課程資訊
課程名稱
國際關係專題研究
Seminar on International Relations 
開課學期
108-2 
授課對象
社會科學院  政治學研究所  
授課教師
徐斯勤 
課號
PS8021 
課程識別碼
322 D0720 
班次
 
學分
2.0 
全/半年
半年 
必/選修
選修 
上課時間
星期一6,7(13:20~15:10) 
上課地點
社科研604 
備註
博班核心課程:國際關係。與左正東、蘇宏達、張登及、蔡季廷、唐欣偉、郭銘傑合授
限博士班 且 限本系所學生(含輔系、雙修生)
總人數上限:10人 
Ceiba 課程網頁
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1082PS8021_ 
課程簡介影片
 
核心能力關聯
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖
課程大綱
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
課程概述

本課程為博士班國際關係領域的核心必修課,主旨在於提供博士班同學關於國際政治理論與相關應用方面,較為重要與較為前沿的知識議題。有別於碩士班與學士班在國際關係和國際政治的課程內涵,本課程避免重複討論前二階段應已修習的內容(例如:主要理論典範或理論途徑的基本要素與相關的經典著作),修習本課程者應自行確定已經具備前二階段應有的知識基礎。本課程將從全球的國際關係學界演進的層次上,針對主要理論典範或途徑近年來在理論本身和實際應用上的新發展和新觀點,加以介紹和討論。作為博士班課程,本課程的上課將完全以討論為主,而非講課或學生口頭報告。學生是否能主動積極參與討論,為成績評定的重點。本課程的所有讀物,均納入博士資格考範圍。 

課程目標
本課程為博士班國際關係領域的核心必修課,主旨在於提供博士班同學關於國際政治理論與相關應用方面,較為重要與較為前沿的知識議題。有別於碩士班與學士班在國際關係和國際政治的課程內涵,本課程避免重複討論前二階段應已修習的內容(例如:主要理論典範或理論途徑的基本要素與相關的經典著作),修習本課程者應自行確定已經具備前二階段應有的知識基礎。本課程將從全球的國際關係學界演進的層次上,針對主要理論典範或途徑近年來在理論本身和實際應用上的新發展和新觀點,加以介紹和討論。作為博士班課程,本課程的上課將完全以討論為主,而非講課或學生口頭報告。學生是否能主動積極參與討論,為成績評定的重點。本課程的所有讀物,均納入博士資格考範圍。 
課程要求

(1) 課堂參與及討論(50%):所有修習本課同學,均應於課前閱讀完所有該週讀物,積極參與課堂討論。
(2) 閱讀報告(50%):每位修課同學應挑選四週的主題,撰寫四篇閱讀報告,在該週上課前以電郵方式繳交Word檔(繳交給該週的授課教師)。閱讀報告的內容主要在於整理歸納該週讀物的重點。所謂重點,可能的內含大致有:論文或專章的主要論點(arguments)與推論邏輯、理論或概念架構、研究方法、研究發現、理論意涵等;讀物之間是否呈現出的不同觀點可進行比較,是否存在哪些辯論;對於讀物內容的評論或判斷等。
 
預期每週課後學習時數
 
Office Hours
 
參考書目
 
指定閱讀


Week #1 (3/2): Introduction (徐斯勤教授)

Week #2 (3/9): State of the Field (徐斯勤教授)
- 包宗和主編,《國際關係理論》(台北:五南圖書公司,2011) (自行購買)

Week #3 (3/16): Realism--Theories (唐欣偉副教授)
- John Mearsheimer, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: Norton, 2014), Chapters 1-5.
- Joseph M. Parent and Sebastian Rosato, “Balancing in Neorealism,” International Security, Vol. 40 (2015): 51-86.
- Brian Rathbun, “A Rose by Any Other Name: Neoclassical Realism as the Logical and Necessary Extension of Structural Realism,” Security Studies, 17 (2008): 294-321.

Week #4 (3/23): Realism and Issues/Cases in Security (唐欣偉副教授)
- John Mearsheimer, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: Norton, 2014), Chapters 6-10.
- Victor D. Cha. “Abandonment, Entrapment, and Neoclassical Realism in Asia: The United States, Japan, and Korea,” International Studies Quarterly, 44 (2000): 261–291.
- Charles Glaser. “Will China's Rise Lead to War? Why Realism Does Not Mean Pessimism,” Foreign Affairs 90 (2011): 80-91.

Week #5 (3/30): Theories of Liberalism (I)—Domestic Factors and Interdependence (徐斯勤教
授)
- Andrew Moravcsik, “Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics,” International Organization, Vol. 51, No. 4 (Autumn 1997), pp. 513-553.
- Edward D. Mansfield and Brian M. Pollins, “Interdependence and Conflict: An Introduction,” in Edward D. Mansfield and Brian M. Pollins (eds.), Economic Interdependence and International Conflict: New Perspectives on an Enduring Debate (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2003), pp. 1-30.
- James D. Fearon, “Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 88, No. 3 (September 1994), pp. 577–92.
- Steve Chan, “Progress in the Democratic Peace Research Agenda,” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies (March 2010).
- Henry Farrell and Abraham L. Newman, “Domestic Institutions beyond the Nation-State: Charting the New Interdependence Approach,” World Politics, Vol. 66, No. 2 (April 2014), pp. 331–363.

Week #6 (4/6): Theories of Liberalism (II)—International Institutions (徐斯勤教授)
- Robert O. Kehane and Lisa L. Martin. “The Promise of Institutionalist Theory,” International Security, Vol 20, No. 1 (Summer 1995), pp. 39–51.
- John J. Mearsheimer, “The False Promise of International Institutions,” International Security, Vol. 19, No. 3 (Winter 1994-1995), pp. 5–49.
- Brian Rathbun, “Before Hegemony: Generalized Trust and the Creation and Design of International Security Organizations,” International Organization, Vol. 65, No. 2 (April 2011), pp 243-273.
- Barbara Koremenos, Charles Lipson, and Duncan Snidal. “The Rational Design of International Institutions,” International Organization, Vol. 55, No. 4 (Autumn 2001), pp. 761-800.
- Alexander Wendt, “Driving with the Rearview Mirror: On the Rational Science of Institutional Design,” International Organization, Vol. 55, No. 4 (Autumn 2001), pp. 1019- 1049.

Week #7 (4/13): International Law through the Lens of International Relations (蔡季廷副教授)
- Andrew T. Guzman, How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), Chapter 3, pp. 71-118.
- Ryan Goodman and Derek Jinks, Socializing States: Promoting Human Rights through International Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013), Chapter 2-3, pp. 21-52.
- Emilie M. Hafner-Burton, Brad L. LeVeck, David G. Victor, and James H. Fowler. 2014. “Decision Maker Preferences for International Legal Cooperation,” International Organization, Vol. 68, No. 4, pp. 845-76.
- Karen J. Alter, The New Terrain of International Law: Courts, Politics, Rights, pp. 32-67, 163-198 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2014).
- William W. Burke-White, “Power Shifts in International Law: Structural Realignment and Substantive Pluralism,” 56 Harvard International Law Journal 1 (2015).

Week #8 (4/20): 期中考停課一次

Week #9 (4/27): International Political Economy (I): Mainstream Approaches and
Conventional Issues (郭銘傑助理教授)
- David Lake, “Open Economy Politics: A Critical Review,” The Review of International Organizations, Vol. 4, No. 3 (September 2009), pp. 219-244.
- Edward D. Mansfield and Diana C. Mutz, “Support for Free Trade: Self-Interest, Sociotropic Politics, and Out-Group Anxiety,” International Organization Vol. 63, No. 3 (July 2009), pp. 425-57.
- Kenneth Scheve and Matthew J. Slaughter, “Economic Insecurity and the Globalization of Production,” American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 48, No. 4 (September 2004), pp. 662-674.
- J. Lawrence Broz and Jeffry A. Frieden, “The Political Economy of International Monetary Relations,” Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 4, No. 1 (June 2001), pp. 317-343.

Week #10 (5/4): International Political Economy (II): Emerging Issues (郭銘傑助理教授)
- Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink, “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change,” International Organization, Vol. 52, No. 4 (Autumn 1998), pp. 887-917.
- Robert Keohane and David G. Victor, “The Regime Complex for Climate Change,” Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 9, No. 1 (March 2011), pp. 7-23
- Schneider Christina, and Johannes Urpelainen, “Distributional Conflict Between Powerful States and International Treaty Ratification,” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 57, No. 1 (October 2011), pp, 13-27.
- Margaret Peters, “Open Trade, Closed Borders: Immigration Policy in the Era of Globalization,” World Politics Vol. 67, No. 1 (January 2013), pp. 114-154.

Week #11 (5/11): Rationalism and IR Issues Related to China (張登及教授)
- Michale Beckley “China’s Century? Why America’s Edge Will Endure,” International Security, Vol. 36, No. 3 (Winter 2011/12), pp. 41-78.
- Charles L. Glasser, “Will China’s Rise lead to War? Why Realism Does Not Mean Pessimism,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 90, No. 2 (March/April 2011), pp. 80-91.
- Alastair I. Johnston, “Is China a Status Quo Power?” International Security, Vol. 27, No. 4 (Spring 2003), pp. 5-56.
- M. Taylor Fravel, “Regime Insecurity and International Cooperation: Explaining China's Compromises in Territorial Disputes,” International Security, Vol. 30, No. 2 (Fall 2005), pp. 46-83.


Week #12 (5/18): Reflectivism and IR Issues Related to China (張登及教授)
- David C. Kang, “Getting Asia Wrong: The Need for New Analytical Frameworks,” International Security, Vol. 27, No. 4 (Spring 2003), pp. 57-85.
- David L. Shambaugh, China Goes Global: The Partial Power (Oxford: Oxford University, Press, 2013), Chapter 2, pp. 13-44.
- Chih-yu Shih, “Assigning Role Characteristics to China: The Role State Versus The Ego State,” Foreign Policy Analysis, Vol.8, No. 1 (January 2012), pp. 71-91.
- Feng Zhang, “The Rise of Chinese Exceptionalism in International Relations,” European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 19, No. 2 (2013), pp. 305-328.

Week #13 (5/25): The Relational Turn in IR Theories (張登及教授)
- Patrick Thaddeus Jackson and Daniel H. Nexon, “Relations before States: Substance, Process and the Study of World Politics,” European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 5, No. 3 (September 1999), pp. 291-332.
- Iver Neumann, “Entry into International Society Reconceptualized: The Case of Russia,” Review of International Studies, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 463–484.
- Yaqing Qin, “A Relational Theory of World Politics,” International Studies Review, Vol. 18, No. 1 (March 2016), pp. 33-47.
- Chih-yu Shih, “The Relational Turn East and West: From Chinese Confucianism to Balance of Relationships” Korean Political Science Review, Vol. 51, No. 4 (October 2017), pp. 107-127.

Week #14 (6/1): IR Issues Related to Southeast Asian IR (左正東教授)
- Kai He, “Institutional Balancing and International Relations Theory: Economic Interdependence and Balance of Power Strategies in Southeast Asia,” European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 14, No. 3 (September 2008), pp. 489-518.
- Tony Saich and Evelyn Goh, “Institutions and the Great Power Bargain in East Asia: ASEAN's Limited ‘Brokerage’ Role,” International Relations of the Asia Pacific, Vol. 11, No. 3 (September 2011), pp. 373-401.
- John David Ciorciari, “The Balance of Great-Power Influence in Contemporary Southeast Asia,” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, Vol. 9, No. 1 (January 2009), pp. 157–196.
- Jones David Martin and Michael L. R. Smith, ‘Making Process, Not Progress: ASEAN and the Evolving East Asian Regional Order,’ International Security, Vol. 32, No. 1 (Summer 2007), pp.148 – 184.

Week #15 (6/8): European Integration and the First Wave of Integration Theoretical Debate:
Neofunctionalism vs. Realism (蘇宏達教授)
- 蘇宏達主編,民100年10月,〈歐洲聯盟的歷史發展與理論辯論〉,台北:臺大出版中心。
- 盧倩儀 (2003)。〈區域整合理論〉,黃偉峰主編,《歐洲聯盟的組織與運作》,頁 67-93。台北:五南出版社。
- Frederik, “Old, New and Comparative Regionalism”, in Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism, Chapter 2, 2018.
- Mario Telo, “Regionalism and Global Governance: regionalist studies as a challenge both to neorealism and neoliberalism”, chapter 3 in Still a Western World: Continuity and Change in Global Order, 2016.
- Haas, Ernst B. 1961, “International Integration: the European and the Universal Process,” International Organization 15(3): 366–92
- Stanley Hoffmann, “Obstinate or Obsolete? The Fate of the Nation-State and the Case of Western Europe,” Daedalus, Vol. 95, No. 3, Tradition and Change (Summer, 1966), pp. 862-915

Week #16 (6/15): The Second Wave of Theoretical Debate on European Integration:
Liberal School vs. Intergovernmentalism (蘇宏達教授)
Neofunctionalism
- Dorette Corbey, “Dialectical functionalism: stagnation as a booster of European integration,” International Organization, 49 (2), Spring 1995 , pp. 253-284
Institutionalism
- Laffan, Brigid (2001), “The European Union polity: a union of regulative, normative and cognitive pillars,” Journal of European Public Policy, 8(5), 709-727.
- Hall, P. and Taylor, R. (1999), “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms,” Political Studies, 44(5): 936-957.
- Garrett, G. & Tsebelis, G. (1996), “An Institutional Critique of Intergovernmentalism,” International Organization, 50(2): 269-299.
- Pierson, Paul (1996), “The path to European integration: a historical institutionalism,” Comparative Political Studies, 29(2), 123-163.
- Schimmelfennig, Frank and Sedelmeier, Ulrich (2002), “Theorizing EU enlargement: research focus, hypotheses, and the state of research,” Journal of European Public Policy, 9(4), 500-528.
Liberal intergovernmentalism
- Moravcsik, Andrew (1991), “Negotiating the Single European Act: national interests and governmental statecraft in the European Community,” International Organization, 45(1), 19-56.
- Moravcsik, A. and Nicolaidis, K. (1999), “Explaining the Treaty of Amsterdam: Interests, Influence, Institutions,” Journal of Common Market Studies, 37(1): 59-86.
- 蘇宏達,民99年6月,〈從自由政府間主義解析里斯本條約的發展過程〉,《問題與研究》,第49卷,第2期,頁1-38。
Normative power
- Manners, Ian (2002), “Normative power Europe: a contradiction in terms?” Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), 235-258.
- Hungdah Su, “EU Public Diplomacy in Asia,” Asia Europe Journjal, 14, 2016: 337-351.
Constitutionalism
- Weiler, J.H.H. (2002), “A constitution for Europe? some hard choices,” Journal of Common Market Studies, 40 (4), 563-580.
- Piris, Jean-Claude. 1999, “Does the European Union Have a Constitution? Does It Need One?” European Law Review 24: 557-585.
- 蘇宏達,論歐洲憲法的優位性,歐美研究,37期2卷,2007年6月,頁323-389。
 
評量方式
(僅供參考)
   
課程進度
週次
日期
單元主題
第1週
3/02  Intro 徐斯勤教授 
第2週
3/09  State of the Field 徐斯勤教授 
第3週
3/16  Realism-- Theories 唐欣偉副教授 
第4週
3/23  Realism and Issues in Security 唐欣偉副教授 
第6週
3/30  Theories of Liberalism: Domestic Factors and Interdependence 徐斯勤教授 
第6週
4/06  Theories of Liberalism: International Institutions 徐斯勤教授 
第7週
4/13  International Law Through the Lens of International Relations 蔡季廷副教授 
第8週
4/20  期中考停課乙次 
第9週
4/27  IPE: Mainstream Approaches and Conventional Issues 郭銘傑助理教授 
第10週
5/04  IPE: Emerging Issues 郭銘傑助理教授 
第11週
5/11  Rationalism and IR Issues Related to China 張登及教授 
第12週
5/18  Reflectivism and IR Issues Related to China 張登及教授 
第13週
5/25  The Relational Turn in IR Theories 張登及教授 
第14週
6/01  IR Issues Related to Southeast Asia 左正東教授 
第15週
6/08  European Integration and the Five Wave of Integration Theoretical Debate: Neofunctionalism vs. Realism 蘇宏達教授 
第16週
06/15  The Second Wave of Theoretical Debate on European Integration: Liberal School vs. Integovernmentalism 蘇宏達教授