課程資訊
課程名稱
聯邦主義與分離主義專題
SEMINAR ON FEDERALISM AND SEPARATISM 
開課學期
96-1 
授課對象
社會科學院  政治學研究所  
授課教師
高朗 
課號
PS7529 
課程識別碼
322 M3860 
班次
 
學分
全/半年
半年 
必/選修
選修 
上課時間
星期三5,6(12:20~14:10) 
上課地點
社法研3 
備註
國際關係、比較政治。
限碩士班以上
總人數上限:12人
外系人數限制:2人 
 
課程簡介影片
 
核心能力關聯
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖
課程大綱
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
課程概述

上課時間:週三13:10~15:00
面談時間:週三10:00~12:00;電話:23519641轉445 E-mail: fabius@ntu.edu.tw
課程簡介:本課目的在探討制度與族群政治的關係。課程將從分離主義的起源及其因素談起,進而闡釋聯邦主義的理念與不同的制度框架,分析如何經由聯邦制的設計,各族群於享有自治的前提下,增進對國家的認同。但為何有些國家成功?有些國家卻失敗?本課特別選擇成功與失敗的案例,予以檢視和探討。
 

課程目標
本課目的在探討制度與族群政治的關係。課程將從分離主義的起源及其因素談起,進而闡釋聯邦主義的理念與不同的制度框架,分析如何經由聯邦制的設計,各族群於享有自治的前提下,增進對國家的認同。但為何有些國家成功?有些國家卻失敗?本課特別選擇成功與失敗的案例,予以檢視和探討。 
課程要求
課程要求:研究生上課須積極參與討論,成績由期末報告與上課表現決定。 
預期每週課後學習時數
 
Office Hours
 
參考書目
學期教材:
Birch, Anthony H. Nationalism & National Integration (London: Unwin Hyman Ltd., 1989).
Bordanor, Vernon. Devolution in the United Kingdom (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999).
Buchanan, Allen. Secession: The Morality of Political Divorce from Fort Sumter to Lithuania and
Quebec (Boulder: Westview Press, 1991).
Burgess, Michael & Alain-G. Gagnon, eds., Comparative Federalism and Federation: Competing
Traditions and Future Directions (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1993).
Coakley, John. The Territorial Management of Ethnic Conflict (Portland, Cass, 2003).
Elazar, Daniel J. Exploring Federalism (Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press, 1987).
Lehning, Percy B. 分離主義的理論(台北:韋伯文化事業出版社,2002年)
Linder, Wolf. Swiss Democracy: Possible Solutions to Conflict in Multicultural Societies (New
York: St. Martin's Press).
Morris, Nancy. Puerto Rico: Culture, Politics and Identity (Westport: Praeger, 1995)
Quebec in a New World: The PQ's Plan for Sovereignty (Toronto: James Lorimer & Company,
Publishers, 1994)
Woll, Peter. American Government: Readings and Cases (Boston: Little, Brown and Comp any,
1984)
Wildavsky, Aaron. American Federalism in Perspective (Boston: Little Brown, 1967).
課程進度:
9�21:課程簡介
9�28:分離主義與國家整合(一)
閱讀:Coakley, Chapter 1; Beland & Lecours, “The Politics of Territorial Solidarity,” in Comparative Political Studies (August 2005), 676-703; Buchanan, Chapter 1~3; Michael Eisner, “A Procedural Model for the Resolution of Secessionist Disputes,” in Harvard International Law Journal (Spring 1992), 407~426; Alexis Heraclides, “Succession, Self-Determination and Nonintervention,” in Journal of International Affairs (Winter 1992), 399~420.
10�5:分離主義與國家整合(二)
閱讀:分離主義的理論; Alan Patten, “Democratic Secession from a Multinational State,” in Ethics 112 (April 2oo2), 558-586; Daniel Weinstock, “Constitutionalizing the Right to Secede,” in The Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 9 no. 2 (2001), 182-203; Christopher H. Wellman, “A Defense of Secession and Political Self-Determination,” in Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 24 no. 2 (Spring 1995), 142-171; Jason Sorens, “Globalization, Secessionism, and Autonomy,” in Electoral Studies, vol. 23 (2004), 727-752.
10�12:聯邦制的起源與內涵
閱讀:Elazar, Chapter 1~2; Burgess (ed.), Chapter 1~3; Wildavsky, Chapter 3~4.
10�17:聯邦制的理想與目的 閱讀:Elazar, Chapter 3~5; Burgess (ed.), Chapter 4~6; Ronald L. Watts, “Federal Arrangements: An International Perspective,” in Option Politiques (November 1994), 24~27..
10�24:討論報告大綱
11�2: 聯邦制與中國發展
閱讀:嚴家其,聯邦中國構想; 王麗萍,「聯邦制與中國國家結構」; Gabriella Montinola, Yingyi Qian, and Barry R. Weingast, “Federalism, Chinese Style,” in World Politics (October 1995), 50~81.
11�9: 沒有國家的民族──庫德族問題
閱讀:”The Kurds in Iraq,” in Middle East Policy, vol. 11 no. 1, (Spring 2004), 106-131; Mustafa Saatci, “Nation-States and Ethnic Boundaries: Modern Turkish Identity and Turkish-Kurdish Conflict,” in Nations and Nationalism, vol. 8 no. 4 (2002), 549-564; Paul Kubicek, “Ethnic Conflict and Three-Level Games: Turks, Kurds, and Foreign Actors,” in International Negotiation, vol. 2 (1997), 79-101.
11�16:加拿大聯邦制與魁北克問題
閱讀:Birch, Chapter 8; Alain-G. Gagnon & Guy Laforest, “The Future of Federalism,” in International Journal (Summer 1993), 470~491; Judson Meadwell, “The Politics of Nationalism in Quebec,” in World Politics (January 1993), 203~241; Peter Leslie, “Canada: The Supreme Court Sets Rules for the Secession of Quebec,” in Publius, vol. 29 no. 2, 135~152; Coakley, Chapter, 2; 高朗﹐「魁北克問題與加拿大聯邦體制改革之困境」,政治科學論叢,第七期,頁九九∼一二二。
11�23:俄國聯邦制
閱讀:Carol Skalnik Leff, “Democratization and Disintegration in Multinational States,” in World Politics (January 1999), 205~235; Leff, Chapter 4~5; Sam Nunn & Adm N. Stulberg, “The Many Faces of Modern Russia,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 79 no. 2, 45~62; Sarah F. Iebschutz & Barbara Jancar-Webster, “American and Soviet Perspectives on Federalism”; Coakley, Chapter 9; J.Paul Goode, “The Push for Regional Enlargement in Putin’s Russia,” in Post-Soviet Affairs, vol. 20 no. 3 (2000), 219-257; C. Ross, “Putin’s Federal Reforms and the Consolidation of Federalism in Russia,” in Communist and Post-Communist Studies, vol. 36 (2003), 29-47.
11�30:瑞士聯邦制
閱讀:Linder, Chapter 2~3; Thomas Fleiner, “Recent Developments of Swiss Federalism,” in Publius, vol. 32 no. 2, 97~123; Jan Erk, “Swiss Federalism and Congruence,” in Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, vol. 9 no. 2, (Summer 2003), 50-74; Yannis Papadopoulos, “Connecting Minorities to the Swiss Federal System,” in Publius (Summer 2002), 47-65; Linder and Vatter, “Institutions and Outcomes of Swiss Federalism.”
12�7:英國分權政策與北愛爾蘭問題
閱讀:Birch, Chapter 7; Bogdanor, Chapter 6-7; Coakley, Chapter 3.
12�14:美國聯邦制與波多黎各
閱讀︰ Morris, Chapter 3, 6; Woll, Chapter 8, 11
12�21:聯邦主義與歐洲整合
閱讀: Michael Burgess, “Introduction: Federalism and Building the European Union,” Simon J. Bulmer, “The European Council and the Council of the European Union: Shapers of a European Confederation,” Juliet Lodge, “Federalism and the European Parliament,” Publius (Fall 1996), Vivien A. Schmidt, “European Federalism and Its Encroachments on National Institution”; Michael Keating, “Asymmetrical Government: Multinational States in an Integrating Europe” Publius (Winter).
12�28:課堂報告
1�4:課堂報告
報告參考題目:
(1) 伊拉克聯邦與新憲法
(2) 賽普路斯問題
(3) 大英國協
(4) 獨立國家國協
(5) 巴勒斯坦問題
(6) 新加坡與馬來西亞關係
(7) 種族淨洗
(8) 蘇聯為何崩解?
(9) 南斯拉夫為何分裂?
(10) 南北葉門統一
 
指定閱讀
 
評量方式
(僅供參考)
   
課程進度
週次
日期
單元主題