課程資訊
課程名稱
神的隱匿與人的理性
Divine Hiddenness and Human Reason 
開課學期
110-2 
授課對象
文學院  哲學研究所  
授課教師
陳樂知 
課號
Phl7579 
課程識別碼
124 M8230 
班次
 
學分
3.0 
全/半年
半年 
必/選修
選修 
上課時間
星期二A,B,C(18:25~21:05) 
上課地點
哲研討室二 
備註
本課程中文授課,使用英文教科書。研究所:E領域。 大學部:(C)哲學專題群組。
總人數上限:15人 
Ceiba 課程網頁
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1102Phl7579_ 
課程簡介影片
 
核心能力關聯
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖
課程大綱
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
課程概述

如果上帝存在,為甚麼祂不在宇宙中現身,向世人宣示自己的存在?這是纏繞宗教信徒千年的問題,在宗教哲學學界卻鮮有討論。直至1993年,著名無神論宗教哲學家John Schellenberg出版《Divine Hiddenness and Human Reason》一書,為「上帝隱匿難題(divine hiddenness problem)」提供了嚴謹之論證,在國際學界引起廣泛討論,成為當代哲學經典名著。近期,國際著名學術機構 英國伯明翰大學宗教哲學中心 與 美國約翰·坦伯頓基金,亦對本書之台灣中譯計畫頒發「全球宗教哲學計劃翻譯獎助金」(陳樂知譯,計畫進行中,預定於臺大出版中心出版),可見國際學界對此問題之重視。
課程以研讀Schellenberg之名著為主,並輔以其他當代哲學家之相關文獻。課程可能使用部份中譯稿。書中,Schellenberg亦細心討論Soren Kierkegaard、Blaise Pascal、John Calvin、David Hume、Karl Rahner、John Hick、Alvin Plantinga等古今著名哲學家與神學家之相關重要文獻。修課同學將接觸古今各學術傳統針對上帝之辯論。
本課程非宗教課,不會預設或推廣任何宗教觀點;修課同學無需熟悉任何宗教傳統或典籍。課程集中於英美分析哲學著作,但文獻大多直接討論宗教問題,修課同學無需熟悉該哲學傳統。

If God exists, why doesn’t he appear in the universe and declare his existence to the world? This is a problem that has disturbed religious believers for thousands of years. Academic discussion of the question had surprisingly been lacking until the publication of Schellenberg’s influential book, Divine Hiddenness and Human Reason, in 1993. The book provides a rigorous defense of the ‘divine hiddenness problem’, and has since widely discussed by theists and atheists alike and become a contemporary philosophical classic masterpiece. Recently, the internationally renowned academic institutions, the Birmingham Centre for Philosophy of Religion and the John Templeton Foundation, have also awarded the ‘Global Philosophy of Religion Project Translation Grant’ to the Taiwan Chinese Translation Project of this book (translated by Lok-Chi Chan, project in progress, scheduled to be published by the NTU Press). This shows that the international academic community attaches great importance to the issue.

The course focuses on investigating Schellenberg’s masterpieces, supplemented by related literature by other contemporary philosophers. Some drafts of the Chinese translation may be used in the course. In the book, Schellenberg also offers a careful survey of the religious thoughts of such influential philosophers and theologians as Pascal, Calvin, Kierkegaard, Rahner, Hick, Plantinga, and others. Students in the course will be exposed to the debates for and against God in various academic traditions, ancient and modern.

This course is not a religious class, and will not presuppose or promote any religious views. Students taking this course do not need to be familiar with any religious traditions or classics. In addition, although the course focuses on Anglo-American analytic philosophy, most of the readings discuss religious issues directly, and so students taking this course do not need to be familiar with the philosophical tradition.
 

課程目標
本課程的目標如下:
(1)讓學生理解一神論與無神論的立場與世界觀,並作出自己的判斷。
(2)接觸基督教哲學與神學哲學。
(3)接觸一些影響深遠的哲學史觀點。
(4)宗教哲學是最重視哲學論證的哲學範疇之一,因此本課程讓學生熟習建立與批判哲學論證。

The aims of this course are as follows:
(1) Upon completing this course, students will have understood monotheistic and atheistic worldviews and be capable of making their own judgments.
(2) Surveying some Christian philosophy and philosophical theology.
(3) Surveying some historically influential viewpoints.
(4) Among different areas of philosophy, philosophy of religion is one of those that particularly focus on philosophical arguments. Upon completing this course, students will have developed their skills in developing and critically assessing philosophical arguments.
 
課程要求
曾修讀哲學相關課程,但不限特定哲學傳統。確實閱讀文本,理解其中的各種論證並對之進行批判。 
預期每週課後學習時數
 
Office Hours
 
指定閱讀
Schellenberg, JL 2006, Divine hiddenness and human reason (with a new preface), New York: Cornell University Press.
(另見每週閱讀) 
參考書目
兩本回應主題之重要文集:
Howard-Snyder D & Moser P (eds.) 2002, Divine hiddenness: new essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Green, A & Stump, E (eds.) 2015, Hidden divinity and religious belief: new perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

有關另一種類似論證,「不信者難題(argument from nonbelief)」,的另一本重要著作:
Drange, T 1998, Nonbelief & evil: two arguments for the nonexistence of God, New York: Prometheus Books.

其他參考文獻:
McCool, G (ed.) 1975, A Rahner reader, New York: The Seabury Press.
Hick, J 1989, An interpretation of religion, Basingstoke: The Macmillan Press.
Howard-Snyder, D (ed.) 1996, The evidential argument from evil, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Swinburne, R 1998, Providence and the Problem of Evil, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
McKim, R 2001, Religious Ambiguity and Religious Diversity, New York: Oxford University Press.
Schellenberg, JL 2007, The wisdom to doubt: a justification of religious skepticism, New York: Cornell University Press.
Hick, J 2010, Evil and the God of love, 2010 reissue with a new preface, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillian. 
評量方式
(僅供參考)
 
No.
項目
百分比
說明
1. 
課堂表現 
10% 
出席及參與課堂討論。 
2. 
閱讀報告  
30% 
對指定閱讀作出報告及評論。 
3. 
期末發表  
10% 
發表期末報告內容。 
4. 
期末報告  
50% 
3000-4000字研究報告。 
 
課程進度
週次
日期
單元主題
第1週
2/15  課程介紹 
第2週
2/22  Bertrand Russell, ‘Why I Am Not a Christian’ 
第3週
3/01  Graham Oppy, ‘Arguments for Atheism’ 
第4週
3/08  DHHR, Introduction, and Ch. 1 ‘Some Epistemic Implications of Divine Love’

報告人: 戴安邦 、 評論人: 陳識閔 
第5週
3/15  DHHR, Ch. 2 ‘Is a Strong Epistemic Situation in Relation to Theism Possible?’ & Ch. 3 ‘The Reasonableness of Nonbelief’

報告人: 陳瑩瑄 、 評論人: 戴安邦 
第6週
3/22  DHHR, Ch. 3 ‘The Reasonableness of Nonbelief’ & Ch. 4 ‘A Summation of the Case’

報告人: 詹遠至 、 評論人: 黃柏綜 
第7週
3/29  DHHR, Ch. 5 ‘Moral Freedom and Its Requirements’

報告人: 黃馨儀 、 評論人: 陳瑩瑄 
第8週
4/05  假期 
第9週
4/12  DHHR, Ch. 6 ‘The Importance of Inwardness’

報告人: 黃柏綜 、 評論人: 蔡仁豪 
第10週
4/19  DHHR, Ch. 7 ‘Investigation, Diversity, and Responsibility’ and Conclusion

報告人: 陳識閔 、 評論人: 郭建成 
第11週
4/26  Michael Tooley, 'The Problem of Evil', Sect. 6-8 only.

報告人: 毛世琦 
第12週
5/03  Daniel Howard-Snyder & Adam Green, ‘Hiddenness of God’ 
第13週
5/10  Jason Marsh, ‘Do the Demographics of Theistic Belief Disconfirm Theism? A Reply to Maitzen’
Stephen Maitzen, ‘Does Molinism Explain the Demographics of Theism?’

報告人:江愷元、評論人:黃馨儀 
第14週
5/17  Jonathan L. Kvanvig, ‘Divine Hiddenness: What is the Problem?’
Paul Draper, ‘Seeking but not believing: confessions of a practicing agnostic’

報告人:戴安邦 
第15週
5/24  Justin P. Mcbrayer & Philip Swenson, ‘Scepticism about the argument from divine hiddenness’

報告人:蔡仁豪、評論人:詹遠至 
第16週
5/31  期末發表