課程資訊
課程名稱
質性研究
Qualitative Research 
開課學期
109-1 
授課對象
文學院  圖書資訊學研究所  
授課教師
林珊如 
課號
LIS5051 
課程識別碼
126 U1170 
班次
 
學分
3.0 
全/半年
半年 
必/選修
選修 
上課時間
星期三6,7,8(13:20~16:20) 
上課地點
圖資研討二 
備註
限碩士班以上
總人數上限:8人 
Ceiba 課程網頁
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1091LIS5051_QR 
課程簡介影片
 
核心能力關聯
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖
課程大綱
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
課程概述

本課程為圖書資訊學研究所三學分之選修課。本課程主要在有系統介紹質性研究之哲學,理論基礎及方法論,強調其在圖書資訊學研究中之應用。 

課程目標
學生將透過實例之閱讀與探討,了解並評鑑質性研究在圖書資訊學研究領域之重要性、可行性及其學術之貢獻。學生同時有機會透過此一課程,實際設計應用質性研究方法於圖書資訊學之研究議題,以培養具有評論及從事質性研究之識見與能力。 
課程要求
閱讀討論 書報評論 數位學習 研究實作 口頭報告 書面報告 
Office Hours
備註: 16:10-17:10 
參考書目
【閱讀書目】
1. Neill, S. D. (1992). The dilemma of method for information
research: Is information science a science, social science, or humanity?
In: Dilemmas in the Study of Information: Exploring the Boundaries of
Information Science, (pp. 139-158). New York: Greenwood.
2. Bradley, J. (1993). Methodological issues and practices in
qualitative research. Library Quarterly, 63(4), 431-449.
3. Fidel, R. (1993). Qualitative methods in information retrieval
research. Library & Information Science Research, 15, 219-247.
4. Sonnenwald, Diane H. (1993). Communication in Design. Ph.D.
Dissertation. Rutgers University. # P90 S69z
5. McKechnie, Lynne. (1996). Opening the “Preschoolers’ Door to
Learning”: An Ethnographic Study of the Use of Public Libraries by Preschool
Girls. Ph.D. Dissertation. #Z718.1 M35z
6. Kuhlthau, C. C. (1999). The role of experience in the information
search process of an early career information worker: Perceptions of
uncertainty, complexity, construction and sources. Journal of the American
society for information science, 50(5), 399-412.
7. Reuter, K. A. (2007). Children selecting books in a library:
Extending models of information behavior to a recreational setting. Ph.D.
dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, United States --
Maryland. Retrieved August 25, 2009, from Dissertations & Theses: A&I.
(Publication No. AAT 3260504).
8. Rosenbaum, Howard. (1996). Managers and Information in
Organizations: Towards a structurational concept of the Information Use
Environment of Managers. Ph.D. Dissertation. Syracuse University. #ZA3075
R672
9. Reneker, M. K. (1993). A qualitative study of information seeking
among members of an academic community: Methodological issues and problems.
Library Quarterly, 63(4), 488-507.
10. McKnight, M. (2004). An observational investigation of on-duty
critical care nurses' information behavior in a nonteaching community
hospital. Ph.D. dissertation, University of North Texas, United States --
Texas. Retrieved August 25, 2009, from Dissertations & Theses: A&I.
(Publication No. AAT 3126579).
11. Wang, P.,& White, M.D. (1996). A qualitative study of scholars’
citation behavior. Proceedings of the 59th American Society for Information
Science, 33, 255-261.
12. Song, M. (2007). Modeling situated health information seeking and
use in context: The use of two approaches to grounded theorizing as applied
to 81 sense-making methodology derived narrative interviews of health
situation facing. Ph.D. dissertation, The Ohio State University, United
States -- Ohio. Retrieved August 25, 2009, from Dissertations & Theses: A&I.
(Publication No. AAT 3279782).
13. Kuhlthau, C. C. (1994). Seeking meaning: A process approach to
library and information services. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Chapter 6:
Methodology for studying the constructive process of information seeking,
pp.79-107.
14. Fidel, R. & Pejtersen, A.M. (2004) From information behaviour
research to the design of information systems: the Cognitive Work Analysis
framework. Information Research, 10(1) , 210 [Available at
http://InformationR.net/ir/10-1/paper210.html]
15. Fidel, R., Cleal, B. & Bruce, H. (2004). A multidimensional approach
to the study of human-information interaction: A case study of collaborative
information retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information
Science and Technology, 55(11), 939-953.
16. Fidel, R. (2008). Are we there yet? : Mixed methods research in
library and information science. Library & Information Science Research,
30(4), 265-272.
17. 李郁雅(2000)博士論文研究歷程中情境與資訊行為之探索:以植物分類學為例. 未
出版之碩士論文,臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺北市。(日誌、深度訪談-訪談導引、騰錄稿
範例、理論建構)
18. 李郁雅(2000)。博士論文研究歷程中情境與資訊行為之探索:以植物分類學為
例」。國立臺灣大學圖書館學研究所碩士論文。
19. 楊家驥(2000)。以內容分析法改進網站內容之探討—以自助旅遊為例。國立暨南國
際大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
20. 劉應琳(2001)。閱讀研究:台大BBS Books版愛書人休閒閱讀之探討。國立臺灣大
學圖書館學研究所碩士論文。
21. 林怡璇(2007)。從老年人獲取資訊與通訊科技(ICT)技能的歷程探討數位落差 。
未出版之碩士論文,臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺北市。(田野研究、參與觀察法-邊際人
員、訪談法-騰錄稿範例)
22. 陳啟亮(2007)。書後索引編製行為研究。未出版之碩士論文,臺灣師範大學圖書資
訊學研究所,臺北市。(理論與研究的關聯、訪談、觀察、次級資料分析、資料分析工具)
23. 許禎芸(2007)。提前退休教師日常生活資訊行為模式之探究。未出版之碩士論文,
臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺北市。(理論與研究的關聯、參與觀察法-局外人、深度訪談、
譯碼表)
24. 劉雅芳(2007)。單身女性日常生活資訊行為模式。未出版之碩士論文,臺灣大學圖
書資訊學研究所,臺北市。
25. 蔡尚勳(2007)。深度休閒中的資訊活動:以業餘街舞者為例。未出版之碩士論文,
臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺北市。
26. 賴坤玉(2007)。臺北市銘傳國小學童圖書館使用動機及影響因素之研究。未出版之
碩士論文,臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺北市。(自然探究法、深度訪談-訪談導引、騰錄稿
範例、參與觀察法-局內人、文件分析、田野日誌)
27. 洪元元(2009)。從使用者音樂聆賞歷程探討線上音樂分類架構。未出版之碩士論
文,臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺北市。(深度訪談、文件分析)
28. 蕭雅鴻 (2011 )從教師觀點探究圖書資訊學研究方法課程之教學現況與影響因素。未
出版之碩士論文,臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺北市。(深度訪談-訪談導引、實物搜
集、、、、)
29. 李珮漪(2010)老年人參與公共圖書館志願服務之研究:以臺北市立圖書館為例。未
出版之碩士論文,臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺北市。
30. 李佳玲 (2013) 。中高齡視障者電腦使用動機及對圖書館電子化資源服務需求之研
究。未出版之碩士論文,臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺北市。
31. 徐瑜君( 2013) 。從嬰兒潮世代網路使用行為探討公共圖書館老人科技服務。未出版
之碩士論文,臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺北市。
32. 陳珮雯( 2013) 。從社會性問答網站分析問題類型與資訊引用來源探討失智老年人家
屬照顧者資訊需求特質。未出版之碩士論文,臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺北市。
33. 張雅怡( 2013) 。從志工管理議題探討都會公共圖書館志工之管理。未出版之碩士論
文,臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺北市。
34. 張育真(2013)。大專院校學生網路消費者健康資訊尋求歷程研究。未出版之碩士論
文,臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺北市。
35. 陳慧俐(2014)。越南籍新移民女性生活對策與資訊行為之研究─以臺北市萬華區新
移民服務機構為例。未出版之碩士論文,臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺北市。
36. 蔡靜怡( 2016) 。.公共圖書館失智症照護者健康資訊服務模式之探討。未出版之碩
士論文,臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺北市。
37. 許郁翎( 2016) 。從社會資本觀點看公共圖書館服務對中高齡者之影響。未出版之碩
士論文,臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺北市。
38. 王郁婷(2018) 。公共圖書館老年服務合作模式之研究。未出版之碩士論文,臺灣大
學圖書資訊學研究所,臺北市。
39. 游潔(2018) 。從智慧型手機之社會性軟體應用探究社會支持對活躍老化的影響。未
出版之碩士論文,臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺北市。

【質性研究結果各種寫作實例之參考】
1. 徐宗國(民84)。工作內涵與性別角色。臺北縣:稻鄉。【深度訪談法】
2. 黃儷莉(民88)。人際和諧與衝突:本土化的理論與研究。臺北市:桂冠。【詮釋
學、紮根理論】(詮釋學、紮根理論)
3. 科克 (Koch, P) (1997)。孤獨 (Solitude: A philosophical
encounter) (梁永安譯)。臺北縣:立緒文化。(原作1994年出版)【詮釋學】
4. 科林斯 (Collins, J. C.) (2003)。從A到A+ : 向上提升,或向下沉淪?企
業從優秀到卓越的奧祕 (Good to great why some companies make the leap--and
others don't) (齊若蘭譯)。 臺北市:遠流。 (原作2001年出版)【歸類】
5. 克里斯汀生 (Christensen, C. M.) (2004)。 創新者的解答 (The
innovators solution creating and sustaining successful growth) (李芳齡、李
田樹譯)。臺北市 : 天下雜誌。 (原作2003出版)。【歸類、理論產出】
6. 卡斯塔尼達(Caastaneda, C. )著;魯宓譯(民87)。巫師唐望的教誨。台北市:張老
師文化。 【建議課前閱讀】
7. 契克森米哈賴(Csiksentmihalyi, M.)著;杜明誠譯(民88)。創造力。台北市:時
報文化。【建議課前閱讀】

【相關研究書目】
1. Lychtman, M. (2010). Qualitative Research in Education: A user’s
guide. 教育質性研究實用指南. 江吟梓 蘇文賢合譯。台北市:學富文化。
2. 潘淑滿(2002)。質性研究:理論與應用。台北市:心理。
3. 胡幼慧主編(1996)。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例篇。台北市:巨
流。另有二版,2008年出版。 #540.1 7291 2008
4. Strauss, Anselm & Corbin, Juliet 合著,徐宗國譯。質性研究概論(1997)。
台北:巨流。(譯自 Basics of qualitative research : grounded theory procedures
and techniques)
5. Crabtree, B.F., & Miller, W.L. (Eds.) (1992). Doing Qualitative
Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage publication. 最新質性方法與研究,第二版,黃惠
雯等譯 (1993),台北市:韋伯。
6. Wolcott, H. F. (1990). Writing Up Qualitative Research. Newbury
Park, CA: Sage publication. 質性研究寫作,顧瑜君譯(2001),台北市:五南。
7. Glazier, J. D., Powell, R. R. (1992). Qualitative Research in
Information Management. Englewood, Colo. : Libraries Unlimited.
8. Mellon, C. A. (1990). Naturalistic Inquiry for Library Science :
Methods and Applications for Research, Evaluation, and Teaching. Chapter 1.
New York : Greenwood Press.
9. Sage publications: Qualitative Research Series.

【學位論文】
1. Chu, Clara M. (1992). The Scholarly Process and the Nature of the
Information Needs of the Literary Critic: A Descriptive Model. Ph.D.
Dissertation, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario. #PN81 C48z
2. Chang, Shan-Ju L. (1995). Toward a Multidimensional Framework for
Understanding Browsing. (Ph. D. Dissertation, Rutgers University)
3. Erdelez, Sanda. (1995). Information Encountering: An Exploration
Beyond Information Seeking. Ph.D. Dissertation. Syracuse University.
#ZA3075 E73z
4. Sturgis, Kathleen D. (1997). An Exploration of the Information
Exchange Process: Information-Seeking and Information Dissemination
Behaviors During Organizational Socialization. Ph.D. Dissertation,
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. #HD30.3 S78z
5. Francis, Hannah. (1998). The Information Use Environment: A
descriptive Study of a Sub-set of Agricultruists in the developing country
of Trinidad and Tabago. Ph.D. Dissertation, Syracuse University 電子版
6. Algon, Jacqueline. (1999). The Effect of Task on the Information-
Related Behaviors of Individuals in a Work-Group Environment. Ph.D.
Dissertation, Rutgers University.
7. Moahi, Kgonotso Hildegard. (2000). A Study of the Information
Behavior of Health Care Planners, Managers and Administrators in Botswana
and Implications for the Design of a National Health Information System
(NHIS). Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
8. 劉應琳(2001)。閱讀研究:台大BBS Books版愛書人休閒閱讀之探討。國立臺灣大
學圖書館學研究所碩士論文。 #019.1 7201
9. 楊家驥(2000)。以內容分析法改進網站內容之探討—以自助旅遊為例。國立暨南國
際大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
10. 李郁雅(2000)。博士論文研究歷程中情境與資訊行為之探索:以植物分類學為
例」。國立臺灣大學圖書館學研究所碩士論文。 #028 4047
11. 劉雅芳(2007)。單身女性日常生活資訊行為模式。未出版之碩士論文,臺灣大學圖
書資訊學研究所,臺北市。
12. 蔡尚勳(2007)。深度休閒中的資訊活動:以業餘街舞者為例。未出版之碩士論文,
臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺北市。
13. 林怡璇(2007)。從老年人獲取資訊與通訊科技(ICT)技能的歷程探討數位落差 。
未出版之碩士論文,臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺北市。(田野研究、參與觀察法-邊際人
員、訪談法-騰錄稿範例)
14. 陳慧俐(2014)。越南籍新移民女性生活對策與資訊行為之研究─以臺北市萬華區新
移民服務機構為例。未出版之碩士論文,臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺北市。
15. 張育真(2013)。大專院校學生網路消費者健康資訊尋求歷程研究。未出版之碩士論
文,臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺北市。

【期刊或會議論文集】
1. 世新大學傳播研究所編(2000)。傳僠質性研究方法之發展與省思學術研討會會議論
文。台北市:編者。
2. Bains, S. (1997). End-user searching behavior: considering
methodologies. The Katharine Sharp Review, 4.
Http://edfu.lis.uiuc.edu/review/winter1997/bains.pdf
3. Bradley, J., & Sutton, B. (1993). Reframing the paradigm debate.
Library Quarterly, 63(4), 405-410.
4. Cooper, Linda Z. (2002). A case study of information-seeking
behavior in 7-year-old children in a semistructured situation. Journal of
the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(11):904-922.
5. Dervin, B. (1992). From the mind’s eye of the user: The sense-making
qualitative-quantitative methodology. In J. D. Glazier and R. R. Powell
(Eds.), Qualitative Research in Information Management (pp. 61-84).
Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
6. Ellis, D. (1993). Modeling the information-seeking patterns of
academic researchers: a grounded theory. Library Quarterly, 63(4), 469-486.
7. Fidel, R., et al. (1999). A visit to the information mall: Web
searching behavior of high school students. Journal of American Society of
Information Science, 50, 24-37.
8. Fidel, R., Pejtersen, A. M., Cleal, B., & Bruce, H. (2004). A multi
dimensional approach to the study of human-information interaction: A case
study of collaborative information retrieval. Journal of the American
Society for Information Science, 55(11), 939-953.
9. Iivonen, M. (1996). Completion of quantitative and qualitative
methods: example from a consistency study. Proceedings of Second
International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science:
Integration in Perspective. (pp.149-160).
10. Kwasnik, B.H. (1991). An analysis by means of naturalistic
approaches of two complex behavior. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on
Complex Systems, Ethnomethodology, and Interaction Analysis. AAAI, Boston,
MA.
11. Pettigrew, K. E., Durrance, J. C., Unruh, K. T. (2002). Facilitating
community information seeking using the Internet: findings from three public
library—community network systems. Journal of the American Society for
Information Science and Technology, 53(11), 894-903.
12. Sonnenwald, D. H. (1996). Collaboration during the design process: A
case study of communication, information behavior, and project performance.
In: Information Seeking in Context (pp.179-204). London: Taylor Graham.
13. Wildemuth, B. M. (2002). Effective methods for studying information
seeking and use. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and
Technology, 53(14), 1218-1222.
14. Cooper, L. Z. (2002). Methodology for a project examining cognitive
categories for library information in young children. Journal of the
American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(14), 1223-1231.
15. Tomes, E. G., Duff, W. (2002). “I spent 1 1/2 hours sifting through
one large box….”: Diaries as information behavior of the archives user:
Lessons learned. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and
Technology, 53(14), 1232-1238.
16. Hargittai, E. (2002). Beyond logs and surveys: In-depth measures of
people’s web use skills. Journal of the American Society for Information
Science and Technology, 53(14), 1239-1244.
17. Gorman, P., Lavelle, M., Delcambre, L., Maier, D. (2002). Following
experts at work in their own information spaces: Using observational methods
to develop tools for the digital library. Journal of the American Society
for Information Science and Technology, 53(14), 1245-1250.
18. Heidorn, P. B., Mehra, B., Lokhaiser, M. F. (2002). Complementary
user-centered methodologies for information seeking and use: System’s design
in the biological information browsing environment(BIBE). Journal of the
American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(14), 1251-1258.
19. Mehra, B., Bishop, A. P., Bazzell, I., Smith, C. (2002). Scenarios
in the Afya project as a participatory action research (PAR) tool for
studying information seeking and use across the “digital divide”. Journal of
the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(14), 1259-
1266.

【學位論文】
1. Chu, Clara M. (1992). The Scholarly Process and the Nature of the
Information Needs of the Literary Critic: A Descriptive Model. Ph.D.
Dissertation, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario. #PN81 C48z
2. Sonnenwald, Diane H. (1993). Communication in Design. Ph.D.
Dissertation. Rutgers University.
3. Chang, Shan-Ju L. (1995). Toward a Multidimensional Framework for
Understanding Browsing. (Ph. D. Dissertation, Rutgers University)
4. Erdelez, Sanda. (1995). Information Encountering: An Exploration
Beyond Information Seeking. Ph.D. Dissertation. Syracuse University. #ZA3075
E73z
5. Rosenbaum, Howard. (1996). Managers and Information in
Organizations: Towards a structurational concept of the Information Use
Environment of Managers. Ph.D. Dissertation. Syracuse University. #ZA3075
R672
6. McKechnie, Lynne. (1996). Opening the “Preschoolers’ Door to
Learning”: An Ethnographic Study of the Use of Public Libraries by Preschool
Girls. Ph.D. Dissertation. #Z718.1 M35z
7. 洪曉珊(民91)。從知識管理的角度探討電子商務組織資訊行為之模式。國立臺灣大學
圖書館學研究所碩士論文。 #028 3461
8. 劉應琳(民90)。閱讀研究:台大BBS Books版愛書人休閒閱讀之探討。國立臺灣大學
圖書館學研究所碩士論文。 #019.1 7201
9. 吳淑美(民90)。子宮肌(腺)瘤婦女面臨子宮全切除術之決策樹模式初探。國立臺灣
大學醫學院護理學研究所碩士論文。 #419.7 2638
10. 李郁雅(民89)。博士論文研究歷程中情境與資訊行為之探索:以植物分類學為例。國
立臺灣大學圖書館學研究所碩士論文。 #028 4047
11. 張育真(民102)。大專院校學生網路消費者健康資訊尋求歷程研究。國立臺灣大學圖
書資訊學研究所碩士論文。doi:10.6342/NTU.2013.01653
12. 柯俊如(民104)。以探究社群理論架構探討臺大MOOCs討論區臨場感展現的學科差異。
國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所碩士論文。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/7nnnh2
13. 許郁翎(民105)。從社會資本觀點看公共圖書館服務對中高齡者之影響。國立臺灣大
學圖書館學研究所碩士論文。doi:10.6342/NTU201601225
14. 王郁婷(民107)。公共圖書館老年服務合作模式之研究。國立臺灣大學圖書館學研究
所碩士論文。doi:10.6342/NTU201802215
15. Huang, H. Y. (2011). 知識轉換過程如何加速國際新創事業的國際化-法藍瓷公司個
案研究 (Doctoral dissertation). Available from airiti Library. (U0001-
0407201116432900) doi:10.6342/NTU.2011.00304

【中文質性研究書籍】
1. 卡羅斯 卡斯塔尼達(Carlos caastaneda)著;魯宓譯(民87)。巫師唐望的教誨。台北
市:張老師文化。
2. 米哈里 契克森米哈賴(Mihaly Csiksentmihalyi)著;杜明誠譯(民88)。創造力。台
北市:時報文化。
3. 徐宗國(民84)。工作內涵與性別角色。臺北縣:稻鄉。
4. 張錦華(民90)。女為悅己者瘦?:瘦身廣告風潮、大眾媒介效果、與閱聽人詮釋。臺
北市:女書文化。
5. 黃儷莉(民88)。人際和諧與衝突:本土化的理論與研究。臺北市:桂冠。
6. Koch, Philip(1997)。孤獨(Solitude: A Philosophical Encounter)(梁永
安譯)。臺北縣:立緒文化。
7. 那坦莉高柏(Natalie Goldberg). 心靈寫作。心靈工坊出版。

【相關研究書目】
1. Bradley, J. (1993). Methodological issues and practices in
qualitative research. Library Quarterly, 63(4), 431-449.
2. Dervin, B. (1992). From the mind’s eye of the user: The sense-making
qualitative-quantitative methodology. In J. D. Glazier and R. R. Powell
(Eds.), Qualitative Research in Information Management (pp. 61-84).
Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
3. Ellis, D. (1993). Modeling the information-seeking patterns of
academic researchers: a grounded theory. Library Quarterly, 63(4), 469-486.
4. Fidel, R. (1993). Qualitative methods in information retrieval
research. LISR, 15, 219-247.
5. Kwasnik, B.H. (1991). An analysis by means of naturalistic
approaches of two complex behavior. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on
Complex Systems, Ethnomethodology, and Interaction Analysis. AAAI, Boston,
MA. July 30, 1991.
6. Kuhlthau, C. C. (1994). Seeking meaning: A process approach to
library and information services. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Chapter 6: Methodology
for studying the constructive process of information seeking, pp.79-107.
7. Reneker, M. K. (1993). A qualitative study of information seeking
among members of an academic community: Methodological issues and problems.
Library Quarterly, 63(4), 488-507.
8. The whole issue in JASIS, 53(14) – Perspectives on …Effective methods
for studying information seeking and use.
9. Wildemuth, B. M. (2002). Effective methods for studying information
seeking and use. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and
Technology, 53(14):1218-1222.
10. Cooper, L. Z. (2002). Methodology for a project examining cognitive
categories for library information in young children. Journal of the American
Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(14):1223-1231.
11. Tomes, E. G., Duff, W. (2002). “I spent 1 1/2 hours sifting through
one large box….”: Diaries as information behavior of the archives user:
Lessons learned. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and
Technology, 53(14):1232-1238.
12. Hargittai, E. (2002). Beyond logs and surveys: In-depth measures of
people’s web use skills. Journal of the American Society for Information
Science and Technology, 53(14):1239-1244.
13. Gorman, P., Lavelle, M., Delcambre, L., Maier, D. (2002). Following
experts at work in their own information spaces: Using observational methods
to develop tools for the digital library. Journal of the American Society for
Information Science and Technology, 53(14):1245-1250.
14. Heidorn, P. B., Mehra, B., Lokhaiser, M. F. (2002). Complementary
user-centered methodologies for information seeking and use: System’s design
in the biological information browsing environment(BIBE). Journal of the
American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(14):1251-1258.
15. Mehra, B., Bishop, A. P., Bazzell, I., Smith, C. (2002). Scenarios in
the Afya project as a participatory action research (PAR) tool for studying
information seeking and use across the “digital divide”. Journal of the
American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(14):1259-1266.

【學位論文】
1. [Ethnography] Lenstra, N. (2016). The community informatics of an aging
society: A comparative case study of senior centers and public libraries.
Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. (Link to:
https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/92724/LENSTRA-
DISSERTATION-2016.pdf?sequence=1)
2. [Constructivism] Koh, H. (2015). From reading text to re-designing it: E-
Book design insights from a mixed methods user study of active reading. Ph.D.
Dissertation. Indiana University. (Link to:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/doc/3703332)
3. [Phenomenology] McNeil, B. (2015). A phenomenological study exploring the
leadership development experiences of academic research library leaders. Ph.D.
Dissertation. The University of Nebraska. (Link to:
https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?
article=1104&context=aglecdiss)
4. [Ethnomethodology ] Laureij, L. V. (2013). Supply chain contracting as
disagreement management: Institutionalizing procurement practice through
communication design. Ph.D. Dissertation. The State University of New Jersey ,
New Brunswick.(Link to: https://rucore.libraries.rutgers.edu/rutgers-
lib/41814/)
5. [Symbolic interaction] Neurohr, K. A. (2017). First-generation
undergraduate library users: Experiences and perceptions of the library as
place. Ph.D. Dissertation. Oklahoma State University. (Link to:
https://shareok.org/bitstream/handle/11244/54583/Neurohr_okstate_0664D_15232.p
df?sequence=1&isAllowed=y)
6. [Hermeneutics] Burgess, J. T. F. (2013). Virtue ethics and the narrative
identity of American librarianship 1876 to present. Ph.D. Dissertation. The
University of Alabama.(Link to:
https://search.proquest.com/docview/1447010731?accountid=14229)
7. [Narratology 敘事學] Thorne-Ortiz, F. (2019). Working together: A narrative
inquiry study exploring ongoing collaborations between college librarians and
faculty pairs. Ph.D. Dissertation. Northeastern University. (Link to:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/doc/22624844)
8. [Narrative analysis] Fritch, M. E. L. (2019). Sometimes a teacher,
sometimes not: Connections and voice in critical library instruction. Ph.D.
Dissertation. Kansas State University.(Link to: https://krex.k-
state.edu/dspace/handle/2097/39473)
9.[Complexity theory] Malenfant, K. J. (2011). Understanding faculty
perceptions of the future: Action research for academic librarians. Ph.D.
Dissertation. Antioch University.(Link to:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/doc/3493081)
11. [Grounded theory] Kaplan, S. J. (2018). The everyday life and information
practices of a natural immunity advocate. Ph.D. Dissertation. The University
of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Link to:
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/210600496.pdf
12. [Grounded theory] Thomson, L. E. A. (2019). "'Doing' YouTube": Information
creating in the context of serious beauty and lifestyle YouTube. Ph.D.
Dissertation. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.(Link
to:https://cdr.lib.unc.edu/downloads/6h440z132)
14.[ Orientational qualitative inquiry] Sample, A. R. (2017). Information
literacy: A critical discourse analysis of definitions in library and
information science undergraduate education in the united states. Ph.D.
Dissertation. University of Missouri, Columbia.(Link to:
https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/handle/10355/61964)
15. [Grounded theory] Al-Ahmari, A. (2010). Toward effective information based
decision-making processes in major Arabian Gulf companies using a grounded
theory. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Phoenix. (Link to:
https://search.proquest.com/docview/848930583?accountid=14229)
16. Jarrahi, M. H. (2013). Social technologies and informal knowledge sharing
within and across organizations. Ph.D. Dissertation. Syracuse University.
(Link to: http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/doc/3561459)
17. [Grounded theory] Jackson, J. M. (2013). Managing information overload for
senior leaders in the 21st century. Ph.D. Dissertation. Walden University.
(Link to: https://search.proquest.com/docview/1346184936?accountid=14229)
18.[ Ethnography] Washburn, A. J. (2015). Executive information seeking and
the corporate library. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of North Texas. (Link
to: https://search.proquest.com/docview/1775507231?accountid=14229)

【更多相關研究書目】
1. [Ethnography] Ferreira, S. M., Sayago, S., & Blat, J. (2017). Older
people's production and appropriation of digital videos: An ethnographic
study. Behaviour & Information Technology, 36(6), 557-574. Available at:
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0144929X.2016.1265150
2. [Ethnography on the internet/Netnography 線上/網路民族誌] Yi-Sheng, W.
(2019). Virtual cohabitation in online dating sites: A netnography analysis.
Online Information Review, 43(4), 513-530. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/OIR-
11-2016-0338
3. [Autoethnography] Guzik, E. (2013). Representing ourselves in
information science research: A methodological essay on autoethnography.
Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 37(4), 267. Available at:
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=a9h&AN=94726864&site=ehost-live&scope=site
4. [Phenomenology] Pallud, J., & Monod, E. (2010). User experience of
museum technologies: The phenomenological scales. European Journal of
Information Systems, 19(5), 562-580. Available at:
https://search.proquest.com/docview/1283633561?accountid=14229
5. [Narrative analysis] Jones, S. A. (2013). Illustrating the narrative
process through career stories. School Libraries Worldwide, 19(2), 37-53.
Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=llf&AN=92009071&site=ehost-live&scope=site 
指定閱讀
教科書及參考書目
1. 陳向明(2009)。社會科學質的研究。台北市:五南。<< 教科書>> [2002 初版]
2. 胡幼慧主編(2008)。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例篇。台北市:巨流。[1996 初版]
3. Strauss, Anselm & Corbin, Juliet 合著,徐宗國譯。質性研究概論(民86年)。台北:巨流。(譯自 Basics of qualitative research : grounded theory procedures and techniques)
4. Patton, Michael Quinn. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods。質的評鑑與研究,吳芝儀、李奉儒譯(民85年)。台北:遠流。
5. Mellon, C. A. (1990). Naturalistic Inquiry for Library Science : Methods and Applications for Research, Evaluation, and Teaching. Chapter 1. New York : Greenwood Press.
6. Glazier, J. D., Powell, R. R. (1992). Qualitative Research in Information Management. Englewood, Colo. : Libraries Unlimited.
7. Crabtree, B.F., & Miller, W.L. (Eds.) (1992). Doing Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage publication. 最新質性方法與研究,第二版,黃惠雯等譯 (民92),韋伯。
8. Fielding, N. G. and Fielding, J. L. (1986). Linking Data. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9. Wolcott, H. F. (1990). Writing Up Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage publication. 質性研究寫作,顧瑜君譯(民90),五南。
10. Crabtree, B. F., Miller, W. L. (Eds.) (1992). Doing Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage publication.
11. Sage publications: Qualitative Research Series. 台大 http://methods.sagepub.com/ 
評量方式
(僅供參考)
 
No.
項目
百分比
說明
1. 
平時成績 
15% 
每週學習日誌單(下課前完成)。 
2. 
質性研究文獻評論 
25% 
各篇含書目, 摘要, 評論三部份(5%*5)。 
3. 
習作一 
15% 
訪談實作。 
4. 
習作二 
15% 
觀察記錄。 
5. 
期末書面報告 
30% 
自擬研究題目 (可延伸觀察訪談習作) ,期中提書面研究計畫 [題目,研究問題,研究方法,預計工作進度];期末撰寫研究歷程心得及思考,繳交書面報告及口頭分享。 
 
課程進度
週次
日期
單元主題
第1週
9/16  課程簡介與作業說明 
第2週
9/23  質性研究理論 
第3週
9/30  質性研究的設計 
第4週
10/07  質性研究方法的議題I:研究對象與研究者 
第5週
10/14  質性研究方法的議題II:研究關係與研究場域 
第6週
10/21  資料蒐集:深度訪談法 
第7週
10/28  深度訪談法:訪談中的傾聽與回應 
第8週
11/04  資料蒐集:焦點訪談法 
第9週
11/11  作業回應與檢討 
第10週
11/18  資料蒐集:參與觀察法與實物資料 
第11週
11/25  資料分析:歸類 
第12週
12/02  資料分析:理論建構 
第13週
12/09  質性研究論文的寫成 
第14週
12/16  質性研究品質的檢測:評鑑標準與提昇方法 
第15週
12/23  質性研究趨勢:質量並用 
第16週
12/30  期末報告 
第17週
1/06  期末報告 
第18週
1/13  期末報告及自我評鑑