課程資訊
課程名稱
聯邦主義與分離主義專題
Seminar on Federalism and Separatism 
開課學期
100-2 
授課對象
社會科學院  政治學研究所  
授課教師
高朗 
課號
PS7529 
課程識別碼
322 M3860 
班次
 
學分
全/半年
半年 
必/選修
選修 
上課時間
星期五7,8(14:20~16:20) 
上課地點
社科研2 
備註
總人數上限:20人
外系人數限制:5人 
Ceiba 課程網頁
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1002fs101 
課程簡介影片
 
核心能力關聯
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖
課程大綱
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
課程概述

本課程分成三個部份,第一探討分離主義的起源與理論;第二,探討聯邦主義的理論發展;第三,分析分離主義與聯邦主義在個別國家的發展。 

課程目標
本課目的在探討制度與族群政治的關係。課程將從分離主義的起源及其因素談起,進而闡釋聯邦主義的理念與不同的制度框架,分析如何經由聯邦制的設計,各族群於享有自治的前提下,增進對國家的認同。但為何有些國家成功?有些國家卻失敗?本課特別選擇成功與失敗的案例,予以檢視和探討。另外,也對不同政治制度的設計,對族群權力分享的影響,進行討論。 
課程要求
研究生上課須積極參與討論,成績由期末報告與上課表現決定。 
預期每週課後學習時數
 
Office Hours
備註: 週五13:00~15:00  
參考書目
Birch, Anthony H. Nationalism & National Integration (London: Unwin Hyman Ltd., 1989).
Bordanor, Vernon. Devolution in the United Kingdom (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999).
Buchanan, Allen. Secession: The Morality of Political Divorce from Fort Sumter to Lithuania and
Quebec (Boulder: Westview Press, 1991).
Burgess, Michael & Alain-G. Gagnon, eds., Comparative Federalism and Federation: Competing
Traditions and Future Directions (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1993).
Coakley, John. The Territorial Management of Ethnic Conflict (Portland, Cass, 2003).
Elazar, Daniel J. Exploring Federalism (Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press, 1987).
Lehning, Percy B. 分離主義的理論(台北:韋伯文化事業出版社,2002年).
Lijphart, Arend, Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999).
Linder, Wolf. Swiss Democracy: Possible Solutions to Conflict in Multicultural Societies (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).
Morris, Nancy. Puerto Rico: Culture, Politics and Identity (Westport: Praeger, 1995)
Woll, Peter. American Government: Readings and Cases (Boston: Little, Brown and Comp any,
1984)
Wildavsky, Aaron. American Federalism in Perspective (Boston: Little Brown, 1967).
亦請參考與上課主題相關之期刊,包括Publius, Government and Opposition, Nations and Nationalism.
 
指定閱讀
 
評量方式
(僅供參考)
   
課程進度
週次
日期
單元主題
第1週
2/24  課程簡介 
第2週
3/02  分離主義與民族自決(一)
閱讀:Coakley, Chapter 1; Beland & Lecours, “The Politics of Territorial Solidarity,” in Comparative Political Studies (August 2005), 676-703; Buchanan, Chapter 1~3; Horowitz, Donald, “The Cracked Foundations of the Right to Secede,” Journal of Democracy, vol. 14 no. (April 2003), 5-13; Yoav J. Tenembaum, “The Right of Self-Determination-A Further Principle,” in
in American Diplomacy (January 2009) ; Alexis Heraclides, “Succession, Self-Determination and Nonintervention,” in Journal of International Affairs (Winter 1992), 399~420.
 
第3週
3/09  分離主義與民族自決(二)
閱讀:分離主義的理論; Alan Patten, “Democratic Secession from a Multinational State,” in Ethics 112 (April 2oo2), 558-586;Paul Keal, “Indigenous Self-Determination and the Legitimacy of Soveregin States,” in International Politics, vol. 44(2007), 287-305; Ephraim Nimni, “National-Cultural Autonomy as an Alternative to Minority Territorial Nationalism,” in Ethnopolitics, vol. 6 no. 3 (September 2007), 345-364; Christopher H. Wellman, “A Defense of Secession and Political Self-Determination,” in Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 24 no. 2 (Spring 1995), 142-171; Afred Stepan, “Comparative Theory and Political Practice: Do We Need a ‘State-Nation’ Model as Well as a ‘Nation-State’ Model” in Government and Opposition, Vol. 43 No.1 (2008), 1-25.
 
第4週
3/16  聯邦制與國家整合(一)
閱讀:Elazar, Chapter 1~2; Burgess (ed.), Chapter 1~3; William Riker, “Federalism,” in Governmental Institution and Processes, ed. Fred Greenstein and Nelson Polsby, 91-172.
 
第5週
3/23  聯邦制與國家整合(二) 閱讀:Elazar, Chapter 3~5; Burgess (ed.), Chapter 4~6; Ronald L. Watts, “Federal Arrangements: An International Perspective,” in Option Politiques (November 1994), 24~27; Lijphart, Chapter 1-3. 
第6週
3/30  討論報告大綱 
第8週
4/13  聯邦理念與中國發展
閱讀:嚴家其,聯邦中國構想; 王麗萍,「聯邦制與中國國家結構」; Gabriella Montinola, Yingyi Qian, and Barry R. Weingast, “Federalism, Chinese Style,” in World Politics (October 1995), 50~81; Allen Carlson, “A Flawed Perspective: the Limitations Inherent within the Study of Chinese Nationalism,” in Nations and Nationalism, vol. 15 no. 1 (2009), 20-35. 
第9週
4/20  台灣認同與兩岸關係
閱讀:江宜樺,「當前台灣國家認同論述之反省」;劉義周,「台灣民眾的國家認同──一個新的測量方式」;黃昭元主編,兩國論與台灣國家定位。.
 
第10週
4/27  沒有國家的民族──庫德族問題
閱讀:Yavuz and Gunter, “The Kurdish Nation,” in Current History, (January 2001), 33-39; “The Kurds in Iraq,” in Middle East Policy, vol. 11 no. 1, (Spring 2004), 106-131; Mustafa Saatci, “Nation-States and Ethnic Boundaries: Modern Turkish Identity and Turkish-Kurdish Conflict,” in Nations and Nationalism, vol. 8 no. 4 (2002), 549-564; Paul Kubicek, “Ethnic Conflict and Three-Level Games: Turks, Kurds, and Foreign Actors,” in International Negotiation, vol. 2 (1997), 79-101.
 
第11週
5/04  加拿大聯邦制與魁北克問題
閱讀:Birch, Chapter 8; Hilliard Aronovitch, “Seceding the Canadian Way,” in Publius, vol. 36 no. 4 (2006), 541~564; Judson Meadwell, “The Politics of Nationalism in Quebec,” in World Politics (January 1993), 203~241; Peter Leslie, “Canada: The Supreme Court Sets Rules for the Secession of Quebec,” in Publius, vol. 29 no. 2, 135~152; Coakley, Chapter, 2; Patrick Fafard & Francois Rocher, “The Evolution of Federaism Studies in Canada: From Centre to Periphery,” in Canadian Pubic Administration (June 2009), 291-311; 高朗﹐「魁北克問題與加拿大聯邦體制改革之困境」,政治科學論叢,第七期,頁九九∼一二二。
 
第12週
5/11  俄國聯邦制
閱讀:Carol Skalnik Leff, “Democratization and Disintegration in Multinational States,” in World Politics (January 1999), 205~235; Leff, Chapter 4~5; Laitin, “Secessionist Rebellion in the Former soviet Union,” in Comparative Political Studies, vol. 34 no. 8 (October 2001), 839-861; Sarah F. Iebschutz & Barbara Jancar-Webster, “American and Soviet Perspectives on Federalism”; Coakley, Chapter 9; J.Paul Goode, “The Push for Regional Enlargement in Putin’s Russia,” in Post-Soviet Affairs, vol. 20 no. 3 (2000), 219-257; C. Ross, “Putin’s Federal Reforms and the Consolidation of Federalism in Russia,” in Communist and Post-Communist Studies, vol. 36 (2003), 29-47; Tomila Lankina, “Regional Developments in Russia: Territorial Fragmentations in a Consolidating Authoritarian State,” in Social Research (Spring 2009), 225-256.
 
第13週
5/18  瑞士聯邦制
閱讀:Linder, Chapter 2~3; Thomas Fleiner, “Recent Developments of Swiss Federalism,” in Publius, vol. 32 no. 2, 97~123; Jan Erk, “Swiss Federalism and Congruence,” in Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, vol. 9 no. 2, (Summer 2003), 50-74; Yannis Papadopoulos, “Connecting Minorities to the Swiss Federal System,” in Publius (Summer 2002), 47-65; Linder and Vatter, “Institutions and Outcomes of Swiss Federalism.”
 
第14週
5/25  英國分權政策與北愛爾蘭問題
閱讀:Birch, Chapter 7; Bogdanor, Chapter 6-7; Coakley, Chapter 3: Andrew Gamble, “The Constitutional Revolution in the United Kingdom,” in Publius vol. 36 no. 1 (2006), 19~35; Horowitz, “Explaining the Northern Ireland Agreement: the Sources of an Unlikely Constitutional Consensus,” in British Journal of Political Science, vol. 32 no. 2, 193-221; Charlie Jffery and Daniel Wincott, “Devolution in the United Kingdom: Statehood and Citizenship in Transition,” in Publius vol. 36 no. 1 (2006), 3~18.
 
第15週
6/01  美國聯邦制與波多黎各
閱讀︰ Morris, Chapter 3, 6; Woll, Chapter 8, 11
 
第16週
6/08  聯邦主義與歐洲整合
閱讀: Michael Burgess, “Introduction: Federalism and Building the European Union,” Simon J. Bulmer, “ The European Council and the Council of the European Union: Shapers of a European Confederation,” Juliet Lodge, “Federalism and the European Parliament,” Publius (Fall 1996), Vivien A. Schmidt, “European Federalism and Its Encroachments on National Institution”; Michael Keating, “Asymmetrical Government: Multinational States in an Integrating Europe” Publius (Winter); Laurm Cram, “Identity and European Integration: Diversity as a Source of Integration,” in Nations and Nationalism, vol. 15 no. 1 (2009), 109-128.
 
第17週
6/15  課堂報告