|
課程名稱 |
資訊組織研討
Seminar in Information Organization |
|
開課學期 |
112-2 |
|
授課對象 |
文學院 圖書資訊學研究所 |
|
授課教師 |
藍文欽 |
|
課號 |
LIS7013 |
|
課程識別碼 |
126 M0570 |
|
班次 |
|
|
學分 |
3.0 |
|
全/半年 |
半年 |
|
必/選修 |
必修 |
|
上課時間 |
星期二2,3,4(9:10~12:10) |
|
上課地點 |
圖資編目室 |
|
備註 |
先修科目：「資訊組織一」與「資訊組織二」；或「資訊蒐集與組織」。
限碩士班以上 或 限博士班
總人數上限：20人 |
|
|
|
|
課程簡介影片 |
|
|
核心能力關聯 |
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖 |
|
課程大綱
|
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
|
課程概述 |
資訊組織是藉由描述資訊物件（information objects）之載體與內容，建立代表原件之替代紀錄(surrogate / representation)，並透過系統化的組織，建置成檢索工具，以幫助使用者依其資訊需求查詢、檢索、辨識、評估、及獲取資料。
本課程以本系大學部之「資訊組織一」及「資訊組織二」或碩士班之「資訊蒐集與組織」為先備課程，旨在研討圖書資訊組織與書目控制的理論基礎、原則、標準、相關問題、發展歷史與趨勢等。本課程屬於研討性質，重點在文獻研讀、分享與討論，希望藉此引領同學對資訊組織的相關議題作更深刻的探索與思考。 |
|
課程目標 |
* 熟悉資訊組織之核心概念與基本原理、原則
* 理解資訊組織相關規範與標準的意涵與功用
* 對資訊組織的重要及新興議題與發展趨勢能有所掌握
* 對資訊組織領域的研究議題與方法能有基本認識 |
|
課程要求 |
* 本課程為研討性質，請踴躍提問及分享看法。
* 請準時出席課程、繳交每週文獻摘要及指定報告 |
|
預期每週課後學習時數 |
15-20小時 |
|
Office Hours |
每週二 12:30~13:10 備註： 或另約時間 |
|
指定閱讀 |
請見各週指定閱讀 |
|
參考書目 |
課程參考資料：
* 何光國(1990)。圖書資訊組織原理。臺北市：三民。
* 余顯強(2019)。XML：資訊組織與傳播核心技術。臺北市：五南。
* 吳美美編(2021)。圖書資訊學研究回顧與前瞻2.0。臺北市：元華文創。
* 陳亞寧、牛惠曼（2021）。圖書館鏈結資料入門指引。臺北市：國家圖書館。https://nclfile.ncl.edu.tw/files/202207/a0b2ff6f-97b5-4990-a400-8f12c0693d19.pdf
* 張慧銖(2003)。圖書館目錄發展研究。臺北市：文華圖書館管理。
* 張慧銖(2011)。圖書館電子資源組織：從書架到網路。新北市：華藝學術。
* 張慧銖等(2016)。主題分析。新北市：華藝學術。
* 張慧銖等(2017)。資訊組織。新北市：華藝學術。
* Abbas, J. (2010). Structures for organizing knowledge: Exploring taxonomies, ontologies, and other schemas. New York: Neal-Schuman Publishers.
* Alemu, G. (2022). The future of enriched, linked, open and filtered metadata: making sense of IFLA LRM, RDA, linked data and BIBFRAME. London: Facet Publishing.
* Andersen, J., & Skouvig, L. (Eds.) (2017). The organization of knowledge: Caught between global structures and local meaning. Bingley: Emerald Publishing.
* Angel, C., & Fuchs, C. (Eds.) (2018). Organization, representation and description through the digital age: Information in libraries, archives and museums. Berlin: De Gruyter Saur.
* Auer, S., Bryl, V., & Tramp, S. (Eds.) (2014). Linked open data: Creating knowledge out of interlinked data: Results of the LOD2 Project. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
* Baca, M. (Ed.) (2016). Introduction to metadata (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Getty Information Institute. http://www.getty.edu/publications/intrometadata/
* Batley, S. (2007). Information architecture for information professionals. Oxford: Chandos.
* Bean, C. A., & Green, R. (2001). Relationships in the organization of knowledge. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
* Blair, D. C. (1990). Language and representation in information retrieval. New York: Elsevier Science Publishers.
* Borgman, C. L. (2000). From Gutenberg to the global information infrastructure: Access to information in the networked world. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
* Bowker, G., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting thing out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
* Broughton, V. (2015). Essential classification (2nd ed.). London: Facet Publishing.
* Brubaker, J. (2018). Text, lies and cataloging: Ethical treatment of deceptive works in the library. Jefferson, N.C.: McFarland & Company.
* Caplan, P. (2003). Metadata fundamentals for all librarians. Chicago: American Library Association, 2003.
* Carlson, S., Lampert, C., Melvin, D., & Washington, A. (2020). Linked data for the perplexed librarian. Chicago: ALA.
* Carpenter, M., & Svenonius, E. (Eds.) (1985). Foundations of cataloging: A sourcebook. Littleton, Colo.: Libraries Unlimited.
* Carter, R. C. (2000). Managing cataloging and the organization of information: Philosophies, practices, and challenges at the onset of the 21st century. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Information Press. [Co-published simultaneously as Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, v. 30, nos. 1 and 2/3]
* Cervone, H. F., & Svensson, L. G. (Eds.) (2015). Linked data and user interaction: The road ahead. Berlin: De Gruyter Saur.
* Chamber, S. (Ed.) (2013). Catalogue 2.0: The future of the library catalogue. London: Facet.
* Chan, L. M., Richmond, P. A., & Svenonius, E. (Eds.) (1985). Theory of subject analysis: A sourcebook. Littleton, Colo.: Libraries Unlimited.
* Coyle, K. (2016). FRBR before and after: A look at our bibliographic models. Chicago: ALA. http://kcoyle.net/beforeAndAfter/
* Coyle, K., et al. (2017). PCC SCS/LDAC Task Group on the Work Entity: Preliminary white paper. https://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/documents/PoCo-2017/WorkEntitity%20Preliminary%20White%20Paper-2017-09-27.pdf
* Currás, E. (2010). Ontologies, taxonomies and thesauri in systems science and systematic. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.
* Day, R. E. (2014). Indexing it all: The subject in the age of documentation, information, and data. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
* Eden, B, L. (Ed.) (2016). Rethinking technical services: New frameworks, new skill sets, new tools, new roles. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
* Edwards, K. A., & Leonard, M. (Eds.) (2019). Assessment strategies in technical services (ALA Edition). Chicago: American Library Association.
* Foskett, A. C. (1996). The subject approach to information (5th ed.). London: Library Association Pub.
* Frické, M. (2012). Logic and the organization of information. New York: Springer.
* Gartner, R. (2021). Metadata in the digital library: Building an integrated strategy with XML. London: Facet.
* Glushko, R. J. (Ed.). (2013). The discipline of organizing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
-- 此書之4th edition（2016）有下列三種版本，作者提供免費下載
Core concept edition: [omits all supplemental content] https://ischoolsinc.wildapricot.org/Discipline-of-Organizing-Core-Concept
Informatics edition: https://ischoolsinc.wildapricot.org/Discipline-of-Organizing-Informatics
Professional edition: https://berkeley.pressbooks.pub/tdo4p / or https://ischoolsinc.wildapricot.org/Discipline-of-Organizing-Professional
Case Studies: https://ischoolsinc.wildapricot.org/Discipline-of-Organizing-Case-Studies-Overview/
* Gnoli, C. (2020). Introduction to knowledge organization. London: Facet.
* Godby, C. J., Wang, S., & Mixter, J. (2015). Library linked data in the cloud: OCLC's experiments with new models of resource description. San Rafael, California: Morgan & Claypool.
* Godby, J. et al. (2019). Creating library linked data with Wikibase: Lessons learned from Project Passage. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC. https://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/publications/2019/oclcresearch-creating-library-linked-data-with-wikibase-project-passage-a4.pdf
* Green, R., Bean, C. A., & Myaeng, S. H. (Eds.) (2002). The semantics of relationships: An interdisciplinary perspectives. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Pub.
* Harpring, P. (2010). Introduction to controlled vocabularies: Terminology for art, architecture, and other cultural works (online edition). Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute. http://www.getty.edu/research/publications/electronic_publications/intro_controlled_vocab/index.html
* Harth, A., Hose, K., & Schenkel, R. (2014). Linked data management. Boca Raton : CRC Press/Taylor & Francis.
* Haynes, D. (2018). Metadata for information management and retrieval: Understanding metadata and its use (2nd ed.). London: Facet Publishing.
* Heath, T., & Bizer, C. (2011). Linked data: Evolving the Web into a global data space. San Francisco: Morgan & Claypool. HTML version: http://linkeddatabook.com/editions/1.0/
* Hines, S. S. (Ed.) (2021). Technical services in the 21st century. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing. (Advances in Library Administration and Organization, V. 42)
* Hjørland, B. (1997). Information seeking and subject representation: An activity-theoretical approach to information science. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.
* Hlava, M. M. K. (2015). The taxobook. San Rafael, California: Morgan & Claypool Publishers. [a 3-part series, 本校有紙本與電子版]
* Hodge, G. (2000). Systems of knowledge organization for digital libraries: Beyond traditional authority files. Washington, DC: The Digital Library Federation. http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub91/pub91.pdf
* Hoffman, G. L. (2019). Organizing library collections: Theory and practice. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
* Hoffman, G. L., & Snow, K. (Eds.) (2022). Cataloging and classification: Back to basics. New York: Routledge. [Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, volume 59, numbers 2/3 (Feb., 2021)之單印本]
* Hogan, A. (2020). The web of data. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
* Hooland, S. van, & Verborgh, R. (2014). Linked data for libraries, archives and museums: How to clean, link and publish your metadata. London : Facet Publishing. [Data and examples available at: http://book.freeyourmetadata.org/ ]
* Hsieh-Yee, I. (2016). Organizing for access with FRBR, RDA, linked data, and beyond. Santa Barbara: Libraries Unlimited.
* Hyvonen, E. (2012). Publishing and using cultural heritage linked data on the semantic web. San Rafael, Calif.: Morgan & Claypool.
* Jin, Q. (2012). Demystifying FRAD: Functional requirements for authority data. Santa Barbara, Calif.: Libraries Unlimited.
* Jones, W. (2008). Keeping found things found: The study and practice of personal information management. Amsterdam: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
* Jones, W. (2012). The future of personal information management. San Rafael, Calif.: Morgan & Claypool Publishers. [a 3-part series]
* Joudrey, D. N., Taylor, A. G., & Miller, D. P. (2015). Introduction to cataloging and classification (11th ed.). Santa Barbara, California: Libraries Unlimited. [電子版]
* Jourdrey, D. N., & Taylor, A. G. (2018). The organization of information (4th ed.). Santa Barbara, Calif.: Libraries Unlimited.
* Kelleher, J. D., & Tierney, B. (2018). Data science. Cambridge: MIT Press.
* King, B., & Reinold, K. (2008). Finding the concept, not just the word: A librarian’s guide to ontologies and semantics. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.
* Konstantinou, N., & Spanos, D.-E. (2015). Materializing the web of linked data. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
* Kumbhar, R. (2012). Library classification trends in the 21st century. Oxford: Chandos Pub.
* Latif, A. (2011). Understanding linked open data: For linked data discovery, consumption, triplification and application development. Saarbrücken: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.
* Mackey, T. P., & Jacobson, T. E. (2014). Metaliteracy: Reinventing information literacy to empower learners. Chicago: ALA.
* Mackey, T. P., & Jacobson, T. E. (Eds.) (2016). Metaliteracy in practice. Chicago: ALA.
* Mann, T. (1993). Library research models: A guide to classification, cataloging, and computers. New York : Oxford University Press.
* Marcella, R., & Maltby, A. (Eds.) (2000). The future of classification. Aldershot, Eng.; Brookfield, VT: Gower.
* Marinho, L. B., et al. (2012). Recommender systems for social tagging systems. Boston: Springer US.
* Maxwell, R. L. (2008). FRBR: A guide for the perplexed. Chicago: American Library Association.
* Miller, D. R., and Clarke, K. S. (2004). Putting XML to work in the library: Tools for improving access and management. Chicago: American Library Association.
* Miller, S. J. (Ed.) (2022). Subject analysis methodologies. New York: Magnum Publishing.
* Mitchell, A. M., & Surratt, B. E. (2005). Cataloging and organizing digital resources: A how-to-do-it manual for librarians. London: Facet Publishing.
* Mugridge, R. L. (Ed.) (2019). Assessment of cataloging and metadata services. London: Routledge.
* Okoye, K. (Ed.) (2020). Linked open data: Applications, trends and future developments. London: IntechOpen. https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/67759
* Oliver, C. (2021). Introducing RDA: A guide to the basics after 3R (2nd ed.). Chicago: American Library Association.
* Olson, H. A., & Boll, J. J. (2001). Subject analysis in online catalogs. Englewood, Colo.: Libraries Unlimited.
* Park, J.-R., & Howarth, L. C. (Eds.) (2013). New directions in information organization. Bingley, U.K.: Emerald.
* Pennington, D. R., Spiteri, L. F. (Eds.) (2019). Social tagging in a linked data environment. London: Facet Publishing.
* Peters, I. (2009). Folksonomies: Indexing and retrieval in Web 2.0 (P. Becker, trans.). Berlin: De Gruyter/Saur.
* Peters, T. A. (1991). The online catalog: A critical examination. Jefferson: McFarland.
* Po, L., Bikakis, N., & Desimoni, F. (2020). Linked data visualization: Techniques, tools, and big data. San Rafael, Calif.: Morgan & Claypool.
* Pomerantz, J. (2015). Metadata. Cambridge: The MIT Press. [中譯本：Metadata後設資料（臺北市: 經濟新潮社，2021）]
* Porumbeanu Madge, O.-L., et al. (2017). Ethical issues in library and information science. United Kingdom: Koros Press Limited.
* Raghvan, K. S., & Neelameghan, A. (Eds.) (2014). Knowledge organization: From libraries to the web. New Delhi: Ess Ess Publications.
* Raieli, R. (2022). Web-scale discovery services: Principles, applications, discovery tools and development hypotheses (E. Corradini trans.). Cambridge, MA: Candos Publishing.
* Rietveld, L. (2016). Publishing and consuming linked data: Optimizing for the unknown. Berline: IOS Press.
* Rosenfeld, L., Morville, P., & Arango, J. (2015). Information architecture: For the web and beyond (4th ed.). Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media. [中譯本：資訊架構學(臺北市：碁峰資訊, 2017)]
* Rowley, J., & Farrow, J. (2002). Organizing knowledge: An introduction to managing access to information (3rd ed.). Aldershot: Ashgate.
* Salaba, A., & Chan, L. M. (2023). Cataloging and classification: An introduction (5th ed.). Lanham, MD.: Rowman & Littlefield.
* Sandberg, J. (Ed.) (2019). Ethical questions in name authority control. Sacramento: Library Juice Press.
* Schwartz, C. (2001). Sorting out the Web: Approaches to subject access. Westport, Conn.: Ablex Pub.
* Shera, J. H., & Egan, M. E. (Eds.) (1951). Bibliographic organization: Papers presented before the Fifteenth Annual Conference of the Graduate Library School, July 24-29, 1950. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
* Sicilia, M.-A. (Ed.) (2014). Handbook of metadata, semantics and ontologies. Singapore: World Scientific.
* Sikos, L. F. (2015) Mastering structured data on the semantic web. Berkeley, CA: Apress.
* Smiraglia, R. P. (2001). The nature of a work: Implications for the organization of knowledge. Lanham, Md.: Scarecrow Press.
* Smiraglia, R. P. (Ed.) (2002). Works as entities for information retrieval. New York: Haworth Information Press. [Co-published simultaneously as Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, v. 33, nos. 3/4]
* Smiraglia, R. P. (Ed.) (2012). Metadata: A cataloger's primer. New York: Routledge. [Co-published simultaneously as Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, v. 40, no. 3/4]
* Smiraglia, R. P. (2014). The elements of knowledge organization. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
* Smiraglia, R. P. (2015). Domain analysis for knowledge organization: Tools for ontology extraction. Waltham, MA: Chandos Publishing.
* Smiraglia, R. P., & Lee, H.-L. (Eds.) (2012). Cultural frames of knowledge. Wurzburg: Ergon-Verlag.
* Smiraglia, R. P., & Lee, H.-L. (Eds.) (2015). Ontology for knowledge organization. Wurzburg: Ergon-Verlag.
* Smiraglia, R. P., Riva, P., & Žumer, M. (Eds.) (2013). The FRBR family of conceptual models: Toward a linked bibliographic future. London: Routledge. [Co-published simultaneously as Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, vol. 50, issue 5-7]
* Smith, G. (2008). Tagging: People-powered metadata for the social web. Berkeley, CA: New Riders. [簡體字中譯本：《標籤系統:為社會化網路注入源於用戶的元數據》]
* Smith-Yoshimura, K. (2020). Transitioning to the next generation of metadata. Dublin, OH: OCLC Research. https://doi.org/10.25333/rqgd-b343
* Spencer, J. S., & Millson-Martula, C. (Eds.) (2014). Discovery tools: The next generation of library research. London: Routledge.
* Spiteri, L. F. (Ed.) (2016). Managing metadata in web-scale discovery systems. London: Facet Publishing.
* Stock, W. G., & Stock, M. (2015). Handbook of information science. Berlin: De Gruyter.
* Stuart, D. (2011). Facilitating access to the web of data: A guide for librarians. London: Facet Publishing.
* Stuart, D. (2016). Practical ontologies for information professionals. London: Facet Publishing.
* Svenonius, E. (Ed.) (1989). The conceptual foundations of descriptive cataloging. San Diego: Academic Press.
* Svenonius, E. (2000). The intellectual foundation of information organization. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2000.
* Sylva, L. (Ed.) (2014). Cataloging and classification: trends, transformations, teaching, and training. Uxbridge: Koros.
* Szostak, R., Gnoli, C., & López-Huertas, M. (2016). Interdisciplinary knowledge organization. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
* Taylor, A. G. (Ed.) (2007). Understanding FRBR: What it is and how it will affect our retrieval tools. Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited.
* Willer, M., & Dunsire, G. (2013). Bibliographic information organization in the semantic web. Oxford : Chandos Pub.
* Williamson, N. J., & Beghtol, C. (Eds.) (2003). Knowledge organization and classification in international information retrieval. Binghamton, N.Y.: Haworth Information Press. [Co-published simultaneously as Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, volume 37, numbers 1/2]
* Williamson, N. J., & Hudon, M. (1992). Classification research for knowledge representation and organization. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
* Wilson, P. (1968). Two kinds of power: An essay on bibliographical control. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
* Wood, D., Zaidman, M., & Ruth, L. (2014). Linked data: Structured data on the Web. Shelter Island: Manning.
* Zhang, Y., & Salaba, A. (2009). Implementing FRBR in libraries: Key issues and future directions. New York: Neal-Schuman Publishers.
* Zeng, M. L., & Qin, J. (2022). Metadata (3rd ed.). London: Facet Publishing. [Companion Website: http://metadataetc.org/book-website2nd/ ]
* Žumer, M., Zeng, M. L., & Salaba, A. (2012). FRSAD: Conceptual modeling of aboutness. Santa Barbara, Calif.: Libraries Unlimited.
* Zwierski, M., Fountain, J. F., & McCroskey, M. (Eds.) (2021). Cataloging correctly for kids: An introduction to the tools and practices. Chicago: ALA.
[Useful Web Sites]
* ISKO Knowledge Organization Literature http://www.isko.org/lit.html
* ISKO Encyclopedia for Knowledge Organization http://www.isko.org/cyclo/
* Knowledge Organization (Official Journal of the International Society for Knowledge Organization) 電子版：https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/zeitschrift/0943-7444
* Proceedings from North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization (NASKO) https://journals.lib.washington.edu/index.php/nasko/index
* Cataloging and Metadata Commons http://network.bepress.com/social-and-behavioral-sciences/library-and-information-science/cataloging-and-metadata/
* Concepts in Library & Information Science and Knowledge Organization compiled by Birger Hjørland https://web.archive.org/web/20160529183249/http://www.iva.dk/bh/Core%20Concepts%20in%20LIS/home.htm
* The Epistemological Lifeboat: Epistemology and Philosophy of Science for Information Scientists compiled by Birger Hjørland and Jeppe Nicolaisen. https://web.archive.org/web/20180226161042/http://lifeboat.iva.ku.dk/
* Lifeboat for Knowledge Organization compiled by Birger Hjørland http://arkiv.iva.ku.dk/kolifeboat/ or https://web.archive.org/web/20181213150550/http://arkiv.inf.ku.dk/KoLifeboat/index.htm
* Wikidata: WikiProject PCC Wikidata Pilot https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_PCC_Wikidata_Pilot
* Wikidata Professional Development Training Modules https://dashboard.wikiedu.org/training/wikidata-professional
* W3C (2014a). RDF 1.1 primer. https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-primer/
* W3C (2014b). RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/ |
|
評量方式
(僅供參考) |
|
No. |
項目 |
百分比 |
說明 |
|
1. |
課堂報告（Class presentations） |
10% |
每週有三篇指定文獻，分別由三位同學負責導讀及引導討論。
負責導讀的同學請至少準備兩道問題以供討論。
|
2. |
課堂參與 |
10% |
本課程為研討性質，請踴躍提問及分享看法。
出席情況視為課堂參與的一部份
|
3. |
每週文獻摘要 |
15% |
針對每週指定閱讀之三篇文獻，每篇各撰寫300-500字摘要，每週上課時繳交 |
4. |
文獻讀後心得書面報告 |
15% |
繳交日期：4/30 |
5. |
期末 term paper |
50% |
繳交日期：6月7日 中午12:00 以前 |
|
|
針對學生困難提供學生調整方式 |
|
上課形式 |
|
|
作業繳交方式 |
延長作業繳交期限 |
|
考試形式 |
|
|
其他 |
由師生雙方議定 |
|
|
週次 |
日期 |
單元主題 |
|
第1週 |
2/20 |
Introduction / Bibliographic Control in General / Trends
* 藍文欽(2021) 資訊組織研究文獻回顧（2010-2020）。在吳美美編，圖書資訊學研究回顧與前瞻2.0，第一章。
* Hjørland, B. (2023). Bibliographical control. Knowledge Organization, 50(4), 301-315. Also available in ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization, https://www.isko.org/cyclo/control
基本概念回顧，任意瀏覽至少下列文獻之一：
* Salaba, A., & Chan, L. M. (2023). Cataloging and classification: An introduction (5th ed.). Lanham, MD.: Rowman & Littlefield. Chapter 1.
* Joudrey, D. N., & Taylor, A. G. (2018). The organization of information (4th ed.). Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited. Chapter 1.
* Joudrey, D. N., Taylor, A. G., & Miller, D. P. (2015). Introduction to cataloging and classification (11th ed.). Santa Barbara: Libraries Unlimited. Chapter 1.
* Rubin, R. E. (2016). Foundations of library and information science (4th ed.). Chicago: Neal-Schuman. Chapter 6. |
|
第2週 |
2/27 |
Foundations for Knowledge Organization (KO)
* Hider, P. (2018). The terminological and disciplinary origins of information and knowledge organization. Education for Information, 34(1), 135-61. [參閱：吳美美(2017)。關於網路時代知識組織的幾個思考。圖書館學與資訊科學，43(1)，211-235。]
* Smiraglia, R. P. (2014). The elements of knowledge organization (pp.7-32). Cham: Springer International Publishing. [“About Theory of Knowledge Organization” & “Philosophy: Underpinnings of Knowledge Organization”]
* Gnoli (2020). Introduction to knowledge organization. Chapter 3, Structural principles in knowledge organization
[延伸閱讀]
* Hjørland, B. (2016). Knowledge organization. Knowledge Organization, 43(6), 475-84. Also available in ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization, http://www.isko.org/cyclo/knowledge_organization
* Andersen, J., & Skouvig, L. (2006). Knowledge organization: A sociohistorical analysis and critique. The Library Quarterly, 76(3), 300-322.
* Gnoli (2020). Introduction to knowledge organization. Chapter 2, Theories of knowledge organization
* Hjørland, B. (2013). Theories of knowledge organization: Theories of knowledge. Knowledge Organization, 40(3), 169-181. |
|
第3週 |
3/5 |
Fundamental Issues (cont.)
* Shera, J. H. (1965). Foundations of a theory of bibliography. In J. H. Shera, Libraries and the organization of knowledge (pp. 18-33). London: Crosby Lockwood & Son.
* Wilson, P. (1968). Two kinds of power: An essay on bibliographical control. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Chapter 2, Describing and Exploiting. [可參考下列文章中作者對Wilson觀點的解讀：(1) Hjørland, B. (2023). Bibliographical control. Knowledge Organization, 50(4), 301-315. (2) White, H. D. (2019). Patrick Wilson. Knowledge Organization, 46(4), 279-307.]
* Friedman, A., & Thellefsen, M. (2011). Concept theory and semiotics in knowledge organization. Journal of Documentation, 67(4), 644-674. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411111145034
[延伸閱讀]
* Hjørland, B. (2015). Theories are knowledge organizing systems (KOS). Knowledge Organization, 42(2), 113-128. Also available in ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization, https://www.isko.org/cyclo/theory
* Mai, J-E. (1999). A postmodern theory of knowledge organization. Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting, 36, 547-556. http://jenserikmai.info/Papers/1999_APostmodernTheoryOfKnowledgeOrganization.pdf
* Nahotko, M. (2015). Transactional reading theory in information organization. ZIN, 53(2), 84-105. https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/bitstream/handle/item/23868/nahotko_transactional_reading_theory_in_information_organization_2015.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
* Broughton, V. (2014). Faceted classification as a general theory for knowledge organization. In K. S. Raghvan & A. Neelameghan (Eds.), Knowledge organization: From libraries to the web (pp. 37-56). New Delhi: Ess Ess Publications.
* Leazer, G. H. (2021). Strong and weak universalism in bibliographic services. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 59(6), 597-617. |
|
第4週 |
3/12 |
Units in Information Organization: Data / Document / Work
* Hjørland, B. (2018). Data (with big data and database semantics). Knowledge Organization 45(8), 685-708. Also available in ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization, https://www.isko.org/cyclo/data
* Buckland, M. (2018). Document theory. Knowledge Organization 45(5), 425-436. Also available in ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization, https://www.isko.org/cyclo/document
* Holden, C. (2020). The bibliographic work: History, theory, and practice. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 59(2/3), 77-96.
[延伸閱讀]
* 關於work較詳細的討論，請參考：Smiraglia, R. P. (2001). The nature of a work: Implications for the organization of knowledge. Lanham, Md.: Scarecrow Press. 以及M. M. Yee所撰 “What is a work?” Part 1-Part 4 系列文章(分期刊載於Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, v.19-v.20)
* Coyle, K. (2016). FRBR before and after: A look at our bibliographic models. Chap. 1, The Work (pp. 3-28).
* Glushko, R. J. (Ed.) (2016). The discipline of organizing (4th ed. Core Concept ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Chapter 4, Resources in Organizing Systems. https://ischools.org/resources/Documents/Discipline%20of%20organizing/Core%20Concepts/TDO4-Core-CC-Chapter4.pdf
* Hjørland, B. (n. d.). Units or entities in knowledge organization (KO). What is being organized? https://arkiv.iva.ku.dk//kolifeboat/HISTORY%20&%20THEORY/units_in_knowledge_organization.htm
* Holden, C. (2015). The definition of the work entity for pieces of recorded sound. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 53:8, 873-894.
* Smiraglia, R. P. (2008). Rethinking what we catalog: Documents as cultural artifacts. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 45(3), 25-37.
* Smiraglia, R. P. (2019). Work. Knowledge Organization, 46(4), 308-319. Also available in ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization, http://www.isko.org/cyclo/work |
|
第5週 |
3/19 |
IFLA Library Reference Model (LRM) / Cataloging Research
* Žumer, M. (2018). IFLA Library Reference Model (IFLA LRM): Harmonisation of the FRBR family. Knowledge Organization, 45(4), 310-318. Also available from ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization, https://www.isko.org/cyclo/lrm
* Arastoopoor, S. (2020). Users' perception of navigating bibliographic families from IFLA-LRM perspective. Library Hi Tech, 40(1), 265-280. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-12-2019-0240
[Note: 上列兩篇由同一位同學導讀]
* Budanović, M. P., & Žumer, M. (2021). Prototype cataloging interface based on the IFLA Library Reference Model (LRM). Part 1: Conceptual design. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 59(7), 619-643.
* Clarke, R. I. (2018). Cataloging research by design: A taxonomic approach to understanding research questions in cataloging. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 56(8), 683-701.
[延伸閱讀]
* IFLA的FRBR概念模式已被LRM取代，若想回顧FRBR，請參閱下列前兩項文獻
* IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (2009). Functional requirements for bibliographic records: Final report. https://cdn.ifla.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/assets/cataloguing/frbr/frbr_2008.pdf
* Taylor, A. G. (2007). An introduction to Functional Requirement for Bibliographic Records (FRBR). In A. G. Taylor (Ed), Understanding FRBR: What it is and how it will affect our retrieval tools (pp. 1-19). Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited.
* Riva, P., Le Bœuf, P., & Žumer, M. (2017). IFLA Library Reference Model: A conceptual model for bibliographic information (December, 2017 rev.) https://repository.ifla.org/bitstream/123456789/40/1/ifla-lrm-august-2017_rev201712.pdf
* 陳和琴(2021)。IFLA Library Reference Model與RDA。RDA basic資訊組織數位課程。https://catweb.ncl.edu.tw/sites/default/files/upload/training/02-2_IFLA-LRM%20and%20RDA.pdf
* Budanović, M. P., & Žumer, M. (2021b). Prototype cataloging interface based on the IFLA Library Reference Model (LRM). Part 2: Usability evaluation. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 59(7), 644-668.
* Strader, C. R. (2021). Cataloging to support information literacy: The IFLA Library Reference Model’s user tasks in the context of the Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 59(5), 442-476. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2021.1939828
[Cataloging Research / Cataloging Professionals]
Terrill, L. J. (2016). The state of cataloging research: An analysis of peer-reviewed journal literature, 2010–2014. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 54(8), 593-611.
瀏覽ALCTS Cataloging Competencies Task Force (2023). Core Competencies for Cataloging and Metadata Professional Librarians (revised version) https://alair.ala.org/bitstream/handle/11213/20799/REVISED_CoreCompetencies_Cataloging_Metadata_2023.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Boydston, J. M. K., & Leysen, J. M. (2014). ARL cataloger librarian roles and responsibilities now and in the future. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 52 (2), 229-250.
Joudrey, D. N., & McGinnis, R. (2014). Graduate education for information organization, cataloging, and metadata. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 52 (5), 506-550.
Park, J.-R., Lu, C., & Marion, L. (2009). Cataloging professionals in the digital environment: A content analysis of job descriptions. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(4), 844-857.
|
|
第6週 |
3/26 |
Resource Description Framework (RDF) / Linked Data
[繳交期末報告題目概述]
基本背景：
* Berners-Lee, T. (2006). Linked data. Retrieved from https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html
* W3C (2014). RDF 1.1 primer. Retrieved from https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-primer/
* W3C )2014). Best practices for publishing linked data. Retrieved from https://www.w3.org/TR/ld-bp/
[本週指定閱讀]：
* Gandon, F., Krummenacher, R., Han, S.-K., & Toma, I. (2011). Semantic annotation and retrieval: RDF. In J. Domingue, D. Fensel, & J. A. Hendler (Eds.), Handbook of semantic web technologies (pp.119-155). Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
* Bushman, B., Anderson, D., & Fu, G. (2015). Transforming the Medical Subject Headings into linked data: Creating the authorized version of MeSH in RDF. Journal of Library Metadata, 15(3/4), 157-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2015.1099967
* Ullah, I., Khusro, S., Ullah, A., & Naeem, M. (2018). An overview of the current state of linked and open data in cataloging. Information Technology and Libraries, 37(4), 47-80. https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v37i4.10432
[Examples & Useful Sites]
* Library of Congress. Linked Data Services: Authorities and Vocabularies http://id.loc.gov/
* Getty Vocabularies as Linked Open Data http://www.getty.edu/research/tools/vocabularies/lod/
* OCLC Linked Data https://www.oclc.org/developer/develop/linked-data.en.html
* VIAF Linked Data http://viaf.org/viaf/data/
* 臺灣鏈結資源系統 LDT@Library https://ld.ncl.edu.tw/
* EUCLID Linked Data Training Modules -- http://euclid-project.eu/index.html
* Free Your Metadata: Learn how to get more value out of metadata easily. http://freeyourmetadata.org/ [由Linked Data for Libraries, Archives, and Museums一書的作者現身說法，提供詳細步驟與資料，帶領學習者逐步掌握如何做]
[延伸閱讀]
* Willer, M., & Dunsire, G. (2013). Bibliographic information organization in the semantic web. Oxford : Chandos Pub. 是值得瀏覽的專書，本校有電子版
* 陳淑君（2021）。從知識本體及鏈結資料角度探討數位人文學的資訊組織與檢索。在吳美美編，圖書資訊學研究回顧與前瞻2.0，第二章。
* 陳亞寧（2020）。書目資訊鏈結資料化方法之研究：書目本體論、鏈結型機讀編目與Schema.org。教育資料與圖書館學，57(3)，379-412。
* Alemu, G., Stevens, B., Ross, P., & Chandler, J. (2012). Linked data for libraries: Benefits of a conceptual shift from library-specific record structures to RDF-based data models. New Library World, 113(11-12), 549-570.
* Allemang, D., & Hendler, J. (2011). Semantic Web for the working ontologist modeling in RDFS and OWL (2nd ed.). Waltham, MA: Morgan Kaufmann/Elsevier. Chapter 3, RDF--The basis of the Semantic Web.
* Heath, T., & Bizer, C. (2011). Linked data: Evolving the Web into a global data space. San Francisco: Morgan & Claypool. Chap. 1 & 2. [HTML version: http://linkeddatabook.com/editions/1.0/]
* Lampert, C. K., & Southwick, S. B. (2013). Leading to Linking: Introducing linked data to academic library digital collections, Journal of Library Metadata, 13(2/3), 230-253. DOI: 10.1080/19386389.2013.826095
* Williams, J. (2021). From silo to the Web: Library cataloging data in an open environment. In S. S. Hines (Ed.), Technical services in the 21st century (p. 175-191). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing. (Advances in Library Administration and Organization, 42, 175-191.) |
|
第7週 |
4/2 |
Resources Description / Cataloging Ethics
* Hjørland, B. (2023). Description: Its meaning, epistemology, and use with emphasis on information science. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 74(13), 1532-1549. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24834
* Dobreski, B. (2020). Descriptive cataloging: The history and practice of describing library resources. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 59(2/3), 225-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2020.1864693
* Martin, J. M. (2021). Records, responsibility, and power: An overview of cataloging ethics. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 59(2/3), 281-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2020.1871458
[延伸閱讀]
[Resource Description / Cataloging Rules]
* Bernstein, S. (2014). Beyond content, media, and carrier: RDA carrier characteristics. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 52(5), 463-486.
* Glushko, R. J. (Ed.). (2016). The discipline of organizing (4th Core Concepts ed.). Cambridge, MA: O’Reilly Media. Chapter V, Resources Description and Metadata, retrieved from https://ischools.org/resources/Documents/Discipline%20of%20organizing/Core%20Concepts/TDO4-Core-CC-Chapter5.pdf
* McCallum, C., Gilbertson, K., Kelley, S., & Corbett, L. E. (2017). Can RDA content, media, and carrier coding improve discovery facet mapping? Library Resources & Technical Services, 61(2), 93-101.
* Oliver, C. (2021). Introducing RDA: A guide to the basics after 3R (2nd ed.). Chicago: ALA. Chapter 5, RDA: Some key aspects.
[Cataloging Ethics]
* Chan, M., Danielsb, J., Furgerc, S., Rasmussenh, D., Shoemaker, E., & Snow, K. (2022). The development and future of the cataloguing code of ethics. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 60(8), 786-806.
* Olson, H., & Schlege, R. (2001). Standardization, objectivity, and user focus: A Meta-analysis of subject access critiques. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 32(2), 61-80.
* Ridi, R. (2013). Ethical values for knowledge organization. Knowledge Organization, 40(3), 187-196.
* Snow, K. (2015). An examination of the practical and ethical issues surrounding false memoirs in cataloging practice. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 53(8), 927-947.
* Snow, K., & Shoemaker, B. (2020). Defining cataloging ethics: Practitioner perspectives. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 58(6), 533-546. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2020.1795767 |
|
第8週 |
4/9 |
Next-Generation Catalogs / Discovery Services / Personal Information Organization
* Wells, D. (2020). Online public access catalogues and library discovery systems. In ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization, https://www.isko.org/cyclo/opac
* Raieli, R. (2022). Web-scale discovery services: Principles, applications, discovery tools and development hypotheses. Chapter 3, Search and discovery tools. [3.2 The main discovery systems 瀏覽即可]
* Oh, K. E. (2019). Personal information organization in everyday life: Modeling the process. Journal of Documentation, 75(3), 667-691.
[延伸閱讀]
* Barton, J., & Mak, L. (2012). Old hopes, new possibilities: Next-generation catalogues and the centralization of access. Library Trends, 61(1), 83-106.
* Bossaller, J. S., & Snady, H. M. (2017). Documenting the conversation: A systematic review of library discovery layers. College and Research Libraries, 78(5), 602-619.
* Breeding, M. (2014). Discovery product functionality. Library Technology Reports, 50(1), 5-32.
* Breeding, M. (2015). The future of library resource discovery: A white paper commissioned by the NISO Discovery to Delivery (D2D) Topic Committee. Baltimore: NISO. https://groups.niso.org/apps/group_public/download.php/14487/future_library_resource_discovery.pdf
* Nagy, A. (2011). Library Technology Reports, 47(7), 1-27. [整本都是關於next-generation catalog]
* Raieli, R. (2022). Web-scale discovery services: Principles, applications, discovery tools and development hypotheses. Chapter 2, The evolution of the search systems.
* Oh, K. E. (2021). Social aspects of personal information organization. Journal of Documentation, 77(2), 558-575.
Note: 另一值得留意的發展是open source discovery service tools, e.g.,
https://devopscube.com/open-source-service-discovery/ ; https://stackshare.io/service-discovery |
|
第9週 |
4/16 |
Catalog Use / Cataloging Quality and Assessment
* Hider, P., & Tan, K.-C. (2008). Constructing record quality: Measures based on catalog use. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 46(4), 338-361.
* Snow, K. (2017). Defining, assessing, and rethinking quality cataloging. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 55 (7/8), 438-455.
* Pettitt, K. (2019). Cataloging and metadata assessment: An overview. In K. A. Edwards, & M. Leonard (Eds.), Assessment strategies in technical services (pp.155-182). Chicago: ALA.
[延伸閱讀]
* Borgman, C. L. (1996). Why are online catalogs still hard to use? Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(7): 493-503.
* Calhoun, D. et al. (2009). Online catalogs: What users and librarians want: An OCLC report. Dublin: OCLC.
* Hoffman, G. L. (2009). Meeting users’ needs in cataloging: What is the right thing to do?, Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 47(7), 631-641.
* Markey, K. (2007) Twenty-five years of end-user searching, Part 1: research findings. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58 (8), 1071-1081. Part 2: Future research directions. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58 (8), 1123-1130.
* Miksa, F. (2009). Information organization and the mysterious information user. Libraries & the Cultural Record, 44(3), 343–372.
* Petrucciani, A. (2015). Quality of library catalogs and value of (good) catalogs. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 53 (3/4), 303-313. |
|
第10週 |
4/23 |
Bibliographic Relationships / Literary Warrant / Facet Analysis
* Tillett, B. B. (2001). Bibliographic relationships. In C. A. Bean, & R. Green (Eds), Relationships in the organization of knowledge (pp. 19-35). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
* Barité, M. (2018). Literary warrant. Knowledge Organization 45(6), 517-536. Also available in ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization, https://www.isko.org/cyclo/literary_warrant
* Broughton, V. (2023). Facet analysis: The evolution of an idea. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 61(5/6), 411-438.
[延伸閱讀]
* Green, R. (2001). Relationships in the organization of knowledge: An overview. In C. A. Bean, & R. Green (Eds), Relationships in the organization of knowledge (pp. 3-18). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
* Moreira, W., & Martínez-Ávila, D. (2018). Concept relationships in knowledge organization systems: Elements for analysis and common research among fields. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 56(1), 19-39, https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2017.1357157
* Niu, J. (2013). Hierarchical relationships in the bibliographic universe. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 51(5), 473-490.
* Park, T. K., & Morrison, A. M. (2017). The nature and characteristics of bibliographic relationships in RDA cataloging records in OCLC at the beginning of RDA implementation. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 55 (6), 361-386.
* Tillett, B. B. (1991). A taxonomy of bibliographic relationships. Library Resources & Technical Services, 35, 150-158.
[Literary Warrant]
* Rodriguez, R. D. (2008). Hulme’s concept of literary warrant. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 5(1), 17-26.
* Beghtol, C. (1986). Semantic validity: Concepts of warrant in bibliographic classification systems. Library Resources & Technical Services, 30(2), 109-125.
* Beghtol, C. (1995). Domain analysis, literary warrant, and consensus, the case of fiction studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(1), 30-44.
[Facet Analysis]
* Hjørland, B. (2013). Facet analysis: The logical approach to knowledge organization. Information Processing and Management, 49(2), 545–57. Also available online from IEKO: https://www.isko.org/cyclo/facet_analysis
* La Barre, K. (2010). Facet analysis. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 44, 243-284. |
|
第11週 |
4/30 |
Classification
[繳交讀書心得]
* Kwasnik, B. (1999). The role of classification in knowledge representation and discovery. Library Trends, 48(1), 22-47.
* Bullard, Julia Amber (2017), Classification design: understanding the decisions between theory and consequence. Unpublished dissertation, University of Texas Austin. https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/c6cbdaab-4008-4747-85b1-907354c156ec/content Literature review chapter (pp.22-65).
* Bell, H. K. (1991). Indexing fiction: A story of complexity. The Indexer, 17,(4), 251-256.
* Saarti, J. (2019). Fictional literature, classification and indexing. Knowledge Organization 46(4), 320-332. Also available in ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization, https://www.isko.org/cyclo/fictional
[Note: 以上兩篇由同一位同學負責]
[延伸閱讀]
* Beghtol, C. (1989). Access to fiction: A problem in classification theory and practise, Part 1. International Classification, 16(3), 134-140.
* Beghtol, C. (1990). Access to fiction: A problem in classification theory and practise, Part 2. International Classification, 17(1), 21-27.
* Beghtol, C. (1994). The classification of fiction: The development of a system based on theoretical principles. Metuchen: Scarecrow Press.
* Clarke, R. I. (2021). Library classification systems in the U.S.: Basic ideas and examples. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 59(2/3), 203-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2021.1881008
* Hjørland, B. (2017). Classification. Knowledge Organization, 44(2), 97-128. Also available in ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization, http://www.isko.org/cyclo/classification
* McTavish, J. (2015). Everyday life classification practices and technologies. Journal of Documentation, 71(5), 957-975.
* Šauperl, A. (2013). Four views of a novel: Characteristics of novels as described by publishers, librarians, literary theorists, and readers. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 51(6), 624–654.
* Shera, J. H. (1965). Classification as the basis of bibliographic organization. In Libraries and the organization of knowledge (pp. 77-96). London: Crosby Lockwook & Son.
* Smiraglia, R. P., & den Heuvel, C. V. (2013). Classifications and concepts: Towards an elementary theory of knowledge interaction. Journal of Documentation, 69(3), 360-383.
*Svenonius, E. (1992). Classification: Prospects, problems and possibilities. In N. J. Williamson, & M. Hudon (Eds.), Classification research for knowledge representation and organization (pp. 5-25). Amsterdam: Elsevier. |
|
第12週 |
5/7 |
Subject Analysis – Verbal / Indexing / Aboutness
請先瀏覽
* MeSH Browser -- http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/2007/MBrowser.html
* Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) -- http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/umlsmain.html http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/pdf/UMLS_Basics.pdf
* Weinberg, B. H. (1988). Why indexing fails the researcher. The Indexer, 16(1): 3-6.
[本週閱讀資料]
* Smith, C. (2021). Controlled vocabularies: Past, present and future of subject access. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 59(2/3), 186-202.
* Hjørland, B. (2018). Indexing: Concepts and theory. Knowledge Organization, 45(7), 609-39. Also available in ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization, http://www.isko.org/cyclo/indexing
* Holley, R. M., & Joudrey, D. N. (2020). Aboutness and conceptual analysis: A review. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 59(2/3), 159-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2020.1856992
[延伸閱讀]
* Beghtol, C. (1986). Bibliographic classification theory and text linguistics: Aboutness analysis, intertextuality and the cognitive act of classifying documents. Journal of Documentation, 42, 84-113.
* Gross, T., Taylor, A. G., & Joudrey, D. N. (2015). Still a lot to lose: The role of controlled vocabulary in keyword searching. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 53(1), 1-39.
* Furner, J. (2012). FRSAD and the ontology of subjects of works. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 50(5-7), 494-516. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2012.681269
* Harper, C. A. & Tillett, B. B. (2007). Library of Congress controlled vocabularies and their application to the Semantic Web. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 43 (3/4), 47-68.
* Hjorland, B. (2001). Towards a theory of aboutness, subject, topicality, theme, domain, field, content ... and relevance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(9), 774-778.
* Martínez-Ávila, D. & Budd, J. M. (2017). Epistemic warrant for categorizational activities and the development of controlled vocabularies. Journal of Documentation, 73 (4), 700-715.
* Rondeau, S. (2014). The life and times of aboutness: A review of the library and information science literature. Evidence Based Library & Information Practice, 9(1). Retrieved from https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/eblip/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/19091/16224
* Svenonius, E. (2000). The intellectual foundation of information organization. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Chapter 8, Subject Language: Introduction, Vocabulary Selection, and Classification |
|
第13週 |
5/14 |
Domain Analysis / Tagging / Ontology
瀏覽：
吳筱玫（2009）。俗民分類與知識型：Tag的資訊秩序,。中華傳播學刊, 15, 頁3-31。 Available from http://cjc.nccu.edu.tw/word/283312142013.pdf
[本週閱讀資料]
* Hjørland, B. (2002). Domain analysis in information science. Eleven approaches — traditional as well as innovative. Journal of Documentation, 58 (4), 422-462.
* Rafferty, P. (2018). Tagging. Knowledge Organization, 45 (6), 500-516. Also available in ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization, http://www.isko.org/cyclo/tagging
* Noy, N. F., & McGuinness, D. L. (2001). Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. http://o2k.stanford.edu/people/dlm/papers/ontology-tutorial-noy-mcguinness.pdf
[延伸閱讀]
[Domain Analysis]
* Beghtol, C. (1994). Domain analysis, literary warrant, and consensus: The case of fiction studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(1), 30-44.
* Hjørland, B. (2016). Domain analysis. Knowledge Organization, 44(6), 436-464. Also available from: http://www.isko.org/cyclo/domain_analysis
* López-Huertas, M. J. (2015). Domain analysis for interdisciplinary knowledge domains. Knowledge Organization, 42 (8), 570-580.
* Smiraglia, R. P. (2015). Domain analysis as a methodological paradigm in knowledge organization. In Domain analysis for knowledge organization: Tools for ontology extraction (pp.19-39).
* Graf, A. M. (2018). Facets of graffiti art and street art documentation online: A domain and content analysis. Unpublished dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee.
[Tagging/Folksonomy]
* Bullard, J. (2018). Curated folksonomies: Three implementations of structure through human judgment. Knowledge Organization, 45(8), 643-652.
* Gerolimos, M. (2013). Tagging for libraries: A review of the effectiveness of tagging systems for library catalogs. Journal of Library Metadata, 13 (1), 36-58.
* Kipp, M. I., & Campbell, D. G. (2010). Searching with tags: Do tags help users find things? Knowledge Organization, 37(4), 239-255.
* Munk, T. B., & Mørk, K. (2007). Folksonomy, The power law & the significance of the least effort. Knowledge Organization, 34(1), 16-33.
* Spiteri, L. F. (2010). Incorporating facets into social tagging applications: An analysis of current trends. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 48(1), 94-109.
* Trant, J. (2009). Studying social tagging and folksonomy: A review and framework. Journal of Digital Information, 10(1). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10150/105375
* Windleharth, T. W., Jett, J., Schmalz, M., & Lee, J. H. (2016). Full steam ahead: A conceptual analysis of user-supplied tags on steam. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 54(7), 418-441.
[Ontology]
* Gilchrist, A. (2003). Thesauri, taxonomies and ontologies: An etymological note. Journal of Documentation, 59(1), 7-18.
* Gruber, T. R. (1995). Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. International Journal Human-Computer Studies, 43(5-6), 907-928.
* Guarino, N. (1995). Formal ontology, conceptual analysis and knowledge representation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43(5-6), 625–640.
* King, B. E., & Reinold, K. (2008). Finding the concept, not just the word: A librarian's guide to ontologies and semantics. Oxford: Chandos.
* Lacasta J., Nogueras-Iso, J., Soria, F. J. Z. Terminological ontologies design, management and practical applications. Boston, MA.: Springer eBooks, 2010. Chapter 1: Ontology basic concepts.
* Moreira, A., Alvarenga, L., & de Paiva Oliveira, A. (2004). Thesaurus and ontology: A study of the definitions found in the computer and information science literature, by means of an analytical-synthetic method. Knowledge Organization, 31(4), 231-244.
* Stuart, D. (2016). Practical ontologies for information professionals. London: Facet Publishing. |
|
第14週 |
5/21 |
BIBFRAME / Interoperability / Authority Control
參考：
* A brief introduction to BIBFRAME 2.0 by Kelley McGrath http://nwcentral.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/McGrath_Bibframe_OLA_2017.pdf
* BIBFRAME （Bibliographic Framework） from Librarianship Studies and Information Technology https://www.librarianshipstudies.com/2017/12/bibframe.html
[本週閱讀資料]
* Kim, M., Chen, M., Montgomery, D. (2021). Moving toward BIBFRAME and a linked data environment. In S. S. Hines (Ed.), Technical services in the 21st century (p. 131-154). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing. (Advances in Library Administration and Organization, 42, 131-154.)
* Zeng, M. L. (2019). Interoperability. Knowledge Organization, 46(2), 122-146. Also available in ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization, http://www.isko.org/cyclo/interoperability
* Wiederhold, R. A., & Reeve, G. F. (2021). Authority control today: Principles, practices, and trends. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 59(2/3), 129-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2021.1881009
[延伸閱讀]
* Cole, T. W., Han, M.-J., Weathers, W. F., & Joyner, E. (2013). Library MARC records into linked open data: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Library Metadata, 13(2/3), 163-196.
* Park, J.-R., Richards, L. L., & Brenza, A. (2019). Benefits and challenges of BIBFRAME. Library Hi Tech, 37 (3), 549-565.
* Sanderson, R. (2015). Analysis of the BIBFRAME ontology for linked data best practices, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dIy-FgQsH67Ay0T0O0ulhyRiKjpf_I0AVQ9v8FLmPNo/edit#heading=h.310o1a8282cm
* Schreur, P. (2018). The evolution of BIBFRAME: From MARC surrogate to Web conformant data model. Paper presented at: IFLA WLIC 2018 – Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Retrieved from http://library.ifla.org/2202/1/141-schreur-en.pdf
* Taniguchi, S. (2018). Mapping and merging of IFLA Library Reference Model and BIBFRAME 2.0. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 56(5/6), 427-454.
[Authority Control / Identity Management]
* Armitage, A., Cuneo, M. J., Quintana, I., & Carlson Young, K. (2020). ISNI and traditional authority work. JLIS.it, 11(1), 151–163. Retrieved from https://www.jlis.it/article/view/12554/11378
* Cannan, J. P., Frank, P., & Hawkins, L. (2019). LC/NACO authority file in the Library of Congress BIBFRAME Pilots. Journal of Library Metadata, 19 (1/2), 39-51.
* Downey, M. (2019). Assessing author identifiers: Preparing for a linked data approach to name authority control in an institutional repository context. Journal of Library Metadata, 19 (1/2), 117-136.
* Heng, G., Cole, T. W., Tian, T., & Han, M.-J. (2021). Rethinking authority reconciliation process. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 60(1), 45-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2021.1992554
* Jin, Q., & Kudeki, D. (2019). Identity and access management for libraries. Technical Services Quarterly, 36 (1), 44-60.
* Powell, J., Hoover, C., Gordon, A., & Mittrach, M. (2019), Bridging identity challenges: Why and how one library plugged ORCiD into their enterprise. Library Hi Tech, 37 (3), 625-639.
* Zhu, L. (2019). The future of authority control: Issues and trends in the linked data environment. Journal of Library Metadata, 19(3/4), 215-238. |
|
第15週 |
5/28 |
Class Presentation |
|
第16週 |
6/4 |
Class Presentation
Note: 6月7日 繳交期末報告（中午12:00以前，請以紙本繳交） |
|