|
課程名稱 |
資訊組織研討
Seminar in Information Organization |
|
開課學期 |
110-2 |
|
授課對象 |
文學院 圖書資訊學研究所 |
|
授課教師 |
藍文欽 |
|
課號 |
LIS7013 |
|
課程識別碼 |
126 M0570 |
|
班次 |
|
|
學分 |
3.0 |
|
全/半年 |
半年 |
|
必/選修 |
必修 |
|
上課時間 |
星期二2,3,4(9:10~12:10) |
|
上課地點 |
圖資編目室 |
|
備註 |
限碩士班以上 或 限博士班
總人數上限：20人 |
|
Ceiba 課程網頁 |
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1102LIS7013_IOS |
|
課程簡介影片 |
|
|
核心能力關聯 |
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖 |
|
課程大綱
|
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
|
課程概述 |
資訊組織是藉由描述資訊物件（information objects）之載體與內容，建立代表原件之替代紀錄(surrogate / representation)，並予以系統化的組織，建置成檢索工具，以幫助使用者依其資訊需求查詢、檢索、辨識、評估、及獲取資料。
本課程以本系大學部之「資訊組織一」及「資訊組織二」或碩士班之「資訊蒐集與組織」為先備課程，旨在研討圖書資訊組織與書目控制的理論基礎、原則、標準、相關問題、發展歷史與趨勢等。本課程屬於研討性質，重點在文獻研讀、分享與討論，希望藉此引領同學對資訊組織的相關議題作更深刻的探索與思考。 |
|
課程目標 |
* 熟悉資訊組織之核心概念與基本原理、原則
* 理解資訊組織相關規範與標準的意涵與功用
* 對資訊組織的新興議題與發展趨勢能有所掌握
* 對資訊組織領域的研究議題與方法能有基本認識 |
|
課程要求 |
* 請準時出席，點名未到者，每次扣學期總分2分。
* 上課請踴躍參與討論，毋須在意個人意見是否成熟，重點在意見分享與交換。
* 每位同學負責導讀時，同時需引導討論的進行。
* 作業請依規定的日程準時繳交。 |
|
預期每週課後學習時數 |
|
|
Office Hours |
每週三 12:30~13:30
每週二 12:30~13:30 |
|
指定閱讀 |
請見各週指定閱讀 |
|
參考書目 |
* 卜小蝶(2007)。使用者導向之網路資源組織與檢索。臺北市：文華圖書館管理。
* 何光國(1990)。圖書資訊組織原理。臺北市：三民。
* 余顯強(2019)。XML：資訊組織與傳播核心技術。臺北市：五南。
* 吳美美編(2021)。圖書資訊學研究回顧與前瞻2.0。臺北市：元華文創。
* 陳亞寧、牛惠曼（2021）。圖書館鏈結資料入門指引。臺北市：國家圖書館。
* 張慧銖(2003)。圖書館目錄發展研究。臺北市：文華圖書館管理。
* 張慧銖(2011)。圖書館電子資源組織：從書架到網路。新北市：華藝學術。
* 張慧銖等(2016)。主題分析。新北市：華藝學術。
* 張慧銖等(2017)。資訊組織。新北市：華藝學術。
* Abbas, J. (2010). Structures for organizing knowledge: Exploring taxonomies,
ontologies, and other schemas. New York: Neal-Schuman Publishers.
* Andersen, J., & Skouvig, L. (Eds.) (2017). The organization of knowledge:
Caught between global structures and local meaning. Bingley: Emerald
Publishing.
* Angel, C., & Fuchs, C. (Eds.) (2018). Organization, representation and
description through the digital age: Information in libraries, archives and
museums. Berlin: De Gruyter Saur.
* Auer, S., Bryl, V., & Tramp, S. (Eds.) (2014). Linked open data: Creating
knowledge out of interlinked data: Results of the LOD2 Project. Cham: Springer
International Publishing.
* Baca, M. (Ed.) (2016). Introduction to metadata (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Getty
Information Institute. Retrieved from:
http://www.getty.edu/publications/intrometadata/
* Batley, S. (2007). Information architecture for information professionals.
Oxford: Chandos.
* Bauer, F., & Kaltenbock, M. (2012). Linked open data: The essentials: A quick
start guide for decision makers. Vienna, Austria: Edition mono/monochrom.
* Bean, C. A., & Green, R. (2001). Relationships in the organization of
knowledge. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
* Blair, D. C. (1990). Language and representation in information retrieval.
New York: Elsevier Science Publishers.
* Borgman, C. L. (2000). From Gutenberg to the global information
infrastructure: Access to information in the networked world. Cambridge, Mass.:
The MIT Press.
* Bowker, G., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting thing out: Classification and its
consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
* Broughton, V. (2015). Essential classification (2nd ed.). London: Facet
Publishing.
* Broughton, V. (2020). Facet analysis. London: Facet Publishing. [即將出版，訂
購中]
* Brubaker, J. (2018). Text, lies and cataloging: Ethical treatment of
deceptive works in the library. Jefferson, N.C.: McFarland & Company.
* Caplan, P. (2003). Metadata fundamentals for all librarians. Chicago:
American Library Association, 2003.
* Carlson, S., Lampert, C., Melvin, D., & Washington, A. (2020). Linked data
for the perplexed librarian. Chicago: ALA.
* Carpenter, M., & Svenonius, E. (Eds.) (1985). Foundations of cataloging: A
sourcebook. Littleton, Colo.: Libraries Unlimited.
* Carter, R. C. (2000). Managing cataloging and the organization of
information: Philosophies, practices, and challenges at the onset of the 21st
century. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Information Press. [Co-published
simultaneously as Cataloging & classification quarterly, v. 30, nos. 1 and 2/3]
* Cervone, H. F., & Svensson, L. G. (Eds.) (2015). Linked data and user
interaction: The road ahead. Berlin: De Gruyter Saur.
* Chamber, S. (Ed.) (2013). Catalogue 2.0: The future of the library catalogue.
London: Facet.
* Chan, L. M., Richmond, P. A., & Svenonius, E. (Eds.) (1985). Theory of
subject analysis: A sourcebook. Littleton, Colo.: Libraries Unlimited.
* Chan, L. M., & Salaba, A. (2016). Cataloging and classification: An
introduction (4th ed.). Lanham, MD.: Rowman & Littlefield.
* Coyle, K. (2016). FRBR before and after: A look at our bibliographic models.
Chicago: ALA.
* Coyle, K., et al. (2017). PCC SCS/LDAC Task Group on the Work Entity:
Preliminary white paper. Available from:
https://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/documents/PoCo-
2017/WorkEntitity%20Preliminary%20White%20Paper-2017-09-27.pdf
* Curras, E. (2010). Ontologies, taxonomies and thesauri in systems science and
systematic. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.
* Day, R. E. (2014). Indexing it all: The subject in the age of documentation,
information, and data. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
* Drabenstott, K. M., & Vizine-Goetz, D. (1994). Using subject headings for
online retrieval: Theory, practice, and potential. San Diego: Academic Press.
* Eden, B, L. (Ed.) (2016). Rethinking technical services: New frameworks, new
skill sets, new tools, new roles. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
* Foskett, A. C. (1996). The subject approach to information (5th ed.). London
: Library Association Pub.
* Fricke, M. (2012). Logic and the organization of information. New York:
Springer.
* Garibyan, M., McLeish, S., & Paschoud, J. (2014). Access and identity
management for libraries: Controlling access to online information. London:
Facet.
* Gedikli, F. (2013). Recommender systems and the social web leveraging tagging
data for recommender systems. Wiesbaden: Springer.
* Godby, C. J., Wang, S., & Mixter, J. (2015). Library linked data in the
cloud: OCLC's experiments with new models of resource description. San Rafael,
California: Morgan & Claypool.
* Glushko, R. J. (Ed.). (2013). The discipline of organizing. Cambridge, MA: MIT
Press. [本校訂有電子版]
2016之4th edition有下列三種版本，作者均提供免費下載
-- Core concept edition: https://ischools.org/Discipline-of-Organizing-Core-
Concept
-- Informatics edition: https://ischools.org/Discipline-of-Organizing-
Informatics
-- Professional edition: https://ischools.org/Discipline-of-Organizing-
Professional
* Godby, J. et al. (2019). Creating library linked data with Wikibase: Lessons
learned from Project Passage. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC.
https://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/publications/2019/oclcresearch-
creating-library-linked-data-with-wikibase-project-passage-a4.pdf
* Green, R., Bean, C. A., & Myaeng, S. H. (Eds.) (2002). The semantics of
relationships: An interdisciplinary perspectives. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic
Pub.
* Harpring, P. (2010). Introduction to controlled vocabularies: Terminology for
art, architecture, and other cultural works (online edition). Los Angeles:
Getty Research Institute. Available from:
http://www.getty.edu/research/publications/electronic_publications/intro_contro
lled_vocab/index.html
* Hart, A. (2010). The RDA primer: A guide for the occasional cataloger
[electronic resource]. Santa Barbara, Calif.: Linworth.
* Harth, A., Hose, K., & Schenkel, R. (2014). Linked data management. Boca
Raton : CRC Press/Taylor & Francis.
* Haynes, D. (2018). Metadata for information management and retrieval:
Understanding metadata and its use (2nd ed.). London: Facet Publishing.
* Heath, T., & Bizer, C. (2011). Linked data: Evolving the Web into a global
data space. San Francisco: Morgan & Claypool. HTML version:
http://linkeddatabook.com/editions/1.0/
* Hjorland, B. (1997). Information seeking and subject representation: An
activity-theoretical approach to information science. Westport, Conn.:
Greenwood Press.
* Hlava, M. M. K. (2015). The taxobook: History, theories and concepts of
knowledge organization. Part 1 of a 3-part series. [San Rafael, California]:
Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
* Hodge, G. (2000). Systems of knowledge organization for digital libraries:
Beyond traditional authority files. Washington, DC: The Digital Library
Federation. Retrieved from: http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub91/pub91.pdf
* Hoffman, G. L. (2019). Organizing library collections: Theory and practice.
Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
* Hooland, S. van, & Verborgh, R. (2014). Linked data for libraries, archives
and museums: How to clean, link and publish your metadata. London : Facet
Publishing. [Data and examples available at: http://book.freeyourmetadata.org/]
* Hsieh-Yee, I. (2000). Organizing audiovisual and electronic resources for
access: A cataloging guide. Englewood, Colo.: Libraries Unlimited.
* Hsieh-Yee, I. (2016). Organizing for access with FRBR, RDA, linked data, and
beyond. Santa Barbara: Libraries Unlimited.
* Hyvonen, E. (2012). Publishing and using cultural heritage linked data on the
semantic web. San Rafael, Calif.: Morgan & Claypool.
* Jin, Q. (2012). Demystifying FRAD: Functional requirements for authority
data. Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited.
* Jones, E. & Seikel, M. (Eds.) (2016). Linked data for cultural heritage.
Chicago: ALA.
* Jones, W., Ahronheim, J. R., & Crawford, J. (2002). Cataloging the Web:
Metadata, AACR, and MARC 21. Lanham, Md.: Scarecrow Press.
* Joudrey, D. N., Taylor, A. G., & Miller, D. P. (2015). Introduction to
cataloging and classification (11th ed.). Santa Barbara, California: Libraries
Unlimited. [電子版]
* Jourdrey, D. N., & Taylor, A. G. (2018). The organization of information (4th
ed.). Santa Barbara, California: Libraries Unlimited.
* Konstantinou, N., & Spanos, D.-E. (2015). Materializing the web of linked
data. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
* Latif, A. (2011). Understanding linked open data: For linked data discovery,
consumption, triplification and application development. Saarbrucken: LAP
Lambert Academic Publishing.
* Mackey, T. P., & Jacobson, T. E. (2014). Metaliteracy: Reinventing
information literacy to empower learners. Chicago: ALA.
* Mackey, T. P., & Jacobson, T. E. (Eds.) (2016). Metaliteracy in practice.
Chicago: ALA.
* Mann, T. (1993). Library research models: A guide to classification,
cataloging, and computers. New York : Oxford University Press.
* Marcella, R., & Maltby, A. (Eds.) (2000). The future of classification.
Aldershot, Eng.; Brookfield, VT: Gower.
* Marinho, L. B., et al. (2012). Recommender systems for social tagging
systems. Boston: Springer US.
* Maxwell, R. L. (2008). FRBR: A guide for the perplexed. Chicago: American
Library Association.
* Miller, D. R., and Clarke, K. S. (2004). Putting XML to work in the library:
Tools for improving access and management. Chicago: American Library
Association.
* Mitchell, A. M., & Surratt, B. E. (2005). Cataloging and organizing digital
resources: A how-to-do-it manual for librarians. London: Facet Publishing.
* Oliver, C. (2010). Introducing RDA: A guide to the basics [electronic
resource]. Chicago: American Library Association.
* Olson, H. A., & Boll, J. J. (2001). Subject analysis in online catalogs.
Englewood, Colo.: Libraries Unlimited.
* Park, J.-R., & Howarth, L. C. (Eds.) (2013). New directions in information
organization. Bingley, U.K.: Emerald.
* Pennington, D. R., Spiteri, L. F. (Eds.) (2019). Social tagging in a linked
data environment. London: Facet Publishing.
* Peters, T. A. (1991). The online catalog: A critical examination. Jefferson:
McFarland.
* Peters, I. (2009). Folksonomies: Indexing and retrieval in Web 2.0 (P.
Becker, trans.). Berlin: De Gruyter/Saur.
* Porumbeanu Madge, O.-L., et al. (2017). Ethical issues in library and
information science. United Kingdom: Koros Press Limited.
* Rietveld, L. (2016). Publishing and consuming linked data: Optimizing for the
unknown. Berline: IOS Press.
* Rosenfeld, L., Morville, P., & Arango, J. (2015). Information architecture:
For the web and beyond (4th ed.). Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media. [中譯本：資訊
架構學(臺北市：峰資訊, 2017)]
* Rowley, J., & Farrow, J. (2002). Organizing knowledge: An introduction to
managing access to information (3rd ed.). Aldershot: Ashgate.
* Sandberg, J. (Ed.) (2019). Ethical questions in name authority control.
Sacramento: Library Juice Press. [訂購中]
* Sandberg-Fox, A. M. (2001). Proceedings of the bicentennial conference on
bibliographic control for the new millennium: Confronting the challenges of
networked resources and the Web. Washington, DC : Library of Congress,
Cataloging Distribution Service. Retrieved from:
http://www.loc.gov/catdir/bibcontrol/conference.html
* Schwartz, C. (2001). Sorting out the Web: Approaches to subject access.
Westport, Conn.: Ablex Pub.
* Shera, J. H., & Egan, M. E. (Eds.) (1951). Bibliographic organization: Papers
presented before the Fifteenth Annual Conference of the Graduate Library
School, July 24-29, 1950. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
* Sicilia, M.-A. (Ed.) (2014). Handbook of metadata, semantics and ontologies.
Singapore: World Scientific.
* Sikos, L. F. (2015) Mastering structured data on the semantic web. Berkeley,
CA: Apress.
* Smiraglia, R. P. (2001). The nature of a work: Implications for the
organization of knowledge. Lanham, Md.: Scarecrow Press.
* Smiraglia, R. P. (2015). Domain analysis for knowledge organization: Tools
for ontology extraction. Waltham, MA: Chandos Publishing.
* Smiraglia, R. P. (Ed.) (2002). Works as entities for information retrieval.
New York: Haworth Information Press. [Co-published simultaneously as Cataloging
& classification quarterly, v. 33, nos. 3/4]
* Smiraglia, R. P., & Lee, H.-L. (Eds.) (2012). Cultural frames of knowledge.
Wurzburg: Ergon-Verlag.
* Smiraglia, R. P., & Lee, H.-L. (Eds.) (2015). Ontology for knowledge
organization. Wurzburg: Ergon-Verlag.
* Smiraglia, R. P., Riva, P., & Z?umer, M. (Eds.) (2013). The FRBR family of
conceptual models: Toward a linked bibliographic future. London: Routledge.
[Co-published simultaneously as Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, vol. 50,
issue 5-7]
* Smith, G. (2008). Tagging: People-powered metadata for the social web.
Berkeley, CA: New Riders. [簡體字中譯本：《標籤系統:為社會化網路注入源於用戶的元數
據》]
* Spiteri, L. F. (Ed.) (2016). Managing metadata in web-scale discovery
systems. London: Facet Publishing.
* Stock, W. G., & Stock, M. (2015). Handbook of information science. Berlin: De
Gruyter.
* Stuary, D. (2016). Practical ontologies for information professionals.
London: Facet Publishing.
* Svenonius, E. (Ed.) (1989). The conceptual foundations of descriptive
cataloging. San Diego: Academic Press.
* Svenonius, E. (2000). The intellectual foundation of information
organization. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2000.
* Sylva, L. (Ed.) (2014). Cataloging and classification: trends,
transformations, teaching, and training. Uxbridge: Koros.
* Szostak, R., Gnoli, C., & Lopez-Huertas, M. (2016). Interdisciplinary
knowledge organization. Cham: Springer International Publishing. [本校訂有電子
版]
* Taylor, A. G., ed. (2007). Understanding FRBR: What it is and how it will
affect our retrieval tools. Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited.
* W3C (2014). RDF 1.1 primer. Retrieved from https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-
primer/
* Williamson, N. J., & Beghtol, C. (Eds.) (2003). Knowledge organization and
classification in international information retrieval. Binghamton, N.Y.:
Haworth Information Press. [Co-published simultaneously as Cataloging &
Classification Quarterly, volume 37, numbers 1/2]
* Williamson, N. J., & Hudon, M. (1992). Classification research for knowledge
representation and organization. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
* Wilson, P. (1968). Two kinds of power: An essay on bibliographical control.
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
* Wood, D., Zaidman, M., & Ruth, L. (2014). Linked data: Structured data on
the Web. Shelter Island: Manning.
* Zhang, Y., & Salaba, A. (2009). Implementing FRBR in libraries: Key issues
and future directions. New York: Neal-Schuman Publishers.
* Zeng, M. L., & Qin, J. (2016). Metadata (2nd ed.). London : Facet Publishing.
[Companion Website: http://metadataetc.org/book-website2nd/]
* ?umer, M., Zeng, M. L., & Salaba, A. (2012). FRSAD: Conceptual modeling of
aboutness. Santa Barbara, Calif.: Libraries Unlimited.
Useful Web Sites
* ISKO Knowledge Organization Literature http://www.isko.org/lit.html
* ISKO Encyclopedia for Knowledge Organization http://www.isko.org/cyclo/
* Knowledge Organization 電子版：https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/zeitschrift/0943-
7444
* Proceedings from North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization (NASKO)
https://journals.lib.washington.edu/index.php/nasko/index
* Cataloging and Metadata Commons http://network.bepress.com/social-and-
behavioral-sciences/library-and-information-science/cataloging-and-metadata/
* Concepts in Library & Information Science and Knowledge Organization compiled
by Birger Hjorland
https://web.archive.org/web/20090620061036/http://www.db.dk:80/bh/Core%20Concep
ts%20in%20LIS/home.htm
* The Epistemological Lifeboat: Epistemology and Philosophy of Science for
Information Scientists compiled by Birger Hjorland and Jeppe Nicolaisen.
https://web.archive.org/web/20070609222514/http://www.db.dk/jni/lifeboat/
* Lifeboat for Knowledge Organization compiled by Birger Hjorland
https://web.archive.org/web/20090104084110/http://www.db.dk:80/bh/Lifeboat_KO/h
ome.htm |
|
評量方式
(僅供參考) |
|
No. |
項目 |
百分比 |
說明 |
|
1. |
課堂報告 |
10% |
每週有三篇指定文獻，分別由三位同學負責導讀及引導討論(請準備問題，至少邀請兩位同學進行討論)。 |
2. |
課堂參與 |
10% |
本課程為研討性質，請踴躍提問及分享看法。 |
3. |
讀書心得（一） |
15% |
各篇請先寫一頁摘要，再撰寫3-4頁心得。字體請選12號字，行距採1.5行間距。
三篇擇一 [繳交日期：4/12]
* Coyle, K. (2016). FRBR before and after: A look at our bibliographic models. Chicago: ALA. http://kcoyle.net/beforeAndAfter/
* PCC SCS/LDAC Task Group on the Work Entity (2017). Preliminary white paper. https://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/documents/PoCo-2017/WorkEntitity%20Preliminary%20White%20Paper-2017-09-27.pdf
* Smiraglia, R. P. (2014). The elements of knowledge organization. Cham: Springer International Publishing. |
4. |
讀書心得（二） |
15% |
各篇請先寫一頁摘要，再撰寫3-4頁心得。字體請選12號字，行距採1.5行間距。
三篇擇一 [繳交日期：5/17]
* ARL Task Force on Wikimedia and Linked Open Data (2019). ARL white paper on Wikidata: Opportunities and recommendations. https://www.arl.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/2019.04.18-ARL-white-paper-on-Wikidata.pdf
* Bahnemann, G., et al. (2021). Transforming metadata into linked data to improve digital collection discoverability: A CONTENTdm pilot project. Dublin, OH: OCLC Research. https://doi.org/10.25333/fzcv-0851.
* Smith-Yoshimura, K. (2020). Transitioning to the next generation of metadata. Dublin, OH: OCLC Research. https://doi.org/10.25333/rqgd-b343 |
5. |
Literature review term paper |
50% |
* 請參考Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST)，以此作為撰寫文獻回顧的範例。另可參見ISKO Knowledge Organization Literature (https://www.isko.org/lit.html)，選擇class中02 Literature Review in KO (https://www.isko.org/kolit.php?cl=02&au=&ti=&da=&la=)
* 原則上，收錄範圍建議自2000年後迄今。但若所選題材較新，則從其出現的年份開始。作業所分析的文獻量，至少需在二十篇以上。
* 請於4月19日繳交一頁note，說明你的題目、研究重點與範圍、資料蒐集方法等。原則上，希望同學的題目不重複；若有重複，我們另行協調處理。
* 學期最後幾週安排課堂報告，由每位同學分享文獻回顧的發現與心得。
* 文字報告的格式，字體請選12號字，行距採1.5行間距。
* 請遵守學術規範的要求，並依APA或Chicago Style（二者擇一）提供引文註釋與參考書目，請注意操作上之一致性與正確性。若作業經確認為抄襲者，作業不予計分。 |
|
|
週次 |
日期 |
單元主題 |
|
第1週 |
2/15 |
Introduction / Bibliographic Control in General / Trends
藍文欽(2021) 資訊組織研究文獻回顧（2010-2020）。在吳美美編，圖書資訊學研究回顧與前瞻2.0，第一章。
基本概念回顧，任意瀏覽至少下列文獻之一：
* Chan, L. M., & Salaba, A. (2016). Cataloging and classification: An introduction (4th ed.). Lanham, MD.: Rowman & Littlefield. Chapter 1.
* Joudrey, D. N., & Taylor, A. G. (2018). The organization of information (4th ed.). Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited. Chapter 1.
* Joudrey, D. N., Taylor, A. G., & Miller, D. P. (2015). Introduction to cataloging and classification (11th ed.). Santa Barbara: Libraries Unlimited. Chapter 1.
* Rubin, R. E. (2016). Foundations of library and information science (4th ed.). Chicago: Neal-Schuman. Chapter 6.
* Rosenfeld, L., Morville, P., & Arango, J. (2015). Information architecture: For the Web and beyond (4th ed.). Beijing: O’Reilly. Chapter 2 & 5. |
|
第2週 |
2/22 |
Knowledge Organization (KO), Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS)
導讀同學：黃郁雯、唐宗忻、邱筱曼
* Glushko, R. J. (Ed.) (2013). The discipline of organizing (4th Core Concept ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Chapter 1, Foundations for Organizing Systems. [1.10 Organizing this book 可略過] https://ischools.org/resources/Documents/Discipline%20of%20organizing/Core%20Concepts/TDO4-Core-CC-Chapter1.pdf
* Andersen, J., & Skouvig, L. (2006). Knowledge organization: A sociohistorical analysis and critique. The Library Quarterly, 76(3), 300-322.
* Mazzocchi, F. (2018). Knowledge organization system. Knowledge Organization, 45(1), 54-78. Also available in ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization, http://www.isko.org/cyclo/kos
[延伸閱讀]
* Hider, P. (2018). The terminological and disciplinary origins of information and knowledge organization. Education for Information, 34(1), 135-61.
* Hjørland, B. (2016). Knowledge organization. Knowledge Organization, 43(6), 475-84. Also available in ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization, http://www.isko.org/cyclo/knowledge_organization
* Mai, J-E. (1999). A postmodern theory of knowledge organization. Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting, 36, 547-556. http://jenserikmai.info/Papers/1999_APostmodernTheoryOfKnowledgeOrganization.pdf |
|
第3週 |
3/01 |
Fundamental Issues
導讀同學：朱彥蓉、陳彥竹、劉康平
* Shera, J. H. (1965). Foundations of a theory of bibliography. In J. H. Shera, Libraries and the organization of knowledge (pp. 18-33). London: Crosby Lockwood & Son.
* Smiraglia, R. P. (2014). The elements of knowledge organization. Cham: Springer International Publishing. “About Theory of Knowledge Organization” & “Philosophy: Underpinnings of Knowledge Organization” (pp. 7-32). [本校有電子版]
* Wilson, P. (1968). Two kinds of power: An essay on bibliographical control. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Chapter 2. [可參考下列文章中作者對Wilson觀點的解讀：White, H. D. (2019). Patrick Wilson. Knowledge Organization, 46(4), 279-307. Also available in ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization, http://www.isko.org/cyclo/wilson]
[延伸閱讀]
* Hjørland, B. (2013). Theories of knowledge organization: Theories of knowledge. Knowledge Organization, 40(3), 169-181.
* Smiraglia, R. P. (2002). The progress of theory in knowledge organization. Library Trends, 50 (3), 330–349. |
|
第4週 |
3/08 |
Resources / Bibliographic Entities / Work
導讀同學：蔡湯慧、崔雅萱、曾玉淳
* Glushko, R. J. (Ed.) (2013). The discipline of organizing (4th Core Concept ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Chapter 4, Resources in Organizing Systems. https://ischools.org/resources/Documents/Discipline%20of%20organizing/Core%20Concepts/TDO4-Core-CC-Chapter4.pdf
* Svenonius, E. (2000). The intellectual foundation of information organization. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Chapter 3, Bibliographic Entities.
* Holden, C. (2020). The bibliographic work: History, theory, and practice. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 59(2/3), 77-96.
[延伸閱讀]
關於work較詳細的討論，請參考專書：Smiraglia, R. P. (2001). The nature of a work: Implications for the organization of knowledge. Lanham, Md.: Scarecrow Press.
* Coyle, K. (2016). FRBR before and after: A look at our bibliographic models. Chap. 1, The Work (pp. 3-28). [The author provides an e-book which is available from http://kcoyle.net/beforeAndAfter/978-0-8389-1364-2.pdf]
* Smiraglia, R. P. (2019). Work. Knowledge Organization, 46(4), 308-319. Also available in ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization, http://www.isko.org/cyclo/work
* Wilson, P. (1968). The bibliographic universe. In Two kinds of power: An essay on bibliographic control (pp.6-19). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
* Yee, M. M.所撰 “What is a work?” Part 1-Part 4 系列文章(分期刊載於Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, v.19-v.20) |
|
第5週 |
3/15 |
FRBR / IFLA LRM
導讀同學：廖宏恩、劉沁琳、熊梓婷
基本背景：
*IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (1998). Functional requirements for bibliographic records: Final report. [FRBR] Munchen: K.G. Saur. The 2009 amended version is available from: http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frbr/frbr_2008.pdf [主要是第三章]
本週指定閱讀
* Taylor, A. G. (2007). An introduction to Functional Requirement for Bibliographic Records (FRBR). In A. G. Taylor (Ed), Understanding FRBR: What it is and how it will affect our retrieval tools (pp. 1-19). Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited.
* Pisanski, J., & Žumer, M. (2012). User verification of the FRBR conceptual model. Journal of Documentation, 68(4), 582-592.
* Žumer, M. (2018). IFLA Library Reference Model (IFLA LRM): Harmonisation of the FRBR family. Knowledge Organization, 45(4), 310-318. Also available from ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization, http://http://www.isko.org/cyclo/lrm
[Note: 第2、3篇由同一位同學導讀]
* Budanović, M. P., & Žumer, M. (2021). Prototype cataloging interface based on the IFLA Library Reference Model (LRM). Part 1: Conceptual design. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 59(7), 619-643.
[延伸閱讀]
* Arastoopoor, S. (2020). Users' perception of navigating bibliographic families from IFLA-LRM perspective. Library Hi Tech, https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-12-2019-0240
* Budanović, M. P., & Žumer, M. (2021). Prototype cataloging interface based on the IFLA Library Reference Model (LRM). Part 2: Usability evaluation. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 59(7), 644-668.
* Dickey, T. J. (2008). FRBRization of a library catalog: Better collocation of records, leading to enhanced search, retrieval, and display. Information Technology & Libraries, 27(1), 23-32.
* Hider, P. (2017). A critique of the FRBR user tasks and their modifications. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 55(2), 55-74.
* Pisanski, J., & Žumer, M. (2010b). Mental models of the bibliographic universe. Part 1, Mental models of descriptions. Journal of Documentation, 66(5), 643–668.
* Pisanski, J., & Žumer, M. (2010c). Mental models of the bibliographic universe. Part 2, Comparison tasks and conclusions. Journal of Documentation, 66(5), 668–680.
* Rašmane, A., & Goldberga, A. (2020). The potential of IFLA LRM and RDA key entities for identification of entities in textual documents of cultural heritage: The RunA collection. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 58(8), 705-727. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2020.1862380
* Zhang, Y., & Salaba, A. (2009). Implementing FRBR in libraries: Key issues and future directions. New York: Neal-Schuman Publishers. Chapter 5. |
|
第6週 |
3/22 |
RDF / Linked Data
導讀同學：龔俐霏、陳沛萱、葉 昀
基本背景：
* Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., & Lassila, O. (2001, May 17). The semantic web. Scientific American. Retrieved from http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=thesemantic-web.
* Berners-Lee, T. (2006). Linked data. Retrieved from https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html
* Briles, M. (2016). Linked data 101: Getting caught in the semantic web. Retrieved from SlideShare https://www.slideshare.net/MorganBriles/linked-data-101-getting-caught-in-the-semantic-web
這份簡報，只有短短十幾頁，但有關 linked data 的基本概念均已清楚地含括其中 （四項原則、URI與vocabulary standard、serialization等）
* W3C (2014). RDF 1.1 primer. Retrieved from https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-primer/ [參見：https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resource_Description_Framework
本週指定閱讀：
* Practical Resource Description Framework (RDF) – Chap 1, RDF: An Introduction (http://etutorials.org/Misc/Practical+resource+description+framework+rdf/Chapter+1.+RDF+An+Introduction/) & Chap. 2, RDF: Heart and Soul (http://etutorials.org/Misc/Practical+resource+description+framework+rdf/Chapter+2.+RDF+Heart+and+Soul/)
* Ullah, I., Khusro, S., Ullah, A., & Naeem, M. (2018). An Overview of the Current State of Linked and Open Data in Cataloging. Information Technology and Libraries, 37(4), 47-80. https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v37i4.10432
* Lampert, C. K., & Southwick, S. B. (2013). Leading to Linking: Introducing linked data to academic library digital collections, Journal of Library Metadata, 13(2/3), 230-253. DOI: 10.1080/19386389.2013.826095 [參見吳美美編，圖書資訊學研究回顧與前瞻2.0，第二章，從知識本體及鏈結資料角度探討數位人文學的資訊組織與檢索∕陳淑君。]
[Examples & Useful Sites]
* Library of Congress. Linked Data Services: Authorities and Vocabularies http://id.loc.gov/
* Getty Vocabularies as Linked Open Data http://www.getty.edu/research/tools/vocabularies/lod/
* OCLC Linked Data https://www.oclc.org/developer/develop/linked-data.en.html
* VIAF Linked Data http://viaf.org/viaf/data/
* EUCLID Linked Data Training Modules -- http://euclid-project.eu/index.html
* Free Your Metadata: Learn how to get more value out of metadata easily. http://freeyourmetadata.org/ [由Linked Data for Libraries, Archives, and Museums一書的作者現身說法，提供詳細步驟與資料，帶領學習者逐步掌握如何做]
[延伸閱讀]
* 方凱鴻（2016）。以鏈結資料建置圖書館目錄查詢系統之研究。未出版碩士論文，臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所。
* 陳亞寧（2020）。書目資訊鏈結資料化方法之研究：書目本體論、鏈結型機讀編目與Schema.org。教育資料與圖書館學，57(3)，379-412。 https://doi.org/10.6120/JoEMLS.202011_57(3).0017.OR.AM
* Alemu, G., Stevens, B., Ross, P., & Chandler, J. (2012). Linked data for libraries: Benefits of a conceptual shift from library-specific record structures to RDF-based data models. New Library World, 113(11-12), 549-570.
* Bauer, F. & Kaltenböck, M. (2012). Linked open data: The essentials. Vienna: Edition mono/monochrom.
* Bermes, E. (2013). Enabling your catalogue for the Semantic Web. In S. Chambers (Ed.), Catalogue 2.0: The future of the library catalogue (pp. 117-142). London: Facet
* Cervone, F. & Svensson, L. G. (Eds.) (2015). Linked data and user interaction: The road ahead. Berlin: De Gruyter Saur.
* DeWeese, K. P. & Segal, D. (2015). Libraries and the semantic Web. San Rafael: Morgan & Claypool. [本校訂有電子版]
* Gandon, F., Krummenacher, R., Han, S.-K., & Toma, I. (2011). The Resource Description Framework and its Schema. In Handbook of Semantic Web Technologies, retrieved from https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01171045/document
* Gonzales, B. M. (2014). Linking libraries to the Web: Linked data and the future of the bibliographic record. Information Technology & Libraries, 33(4), 10-22.
* Heath, T., & Bizer, C. (2011). Linked data: Evolving the Web into a global data space. San Francisco: Morgan & Claypool. Chap. 1 & 2. [HTML version: http://linkeddatabook.com/editions/1.0/]
* Hooland, S. V. & Verborgh, R. (2014). Linked data for libraries, archives and museums: How to clean, link and publish your metadata. London: Facet Publishing.
* Mitchell, E. T. (2013a). Building blocks of linked open data in libraries. Library Technology Reports, 49(5), 11-25.
* Mitchell, E. T. (2013b). Library linked data: Research and adoption. Library Technology Reports, 50(5), 1-50.
* Mitchell, E. T. (2016). Library linked data: Early activity and development. Library Technology Reports, 52(1), 5-33.
* Park, H., & Kipp, M. (2019) Library linked data models: Library data in the Semantic Web. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 57 (5), 261-277.
* Powell, J., & Hopkins, M. (2015). A librarian’s guide to graphs, data and the semantic web. Waltham, MA: Chandos. Chapter 4, RDF and its serialization.
* Williams, J. (2021). From silo to the Web: Library cataloging data in an open environment. In S. S. Hines (Ed.), Technical services in the 21st century (p. 175-191). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing. (Advances in Library Administration and Organization, 42, 175-191.)
* Yoose, B., & Perkins, J. (2013). The linked open data landscape in libraries and beyond. Journal of Library Metadata, 13(2-3), 197-211. |
|
第7週 |
3/29 |
Resources Description / Cataloging Rules
導讀同學：陳沐迦、盧歆倍、許淑莉
* Glushko, R. J. (Ed.). (2016). The discipline of organizing (4th Core Concepts ed.). Cambridge, MA: O’Reilly Media. Chapter V, Resources Description and Metadata, retrieved from https://ischools.org/resources/Documents/Discipline%20of%20organizing/Core%20Concepts/TDO4-Core-CC-Chapter5.pdf
* Dobreski, B. (2020). Descriptive cataloging: The history and practice of describing library resources. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 59(2/3), 225-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2020.1864693
* Hider, P. & Liu, Y.-H. (2013). The use of RDA elements in support of FRBR user tasks. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 51 (8), 857-872.
[延伸閱讀]
* Bernstein, S. (2014). Beyond content, media, and carrier: RDA carrier characteristics. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 52(5), 463-486.
* Biswas, S. (2015). Reflections of Ranganathan's normative principles of cataloging in RDA. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 53(8), 948-963.
* Hider, P. (2009). A comparison between the RDA taxonomies and end-user categorizations of content and carrier. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 47 (6), 544-560.
* McCallum, C., Gilbertson, K., Kelley, S., & Corbett, L. E. (2017). Can RDA content, media, and carrier coding improve discovery facet mapping? Library Resources & Technical Services, 61(2), 93-101.
* Riva, P., & Oliver, C. (2012). Evaluation of RDA as an implementation of FRBR and FRAD. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 50 (5-7), 564-586.
* Taniguchi, S. (2015). Modeling resource description tasks in RDA. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 53(1), 88-111. |
|
第8週 |
4/05 |
清明節放假 |
|
第9週 |
4/12 |
Next-Generation Catalogs / Discovery Services / Catalog Quality
[繳交第一份讀書心得報告]
導讀同學：林文君、黃諄雅、游雯涵
* Wells, D. (2020). Online public access catalogues and library discovery systems. In ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization, https://www.isko.org/cyclo/opac
* Breeding, M. (2014). Discovery product functionality. Library Technology Reports, 50(1), 5-32.
[Note: 另一值得留意的發展是open source discovery service tools, e.g., https://devopscube.com/open-source-service-discovery/ ; https://stackshare.io/service-discovery ]
* Petrucciani, A. (2015). Quality of library catalogs and value of (good) catalogs. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 53 (3/4), 303-313.
[延伸閱讀]
* Barton, J., & Mak, L. (2012). Old hopes, new possibilities: Next-generation catalogues and the centralization of access. Library Trends, 61(1), 83-106.
* Breeding, M. (2015). The future of library resource discovery: A white paper commissioned by the NISO Discovery to Delivery (D2D) Topic Committee. Baltimore: NISO. https://groups.niso.org/apps/group_public/download.php/14487/future_library_resource_discovery.pdf
* Wynne, S. C., & Hanscom, M. J. (2011). The effect of next-generation catalogs on catalogers and cataloging functions in academic libraries. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 49(3), 179-207, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2011.559899
[Metadata Quality]
* Mugridge, R. L. (Ed.) (2019). Assessment of cataloging and metadata services. London: Routledge.
* Park, J., Tosaka, Y., Maszaros, S., & Lu, C. (2010). From metadata creation to metadata quality control: Continuing education needs among cataloging and metadata professionals. Journal of Education for Library & Information Science, 51(3), 158-176.
* Petrucciani, A. (2015). Quality of library catalogs and value of (good) catalogs. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 53 (3/4), 303-313.
* Snow, K. (2017). Defining, assessing, and rethinking quality cataloging. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 55 (7/8), 438-455.
* Schultz-Jones, B., Snow, K., Miksa, S., & Hasenyager Jr., R. L. (2012). Historical and current implications of cataloguing quality for next-generation catalogues. Library Trends, 61(1), 49-82.
* Talleras, K. (2017). Quality of linked bibliographic data: The models, vocabularies, and links of data sets published by four national libraries. Journal of Library Metadata, 17(2), 126-155. |
|
第10週 |
4/19 |
Bibliographic Relationships / Catalog Use
[繳交期末報告題目概述]
導讀同學：辛宜、黃郁雯、唐宗忻
* Tillett, B. B. (2001). Bibliographic relationships. In C. A. Bean, & R. Green (Eds), Relationships in the organization of knowledge (pp. 19-35). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
* Moreira, W., & Martínez-Ávila, D. (2018). Concept relationships in knowledge organization systems: Elements for analysis and common research among fields. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 56(1), 19-39, https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2017.1357157
* Markey, K. (2007) Twenty-five years of end-user searching, Part 1: research findings. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58 (8), 1071-1081. Part 2: Future research directions. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58 (8), 1123-1130.
[延伸閱讀]
* Green, R. (2001). Relationships in the organization of knowledge: An overview. In C. A. Bean, & R. Green (Eds), Relationships in the organization of knowledge (pp. 3-18). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
* Niu, J. (2013). Hierarchical relationships in the bibliographic universe. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 51(5), 473-490.
Park, T. K., & Morrison, A. M. (2017). The nature and characteristics of bibliographic relationships in RDA cataloging records in OCLC at the beginning of RDA implementation. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 55 (6), 361-386.
* Picco, P., & Ortiz Repiso, V. (2012). The contribution of FRBR to the identification of bibliographic relationships: The new RDA-based ways of representing relationships in catalogs. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 50(5-7), 622-640.
* Smiraglia, R. P., & Leazer, G. H. (1999). Derivative bibliographic relationships: The work relationship in a global bibliographic database. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(6), 493-504.
* Szostak, R. (2012). Classifying relationships. Knowledge Organization, 39(3), 165-178.
* Tillett, B. B. (1991). A taxonomy of bibliographic relationships. Library Resources & Technical Services, 35, 150-158.
* Wallheim, H. (2016). From complex reality to formal description: Bibliographic relationships and problems of operationalization in RDA. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 54(7), 483-503.
[Catalog Use ]
* Borgman, C. L. (1996). Why are online catalogs still hard to use?" Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(7): 493-503.
* Markey, K. (2007). The online library catalog: Paradise lost and paradise regained? D-Lib Magazine, 13(1/2). Retrieved from: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january07/markey/01markey.html
* Miksa, F. (2009). Information organization and the mysterious information user. Libraries & the Cultural Record, 44(3), 343–372.
* Novotny, E. (2004). I don't think I click: A protocol analysis study of use of a library online catalog in the Internet age. College & Research Libraries, 65(6), 525-537.
* Waller, V. (2010). Accessing the collection of a large public library: An analysis of OPAC use. LIBRES: Library & Information Science Research Electronic Journal, 20(1), 1-27.
* Wilson, R., & Given, L. M. (2010). The effect of spelling and retrieval system familiarity on search behavior in online public access catalogs: A mixed methods study. Journal Of The American Society For Information Science & Technology, 61(12), 2461-2476.
* Wilson, V. (2015). Catalog users “in the wild”: The potential of an ethnographic approach to studies of library catalogs and their users. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 53(2), 190-213. |
|
第11週 |
4/26 |
Subject Analysis – Classification / Organization Systems
導讀同學：邱筱曼、朱彥蓉、陳彥竹
* Hjørland, B. (2017). Classification. Knowledge Organization, 44(2), 97-128. Also available in ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization, http://www.isko.org/cyclo/classification [有關各家對分類的定義，瀏覽即可]
* Kwasnik, B. (1999). The role of classification in knowledge representation and discovery. Library Trends, 48(1), 22-47.
* Rosenfeld, L., Morville, P., & Arango, J. (2015). Information architecture for the Web and beyond. Beijing: O’Reilly. Chapter 6, Organization Systems (pp. 97-131).
[延伸閱讀]
* Beghtol, C. 1. (1986). Bibliographic classification theory and text linguistics: Aboutness analysis, intertextuality and the cognitive act of classifying documents. Journal of Documentation, 42, 84-113.
* Clarke, R. I. (2021). Library classification systems in the U.S.: Basic ideas and examples. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2021.1881008
* Frické, M. (2013). Reflections on classification: Thomas Reid and bibliographic description. Journal of Documentation, 69(4), 507-522.
* Olson, H. A. (2009). Social influences on classification. In Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences (3rd ed.). New York: Taylor and Francis. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1081/E-ELIS3-120044536
* Shera, J. H. (1965). Classification as the basis of bibliographic organization. In Libraries and the organization of knowledge (pp. 77-96). London: Crosby Lockwook & Son.
* Smiraglia, R. P., & den Heuvel, C. V. (2013). Classifications and concepts: Towards an elementary theory of knowledge interaction. Journal of Documentation, 69(3), 360-383.
* Svenonius, E. (1992). Classification: Prospects, problems and possibilities. In N. J. Williamson, & M. Hudon (Eds.), Classification research for knowledge representation and organization (pp. 5-25). Amsterdam: Elsevier. |
|
第12週 |
5/03 |
Key Concepts in Classification
導讀同學：劉康平、蔡湯慧、崔雅萱
* Hudon, M. (2019). Facet. ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization, https://www.isko.org/cyclo/facet
* Barité, M. (2018). Literary warrant. Knowledge Organization, 45(6), 517-536. Also available in ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization, http://www.isko.org/cyclo/literary_warrant
* Hjørland, B. (2002). Domain analysis in information science. Eleven approaches — traditional as well as innovative. Journal of Documentation, 58 (4), 422-462.
[延伸閱讀]
* Bergman, M. K. (2021). Hierarchy. In ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization, https://www.isko.org/cyclo/hierarchy
* Gnoli, C. (2018). Notation. Knowledge Organization, 45(8), 667-684. Also available in ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization, http://www.isko.org/cyclo/notation
* Hjørland, B. (2013). Facet analysis: The logical approach to knowledge organization. Information Processing and Management, 49(2), 545–57. Also available online from IEKO: https://www.isko.org/cyclo/facet_analysis
* Hjørland, B. (2016). Domain analysis. Knowledge Organization 44, no. 6: 436-464. Also available from: http://www.isko.org/cyclo/domain_analysis
* La Barre, K. (2010). Facet analysis. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 44, 243-284.
* López-Huertas, M. J. (2015). Domain analysis for interdisciplinary knowledge domains. Knowledge Organization, 42 (8), 570-580.
* Mills, J. (2004). Faceted classification and logical division in information retrieval. Library Trends, 52(3): 541-70.
* Smiraglia, R. P. (2015). Domain analysis as a methodological paradigm in knowledge organization. In Domain analysis for knowledge organization: Tools for ontology extraction (pp.19-39). Waltham, MA: Chandos Publishing. |
|
第13週 |
5/10 |
Subject Analysis – Verbal / Indexing / Aboutness
導讀同學：曾玉淳、廖宏恩、劉沁琳
* Smith, C. (2021). Controlled vocabularies: Past, present and future of subject access. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 59(2/3), 186-202.
* Hjørland, B. (2018). Indexing: Concepts and theory. Knowledge Organization, 45(7), 609-39. Also available in ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization, http://www.isko.org/cyclo/indexing
* Holley, R. M., & Joudrey, D. N. (2020). Aboutness and conceptual analysis: A review. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, DOI: 10.1080/01639374.2020.1856992
[延伸閱讀]
* Gross, T., Taylor, A. G., & Joudrey, D. N. (2015). Still a lot to lose: The role of controlled vocabulary in keyword searching. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 53(1), 1-39.
* Furner, J. (2012). FRSAD and the ontology of subjects of works. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 50(5-7), 494-516. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2012.681269
* Harper, C. A. & Tillett, B. B. (2007). Library of Congress controlled vocabularies and their application to the Semantic Web. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 43 (3/4), 47-68.
* Hjørland, B. (2001). Towards a theory of aboutness, subject, topicality, theme, domain, field, content ... and relevance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(9), 774-778.
* Martínez-Ávila, D. & Budd, J. M. (2017). Epistemic warrant for categorizational activities and the development of controlled vocabularies. Journal of Documentation, 73 (4), 700-715.
* Rondeau, S. (2014). The life and times of aboutness: A review of the library and information science literature. Evidence Based Library & Information Practice, 9(1). Retrieved from https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/eblip/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/19091/16224
* Svenonius, E. (2000). The intellectual foundation of information organization. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Chapter 8, Subject Language: Introduction, Vocabulary Selection, and Classification. |
|
第14週 |
5/17 |
Folksonomies / Social Tagging / Cataloging Ethics
[繳交第二份讀書心得報告]
導讀同學：熊梓婷、龔俐霏、陳沛萱
瀏覽：
* 吳筱玫（2009）。俗民分類與知識型：Tag的資訊秩序,。中華傳播學刊, 15, 頁3-31。 Available from http://cjc.nccu.edu.tw/word/283312142013.pdf
* 吳筱玫、周芷伊（2009）。Taggging的分類與知識意涵：以flickr首頁圖片為例。新聞學研究，No.99，頁265-305。Available from http://mcr.nccu.edu.tw/word/1234302013.pdf
本週指定閱讀
* Rafferty, P. (2018). Tagging. Knowledge Organization, 45 (6), 500-516. Also available in ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization, http://www.isko.org/cyclo/tagging
* Gerolimos, M. (2013). Tagging for libraries: A review of the effectiveness of tagging systems for library catalogs. Journal of Library Metadata, 13 (1), 36-58.
* Martin, J. M. (2021). Records, responsibility, and power: An overview of cataloging ethics. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 59(2/3), 281-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2020.1871458
[延伸閱讀]
* Bullard, J. (2018). Curated folksonomies: Three implementations of structure through human judgment. Knowledge Organization, 45(8), 643-652.
* Kipp, M. I., & Campbell, D. G. (2010). Searching with tags: Do tags help users find things? Knowledge Organization, 37(4), 239-255.
* Munk, T. B., & Mørk, K. (2007). Folksonomy, The power law & the significance of the least effort. Knowledge Organization, 34(1), 16-33.
* Spiteri, L. F. (2010). Incorporating facets into social tagging applications: An analysis of current trends. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 48(1), 94-109.
* Trant, J. (2009). Studying social tagging and folksonomy: A review and framework. Journal of Digital Information, 10(1). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10150/105375
* Windleharth, T. W., Jett, J., Schmalz, M., & Lee, J. H. (2016). Full steam ahead: A conceptual analysis of user-supplied tags on steam. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 54(7), 418-441.
[Cataloging Ethics]
* Cataloguing Code of Ethics https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IBz7nXQPfr3U1P6Xiar9cLAkzoNX_P9fq7eHvzfSlZ0/edit
* Ridi, R. (2013). Ethical values for knowledge organization. Knowledge Organization, 40(3), 187-196.
* Sandberg, J. (Ed.) (2019). Ethical questions in name authority control. Sacramento, CA: Library Juice Press.
* Smiraglia, R. P. (2009). Bibliocentrism, cultural warrant, and the ethics of resource description: A case study. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 47(7), 671-686.
* Snow, K. (2015). An examination of the practical and ethical issues surrounding false memoirs in cataloging practice. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 53(8), 927-947.
* Snow, K., & Shoemaker, B. (2020). Defining cataloging ethics: Practitioner perspectives. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 58(6), 533-546. https://doi.org/1.1080/01639374.2020.1795767
|
|
第15週 |
5/24 |
BIBFRAME / Interoperability / Authority Control
導讀同學：葉昀、陳沐迦、盧歆倍
參考：
* 陳亞寧、溫達茂（2020）。MARC 21鍊結資料化的轉變與應用。教育資料與圖書館學，57(1), 35-72。
* A brief introduction to BIBFRAME 2.0 by Kelley McGrath http://nwcentral.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/McGrath_Bibframe_OLA_2017.pdf
本週指定閱讀
* Kim, M., Chen, M., Montgomery, D. (2021). Moving toward BIBFRAME and a linked data environment. In S. S. Hines (Ed.), Technical services in the 21st century (p. 131-154). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing. (Advances in Library Administration and Organization, 42, 131-154.)
* Zeng, M. L. (2019). Interoperability. Knowledge Organization, 46(2), 122-146. Also available in ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization, http://www.isko.org/cyclo/interoperability
* Wiederhold, R. A., & Reeve, G. F. (2021). Authority control today: Principles, practices, and trends. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 59(2/3), 129-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2021.1881009
[延伸閱讀]
* BIBFRAME Training at the Library of Congress https://www.loc.gov/catworkshop/bibframe/
* BIBFRAME （Bibliographic Framework） from Librarianship Studies and Information Technology https://www.librarianshipstudies.com/2017/12/bibframe.html
* Cole, T. W., Han, M.-J., Weathers, W. F., & Joyner, E. (2013). Library MARC records into linked open data: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Library Metadata, 13(2/3), 163-196.
* Kroeger, A. (2013). The road to BIBFRAME: The evolution of the idea of bibliographic transition into a post-MARC future. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 51(8), 873-890.
* Library of Congress. Policy, Training, and Cooperative Programs Division. (2019). Library of Congress BIBFRAME manual. Washington, DC: Library of Congress. Retrieved from https://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/bibframe/BIBFRAME-Manual-Final-2019-07-12.pdf
* McCallum, S. (2017). BIBFRAME development. JLIS.it, 8(3), 71–85. Available from https://www.jlis.it/article/view/12415/11282
* Park, J.-R., Richards, L. L., & Brenza, A.(2019). Benefits and challenges of BIBFRAME. Library Hi Tech, 37 (3), 549-565.
* Sanderson, R. (2015). Analysis of the BIBFRAME ontology for linked data best practices, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dIy-FgQsH67Ay0T0O0ulhyRiKjpf_I0AVQ9v8FLmPNo/edit#heading=h.310o1a8282cm
* Schreur, P. (2018). The evolution of BIBFRAME: From MARC surrogate to Web conformant data model. Paper presented at: IFLA WLIC 2018 – Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Retrieved from http://library.ifla.org/2202/1/141-schreur-en.pdf
* Taniguchi, S. (2018). Mapping and merging of IFLA Library Reference Model and BIBFRAME 2.0. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 56(5/6), 427-454.
* Woolcott, L., Payant, A., Skeen, B., & Daybell, P. (2021). Missing the MARC: Utilization of MARC fields in the search process. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2021.1881010
* Xu, A., Hess, K., & Akerman, L. (2018). From MARC to BIBFRAME 2.0: Crosswalks. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 56(2/3), 224-250.
[Authority Control / Identity Management]
* Armitage, A., Cuneo, M. J., Quintana, I., & Carlson Young, K. (2020). ISNI and traditional authority work. JLIS.it, 11(1), 151–163. Retrieved from https://www.jlis.it/article/view/12554/11378
* Cannan, J. P., Frank, P., & Hawkins, L. (2019). LC/NACO authority file in the Library of Congress BIBFRAME Pilots. Journal of Library Metadata, 19 (1/2), 39-51.
* Downey, M. (2019). Assessing author identifiers: Preparing for a linked data approach to name authority control in an institutional repository context. Journal of Library Metadata, 19 (1/2), 117-136.
* Heng, G., Cole, T. W., Tian, T., & Han, M.-J. (2021). Rethinking authority reconciliation process. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2021.1992554 * Jin, Q., & Kudeki, D. (2019). Identity and access management for libraries. Technical Services Quarterly, 36 (1), 44-60.
* Powell, J., Hoover, C., Gordon, A., & Mittrach, M. (2019), Bridging identity challenges: Why and how one library plugged ORCiD into their enterprise. Library Hi Tech, 37 (3), 625-639.
* Stalberg, E., et al. (2020). Exploring models for shared identity management at a global scale: The work of the PCC Task Group on Identity Management in NACO. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 58(3/4), 428-437. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2019.1699880
參見：Wikidata Main Page https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Main_Page
* Thompson, K. J. (2016). More than a name: A content analysis of name authority records for authors who self-identify as trans. Library Resources & Technical Services, 60 (3), 140-155.
* Zhu, L. (2019). The future of authority control: Issues and trends in the linked data environment. Journal of Library Metadata, 19(3/4), 215-238. |
|
第16週 |
5/31 |
Class presentation
報告順序：許淑莉 、林文君 、黃諄雅 、游雯涵 、辛 宜 、黃郁雯 、唐宗忻、崔雅萱 |
|
第17週 |
6/07 |
class presentation
報告順序：朱彥蓉 、陳彥竹 、劉康平 、蔡湯慧 、邱筱曼 、曾玉淳 、廖宏恩 |
|
第18週 |
6/14 |
Class presentation
報告順序：劉沁琳、熊梓婷 、龔俐霏 、陳沛萱 、葉 昀 、陳沐迦 、盧歆倍 |
|