課程名稱 |
邏輯思考 Critical Thinking Through Logic |
開課學期 |
113-1 |
授課對象 |
理學院 |
授課教師 |
簡士捷 |
課號 |
COS5001 |
課程識別碼 |
200EU0010 |
班次 |
02 |
學分 |
1.0 |
全/半年 |
半年 |
必/選修 |
選修 |
上課時間 |
第1,2,3,4,5 週 星期四3,4,5(10:20~13:10) |
上課地點 |
博雅308 |
備註 |
本課程以英語授課。密集課程。停修申請截止:9月27日.說明影片: https://youtu.be/si9IrqKNIn4 限理學院學生(含輔系、雙修生) 總人數上限:20人 |
|
|
課程簡介影片 |
|
核心能力關聯 |
本課程尚未建立核心能力關連 |
課程大綱
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
課程概述 |
Logic is a discipline that examines the rules of thinking and drawing conclusions, or in other words, constructing and evaluating arguments. In our daily lives, both personal and academic, we are surrounded by arguments. These arguments might appear on television, or they might appear within academic research. Because of the ubiquity of arguments, it is important to be able to analyze arguments, avoid faulty conclusions in reasoning, understand levels of meaning and kinds of arguments, avoid verbal pitfalls, understand the steps of scientific methods, and identify value assumptions. Through an understanding and practice of logic, or for many, the concept of critical thinking, students will be able to better handle these challenges.
To help students to achieve this, the purpose of this course is to introduce students to basic logical concepts and rules for logical and ultimately critical thinking. Through the process of developing logical thinking and critical thinking skills, this class will utilize a variety of texts for students to analyze and critique. Reading, specifically reading critically, is an essential part of developing logic and critical thinking skills. Because of this, critical reading is embedded as a foundational component in this class. Class reading materials will serve a variety of specific uses, beginning by illustrating specific examples and facets of logic in both academic and popular settings, and ultimately being used as material for students to analyze and critique. The nature of logic, critical thinking, and debate, mean that students will be developing critical reading skills through this process.
This five-week course will focus on some of the most salient aspects of informal logic. Students can be expected to develop a better awareness of the logical structure of thinking, which can be applied to every field of knowledge. |
課程目標 |
Course Objectives:
I. Core Competences (CC)
The purpose of this course is to adhere to the NTU and College of Science educational objectives by contributing to students’
CC 1: Independent judgment and ability to innovate
CC 2: Professional knowledge and skills
CC 3: Communicative and team skills
II. Course Intended Learning Outcome (CILO)
By the end of the course, students should be able to:
CILO 1: distinguish between various types of inductive and deductive arguments
CILO 2: evaluate the works of their own and their peers on deductive arguments for validity and soundness
CILO 3: extract the formal structure of arguments as they occur in ordinary language and evaluate those arguments
CILO 4: identify the informal fallacies within a reasoning process
CILO 5: create logical arguments (both inductive and deductive) in their field of study
CILO 6: Students will be able to develop critical skills and apply these skills to generate their own well-formed arguments |
課程要求 |
1. Attendance and Participation Policy: Because the skills taught in the course are cumulative, regular attendance is necessary. In addition, participation is also crucial to this class format. Regular class attendance and class participation, such as answering questions in class, participating in class discussions, and showing improvement can have a positive effect on your overall semester grade. On the other hand, frequent absences, tardiness, or inattentiveness in class can have a detrimental effect on your final grade. Family emergencies and illnesses will come up and I will take these situations into consideration. Please come to me and explain such reasons. When you miss class, you are responsible for gaining the lecture notes from classmates and finishing any assignments given during the absence.
3. Assignment: The assignment is due on the date specified on the syllabus. It must be typed, double spaced, at least 12 point readable font, and fully proofread; include a title, your name, the date and numbered pages that are either stapled or paper-clipped together. Also, given that you are responsible for keeping a complete folder of your work, make sure to save your papers on a back-up disk and to maintain a hard copy of work you hand in to me.
4. Disruptive behavior, sleeping in class, reading the newspaper or other materials not related to class, or doing work for another class will not be tolerated during class time.
5. A Note on Cell Phones: When we meet as a class, no one in class, especially your instructor, wants to be interrupted by your personal life. If you must carry this kind of device, you need to be sure that it is on vibration. |
預期每週課後學習時數 |
3 hours per week |
Office Hours |
另約時間 備註: by appointment |
指定閱讀 |
1. Hurley, P. J., & Watson, L. (2024). A concise introduction to logic. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
2. Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. (2014). Longman academic writing series: Essays (5th ed.). New York: Pearson Education. |
參考書目 |
1. Beal, J. (2010). Logic: The basics. London: Routledge.
2. Browne, M. N., & Keeley, S. M. (2007). Asking the right questions: A guide to critical thinking. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Bowling Green State University.
3. Caret, C. R., & Hjortland, O. T. (Eds.). (2015). Foundations of logical consequence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press
4. Copi, I. M., Cohen, C., & McMahon, K. (2019). Introduction to Logic. Milton: Routledge.
5. Hardegree, G. M. (2011). Symbolic logic: A first course. New York: McGraw-Hill/Learning Solutions.
6. Hospers, J. (1997). An introduction to philosophical analysis. London: Routledge.
7. Howard-Snyder, F., Howard-Snyder, D., & Wasserman, R. (2020). The power of logic. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
8. Wilson, R. L. (1993). Logic: Deductive, inductive and informal reasoning. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company. |
評量方式 (僅供參考) |
No. |
項目 |
百分比 |
說明 |
1. |
Attendance and Participation |
30% |
|
2. |
Argumentation Assignment |
70% |
|
|
針對學生困難提供學生調整方式 |
上課形式 |
|
作業繳交方式 |
|
考試形式 |
|
其他 |
由師生雙方議定 |
|
週次 |
日期 |
單元主題 |
第1週 |
9/5 |
Informal Logic: Basic Concepts
- Arguments, Premises, and Conclusions
- Recognizing Arguments
- Deduction and Induction |
第2週 |
9/12 |
Informal Logic: Basic Concepts
- Validity, Truth, Soundness, Strength, Cogency
- Argument Forms: Proving Invalidity
- Extended Arguments |
第3週 |
9/19 |
Informal Logic: Fallacies
- Fallacies in General
- Fallacies of Relevance
- Fallacies of Weak Induction |
第4週 |
9/26 |
Argumentation I |
第5週 |
10/3 |
Argumentation II |
|