課程資訊
課程名稱
語法學專題獨立研究
Independent Study in Syntax 
開課學期
102-2 
授課對象
文學院  語言學研究所  
授課教師
宋麗梅 
課號
LING7221 
課程識別碼
142 M1030 
班次
 
學分
全/半年
半年 
必/選修
選修 
上課時間
星期四4(11:20~12:10) 
上課地點
樂學館304 
備註
限本系所學生(含輔系、雙修生)
總人數上限:12人 
 
課程簡介影片
 
核心能力關聯
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖
課程大綱
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
課程概述

This course provides a thorough and detailed discussion in case system and its related linguistic issues including semantic frame, discourse information structure, and transitivity. After probing into different theoretical approaches of case systems, we will turn to the review of previous studies in the case-marking systems of Formosan languages. The models and theoretical grounds in these previous works will be discussed and carefully re-examined. The final mark of this course is to provide an explanation toward the complex interactions of the case-marking system in Vedai Rukai in naturalistic data. 

課程目標
This course provides a thorough and detailed discussion in case system and its related linguistic issues including semantic frame, discourse information structure, and transitivity. After probing into different theoretical approaches of case systems, we will turn to the review of previous studies in the case-marking systems of Formosan languages. The models and theoretical grounds in these previous works will be discussed and carefully re-examined. The final mark of this course is to provide an explanation toward the complex interactions of the case-marking system in Vedai Rukai in naturalistic data. 
課程要求
 
預期每週課後學習時數
 
Office Hours
 
參考書目
Blake, B. J. (2001). Case. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, C. (1983). Topic continuity in written English narrative. Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 313—341.
Croft, W. (1988). Agreement vs. Case Marking and Direct Objects. Agreement in natural language: Approaches, theories, descriptions, 159-179.
Croft, W. (2002). Typology and universals. Cambridge University Press.
Croft, W. (1991). Syntactic categories and grammatical relations: the cognitive organization of information. University of Chicago Press.
Dryer, M. (1997). Are grammatical relations universal. Essays on language function and language type. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 115—143.
Foley, W. A., & Van Valin Jr, R. D. (1984). Functional syntax and universal grammar.
Givon, T. (1978). Definiteness and referentiality. Universals of human language, 4, 291—330.
Givon, T. (Ed.). (1983). Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. J. Benjamins.
Givon, T. (1983). Topic continuity and word order pragmatics in Ute. Topic continuity in discourse: Quantitative cross-language studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 343-363.
Huang, L. M., Yeh, M. M., Zeitoun, E., Chang, A. H., & Wu, J. J. (1998). A typological overview of nominal case marking systems of some Formosan languages. In Selected Papers from the 2nd International Symposium Languages in Taiwan (pp. 21—48).
Lambrecht, K. (1996). Information structure and sentence form: topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge University Press.
Li, P. J. (1997). A syntactic typology of Formosan languages–case markers on nouns and pronouns. Chinese languages and linguistics, 4, 343—378.
Nichols, J. (1986). Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar. Language, 62(1), 56—119.
Starosta, S. (1995). A grammatical subgrouping of Formosan languages. Austronesian studies relating to Taiwan, 683—726.
Starosta, S. (1997). Formosan clause structure: Transitivity, ergativity, and case marking. Chinese languages and linguistics IV: Typological studies of languages in China, 125—154.
Starosta, S. (n.d.). A grammatical typology of Formosan languages. 中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊, 541—576.
Thompson, S. A., & Hopper, P. J. (2001). Transitivity, clause structure, and argument structure: Evidence from conversation. Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, 27-60.
Wang, M. H. (2003). Morphosyntactic Manifestations of Participants in Tona (Rukai). MA Thesis. Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University.
Wang, M. H. (2005). Case Markers in Tona Rukai Revisited: The Distinction between ko and na. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics, 31(2), 1—29.
 
指定閱讀
 
評量方式
(僅供參考)
   
課程進度
週次
日期
單元主題
無資料