課程資訊
課程名稱
聯邦主義與分離主義專題
Seminar on Federalism and Separatism 
開課學期
104-1 
授課對象
社會科學院  政治學研究所  
授課教師
高朗 
課號
PS7529 
課程識別碼
322 M3860 
班次
 
學分
全/半年
半年 
必/選修
選修 
上課時間
星期五8,9(15:30~17:20) 
上課地點
社科研606 
備註
國際關係,比較政治,公共行政。
限碩士班以上
總人數上限:30人
外系人數限制:2人 
Ceiba 課程網頁
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1041PS7529_federalis 
課程簡介影片
 
核心能力關聯
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖
課程大綱
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
課程概述

E-mail: fabius@ntu.edu.tw
課程簡介:本課目的在探討制度與族群政治的關係。課程將從分離主義的起源及其因素談起,進而闡釋聯邦主義的理念與不同的制度框架,分析如何經由聯邦制的設計,各族群於享有自治的前提下,增進對國家的認同。但為何有些國家成功?有些國家卻失敗?本課特別選擇成功與失敗的案例,予以檢視和探討。
 

課程目標
本課目的在探討制度與族群政治的關係。課程將從分離主義的起源及其因素談起,進而闡釋聯邦主義的理念與不同的制度框架,分析如何經由聯邦制的設計,各族群於享有自治的前提下,增進對國家的認同。但為何有些國家成功?有些國家卻失敗?本課特別選擇成功與失敗的案例,予以檢視和探討。 
課程要求
課程要求:研究生上課須積極參與討論,成績由期末報告與上課表現決定。 
預期每週課後學習時數
 
Office Hours
備註: 週五 13:20-15:20 
參考書目
Bordanor, Vernon. Devolution in the United Kingdom (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999).
Buchanan, Allen. Secession: The Morality of Political Divorce from Fort Sumter to Lithuania and
Quebec (Boulder: Westview Press, 1991).
Burgess, Michael & Alain-G. Gagnon, eds., Comparative Federalism and Federation: Competing
Traditions and Future Directions (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1993).
Coakley, John. The Territorial Management of Ethnic Conflict (Portland, Cass, 2003).
Elazar, Daniel J. Exploring Federalism (Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press, 1987).
Lehning, Percy B. 分離主義的理論(台北:韋伯文化事業出版社,2002年).
Lijphart, Arend, Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999).
Linder, Wolf. Swiss Democracy: Possible Solutions to Conflict in Multicultural Societies (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).
亦請參考與上課主題相關之期刊,包括Publius, Government and Opposition, Nations and Nationalism.
 
指定閱讀
Elazar, Daniel J. Exploring Federalism (Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press, 1987).
Jesse, Neal G. and Williams, Kristen P. Ethinic Conflict: A Systematic Approach to Cases of Conflict (Washington, D. C., CQ Press, 2011).
Lehning, Percy B. 分離主義的理論(台北:韋伯文化事業出版社,2002年).
Lijphart, Arend, Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999).
 
評量方式
(僅供參考)
   
課程進度
週次
日期
單元主題
第1週
9/18  課程介紹 
第2週
9/25  分離主義與民族自決(一)
閱讀:Jesse and Williams, Chapter 1-2; Coakley, Chapter 1; Beland & Lecours, “The Politics of Territorial Solidarity,” in Comparative Political Studies (August 2005), 676-703; Buchanan, Chapter 1~3; Alfred Stepan, Juan J. Linz, and Yogendra Yadav, “The Rise of “State-Nations” Journal of Democracy, vol. 21no. 3 (July 2010), 50-68.  
第3週
10/2  分離主義與民族自決(二)
閱讀:分離主義的理論; Paul Keal, “Indigenous Self-Determination and the Legitimacy of Soveregin States,” in International Politics, vol. 44(2007), 287-305; Ephraim Nimni, “National-Cultural Autonomy as an Alternative to Minority Territorial Nationalism,” in Ethnopolitics, vol. 6 no. 3 (September 2007), 345-364; Afred Stepan, “Comparative Theory and Political Practice: Do We Need a ‘State-Nation’ Model as Well as a ‘Nation-State’ Model” in Government and Opposition, vol. 43 no.1 (2008), 1-25. 
第4週
10/9  放假 
第5週
10/16  聯邦制與國家整合(一)
閱讀:Elazar, Chapter 1~2; Burgess (ed.), Chapter 1~3; William Riker, “Federalism,” in Governmental Institution and Processes, ed. Fred Greenstein and Nelson Polsby, 91-172; Arend Lijphart, “Constitutional Design for Divided Societies” Journal of Democracy, vol.15 no. 2 (April 2004), 96-109. 
第6週
10/23  聯邦制與國家整合(二)
閱讀:Elazar, Chapter 3~5; Burgess (ed.), Chapter 4~6; Ronald L. Watts, “Federal Arrangements: An International Perspective,” in Option Politiques (November 1994), 24~27;; Henry E. Hale, “Divided We Stand: Institutional Sources of Ethnofederal State Survival and Collapse” World Politics, vol. 56 no. 2 (January 2004), 165-193. 
第7週
10/30  討論報告大綱 
第8週
11/6  聯邦理念與中國發展
閱讀:嚴家其,聯邦中國構想; 王麗萍,「聯邦制與中國國家結構」; Gabriella Montinola, Yingyi Qian, and Barry R. Weingast, “Federalism, Chinese Style,” in World Politics (October 1995), 50~81; Allen Carlson, “A Flawed Perspective: the Limitations Inherent within the Study of Chinese Nationalism,” in Nations and Nationalism, vol. 15 no. 1 (2009), 20-35. 
第9週
11/13  台灣認同與兩岸關係
閱讀:劉義周,「台灣民眾的國家認同──一個新的測量方式;黃昭元主編,兩國論與台灣國家定位。 
第10週
11/20  沒有國家的民族──庫德族問題
閱讀:Yavuz and Gunter, “The Kurdish Nation,” in Current History, (January 2001), 33-39; “The Kurds in Iraq,” in Middle East Policy, vol. 11 no. 1, (Spring 2004), 106-131; Mustafa Saatci, “Nation-States and Ethnic Boundaries: Modern Turkish Identity and Turkish-Kurdish Conflict,” in Nations and Nationalism, vol. 8 no. 4 (2002), 549-564; Paul Kubicek, “Ethnic Conflict and Three-Level Games: Turks, Kurds, and Foreign Actors,” in International Negotiation, vol. 2 (1997), 79-101. 
第11週
11/27  加拿大聯邦制與魁北克問題
閱讀:Birch, Chapter 8; Hilliard Aronovitch, “Seceding the Canadian Way,” in Publius, vol. 36 no. 4 (2006), 541~564; Judson Meadwell, “The Politics of Nationalism in Quebec,” in World Politics (January 1993), 203~241; Peter Leslie, “Canada: The Supreme Court Sets Rules for the Secession of Quebec,” in Publius, vol. 29 no. 2, 135~152; Coakley, Chapter, 2; Patrick Fafard & Francois Rocher, “The Evolution of Federaism Studies in Canada: From Centre to Periphery,” in Canadian Pubic Administration (June 2009), 291-311; 高朗﹐「魁北克問題與加拿大聯邦體制改革之困境」,政治科學論叢,第七期,頁九九∼一二二。 
第12週
12/4  俄國聯邦制
閱讀:Carol Skalnik Leff, “Democratization and Disintegration in Multinational States,” in World Politics (January 1999), 205~235; Leff, Chapter 4~5; Laitin, “Secessionist Rebellion in the Former soviet Union,” in Comparative Political Studies, vol. 34 no. 8 (October 2001), 839-861; Sarah F. Iebschutz & Barbara Jancar-Webster, “American and Soviet Perspectives on Federalism”; Coakley, Chapter 9; J.Paul Goode, “The Push for Regional Enlargement in Putin’s Russia,” in Post-Soviet Affairs, vol. 20 no. 3 (2000), 219-257; C. Ross, “Putin’s Federal Reforms and the Consolidation of Federalism in Russia,” in Communist and Post-Communist Studies, vol. 36 (2003), 29-47; Tomila Lankina, “Regional Developments in Russia: Territorial Fragmentations in a Consolidating Authoritarian State,” in Social Research (Spring 2009), 225-256. 
第13週
12/11  瑞士聯邦制
閱讀:Linder, Chapter 2~3; Thomas Fleiner, “Recent Developments of Swiss Federalism,” in Publius, vol. 32 no. 2, 97~123; Jan Erk, “Swiss Federalism and Congruence,” in Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, vol. 9 no. 2, (Summer 2003), 50-74; Yannis Papadopoulos, “Connecting Minorities to the Swiss Federal System,” in Publius (Summer 2002), 47-65; Linder and Vatter, “Institutions and Outcomes of Swiss Federalism.”  
第14週
12/18  英國分權政策與北愛爾蘭問題
閱讀:Bogdanor, Chapter 6-7; Coakley, Chapter 3: Andrew Gamble, “The Constitutional Revolution in the United Kingdom,” in Publius vol. 36 no. 1 (2006), 19~35; Horowitz, “Explaining the Northern Ireland Agreement: the Sources of an Unlikely Constitutional Consensus,” in British Journal of Political Science, vol. 32 no. 2, 193-221; Charlie Jffery and Daniel Wincott, “Devolution in the United Kingdom: Statehood and Citizenship in Transition,” in Publius vol. 36 no. 1 (2006), 3~18. 
第15週
12/25  巴勒斯坦問題
閱讀:Jesse and Williams, Chapter 7. 
第16週
1/1  放假 
第17週
1/8  學期報告