dialogues will be primarily guided by, but not limited to, the following questions: is language all-powerful? Is virtue teachable? What is the nature of convention or law (nomos)? Can one live the good life without practicing justice? Is pleasure the highest good? |
Course Objective |
1.Acquisition of basic hermeneutic skills in interpreting Plato through a moderately careful reading of five of his dialogues.
2. Comprehension of the philosophical significance of the issue of “Plato and the Sophists.” |
Course Requirement |
Be on time, read assignments before class, participate during class, finish the homework and tests. |
Student Workload (expected study time outside of class per week) |
|
Office Hours |
|
Designated reading |
Gorgias, Encomium of Helen; On Non-Being
柏拉圖《智者》篇選讀段落;柏拉圖《米諾》篇選讀段落
柏拉圖的 Euthydemus, Hippias Major, Protagoras, 與 Gorgias 選讀;共三篇半對話錄 |
References |
Bartlett, Robert C. (2016) Sophistry and Political Philosophy. University of Chicago Press.
Lampert, Laurence (2010) “Protagoras: Socrates and the Greek Enlightenment,” in How Philosophy Became Socratic, University of Chicago Press, pp. 19-146.
Strauss, Leo (1983) “On the Euthydemus.” In: Studies in Platonic Political Philosophy, University of Chicago Press, pp. 67-88.
Wardy, Robert (1998) The Birth of Rhetoric: Gorgias, Plato, and their Successors. Routledge. |
Grading |
No. |
Item |
% |
Explanations for the conditions |
1. |
In class discussion |
20% |
|
2. |
In class work |
60% |
|
3. |
Final essay |
20% |
|
|
Week |
Date |
Topic |
Week 1 |
9/16 |
Introduction |
Week 2 |
9/23 |
Gorgias, Encomium, On Non-Being |
Week 3 |
9/30 |
Euthydemus 271a-290a |
Week 4 |
10/07 |
Euthydemus 290a-307c |
Week 5 |
10/14 |
Hippias Major 281a-293c |
Week 6 |
10/21 |
Hippias Major 293d-304e |
Week 7 |
10/28 |
Protagoras 309a-319a |
Week 8 |
11/04 |
Protagoras 319a-329b |
Week 9 |
11/11 |
Protagoras 329b-338e |
Week 10 |
11/18 |
Protagoras 339a-349a |
Week 11 |
11/25 |
Protagoras 349b-362a |
Week 12 |
12/02 |
Hippias Minor |
Week 13 |
12/09 |
Gorgias 447a-461b |
Week 14 |
12/16 |
Gorgias 461b-474c |
Week 15 |
12/23 |
Gorgias 474c-488b |
Week 16 |
12/30 |
期末報告課堂發表討論 |
Week 17 |
1/06 |
柏拉圖與智者之爭小結 |