課程資訊
課程名稱
資訊搜尋與決策行為
Special Topic on Information Seeking and Decision Making 
開課學期
110-2 
授課對象
文學院  圖書資訊學研究所  
授課教師
唐牧群 
課號
LIS7017 
課程識別碼
126 M0620 
班次
 
學分
3.0 
全/半年
半年 
必/選修
選修 
上課時間
星期三7,8,9(14:20~17:20) 
上課地點
圖資研討三 
備註
總人數上限:8人 
 
課程簡介影片
 
核心能力關聯
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖
課程大綱
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
課程概述

Rarely do we acquire an information good after we experience it in its entirety. Individuals learn about a work from partial information (e.g. reviews, word-of-month, summaries and abstracts etc.), therefore the inevitable uncertainty in predicting the content and relevance of a work.
The nature of uncertainty experienced by users is likely to change in a digital environment. While perusing of the content of a work is circumscribed in an on line environment, novel decision aids such as user reviews and recommender systems are becoming more prevalent to reduce decision uncertainty and promote serendipitously information encounters.
The course is designed to explore various aspects of decision making in information consumption. To provide the students necessary analytic tools for user decision making, a survey of relevant literature in cognitive science, social psychology, HCI, and consumer behaviors will be given, with a special focus on their implications on explaining and predicting information users' decision making.
It is hoped that a better understanding of the process of how users assimilate and combine various information cues in their information environment will provide valuable insights into the design of information services able to reduce search efforts and search uncertainty therefore promote higher user satisfaction. 

課程目標
The class will be organized according to the following modules:
1. Characteristics of information/creative products
2. The mediating role of "information cue"
3. Models in decision making (Heuristics, Bayesian inference, Len's model, bounded rationality)
4. Cognitive economy and information foraging theory
5. Users responses to recommender systems and other consumer decision aids 
課程要求
1. Empirical research review (40%)
Each student will present 3~ 4 empirical studies (See the class schedule for the date for presentation).
This assignment is designed to help familiarize yourself with the actual user study procedures. The review should consist of the following basic elements of an empirical research:
a. Research questions
b. Theoretical framework
c. Hypotheses
d. Methodology
e. Design
f. Findings
g. Critiques: strengths and potential flaws (e.g. threats to external or internal validity)
For this assignment, you can opt to either work indepentantly or in group. If working in group, the number of the articles each group reports will be the sum of the group members.
No written report for this assignment. Prepare a 30 minutes power point presentation and a 10 minutes Q&A session. The power point file is to be posted on the class website one day before the date on which your presentation is scheduled.

2. Term paper (40%)
Each student will write a research proposal that informed by theories or empricial studies introduced in the class, which is due at the end of the semester.
As the forcus of the paper will be the methodology, a lengthy literature review is not requried. It will be a user study that consists of the following components:
a. Identify and present an "examplar paper" you wish to base your study on
b. Theoretical framework and problem statement (1-2 pages)
c. Study objectives (1-2 pages)
d. Research Questions (1-2 pages)
e. Research procedures (methodology, design, instruments) (4-8 pages)
f. Expected difficulties (1-2) pages
g. Presentation of the project to the class

Participation (20%)
You will be evaluated on your attendance and participation in class discussion. Each student is required to raise questions and give comments on other students' presentations. 
預期每週課後學習時數
 
Office Hours
 
指定閱讀
 
參考書目
Beach, L. R. and T. Connolly (2005), The Psychology of Decision Making. Sage.
Bettman, James R., Mary Frances Luce, and John W. Payne (1998), "Constructive Consumer Choice Processes," Journal of Consumer Research, 25 (December), 187-217.
Caves, R. E. (2002). Creative Industries. Harvard University Press.
Gigerenzer, G./Todd, P.M./ABC Group, eds. 1999. Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
Centola, D. (2010). The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. science, 329(5996), 1194-1197.
Easley, D and J. Kleinberg (2006). Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning About a Highly Connected World. Cambridge University Press, 2010. Goldman, A. I. (1999). Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford.
Franke, N., Keinz, P., & Steger, C. J. (2009). Testing the value of customization: When do customers really prefer products tailored to their preferences? Journal of Marketing, 73(5), 103–121.
Gigerenzer, G. (2007). Gut feelings: the intelligence of the unconscious. Penguin.
Guadagno, R.E., R. B. Cialdinin (2003). Online persuasion and compliance: social influence on the Internet and beyond. In Amichai-Hamburger (Ed.). The Social Net: the social psychology of the Internet.
Holbrook, M. B., & Addis, M. (2008). Art versus commerce in the movie industry: a Two-Path Model of Motion-Picture Success. Journal of Cultural Economics, 32(2), 87-107
Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice. American Psychologist, 58, 697-720.
Devetag, M. G. (1999). From utilities to mental models: a critical survey on decision rules and cognition in consumer choice. Technical Report 2, CEEL (Computable and Experimental Economics Laboratory).
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (Eds.) (2000). Choices, Values, and Frames. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Allen Lane.
Hastie, Dawes (2001). Rational choice in an uncertain world: the psychology of judgment and decision making. Sage.
Hardman, D. (2009). Judgment and Decision Making. Wiley-Blackwell. l
Haubl, G., Trifts, Valerie. (2000). Consumer Decision Making in Online Shopping Environments: The Effects of Interactive Decision Aids. Marketing Science, 19(1), 4.
Koehler, D. and N. Harvey (2004). Judgment and decision making. Blackwell Publishing.
Sheth, J. N. and Mittal, B. (2004). Customer Behavior: a managerial perspective. Thomson.
Newell, B. R., D. A. Lagnodo, and D. R. Shanks (2007). Straight Choices: the psychology of decision making. Psychology Press.
Bayard, P. (2007). How to talk about books you haven't read. Bloomsbury.
Payne, J. W. J. R. Bettman, E. J Johnson (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge University Press.
Lopes, A. B, D. Galletta (2006). Consumer perceptions and willingness to pay for intrinsically motivated online content. Journal of Management Information System, V. 23, N. 2, pp. 203-231.
Mittal, B. (2004). Lack of Attribute Searchability: Some thoughts. Psychology and Marketing, 21(5), 443.
Pirolli, P. (2007). Information foraging theory: Adaptive interaction with information. Oxford series in human-technology interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rothman and Salovey (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: the role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 1, p.3-19. af
Roehrich, G. (2004). Consumer innovativeness: concepts and measurements.Journal of Business Research, 57(6), 671-677.
Sandstrom, P. E. (1994). An Optimal Foraging Approach to Information-seeking and use. Library Quarterly, 64(4), 414-449. Shapiro, C., & Varian, H. R. (1999). Information rules: a strategic guide to the network economy Boston, Mass. :: Harvard Business School Press.
Tang, M.-C. (2009). A study of academic library users’ decision making process: a Len’s model approach. Journal of Documentation, 65(6), 938-957.
Thaler, R. H. Sunstein (2008). Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness.
Wyer, R.S. (2008). "The Role of Knowledge Accessibility in Cognition and Behavior: Implications For Consumer Information Processing," In C. Haugtvedt, F. Kardes, & P. Herr. (Eds.), Handbook of Consumer Psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2008, 31-76.
Carroll, J. S. and Johnson, E. J. (1990). Decision Research: a field guide. Sage.
Hogarth. R. (1987). Judgement and Choice. Wiley.
Hughes et al. (2010).Doctors’ Online Information Needs, Cognitive Search Strategies, and Judgments of Information Quality and Cognitive Authority. JASI&T
Clement. M., D. Proppe, A. Rott (2007). Do Critics Make Bestsellers? Opinon Leaders and the success of Books. Journal of Media Economics 20(2). pp.77-105.
Basuroy, S. Chatterjee, S. and S. A. Ravid (2003). How Critical are Critical Reviews? The Box Office Effects of Film Critics, Star Power, and Budgets. Journal of Marketing, v67, PP. 103-117.
Woudstra, L., B. V. D. Hooff, A. P. Schouten (2012). Dimensions of quality and accessibility:selection of human information sources from a social capital perspective. Information Processing and Managment. 48,pp. 618-630. 
評量方式
(僅供參考)
   
課程進度
週次
日期
單元主題
無資料