課程資訊
課程名稱
國際政治經濟學專題
Seminar on International Political Economy 
開課學期
108-2 
授課對象
社會科學院  政治學研究所  
授課教師
左正東 
課號
PS7026 
課程識別碼
322 M4150 
班次
 
學分
2.0 
全/半年
半年 
必/選修
選修 
上課時間
星期五3,4(10:20~12:10) 
上課地點
社科研606 
備註
國際關係,公共行政,比較政治。與朱雲漢、郭銘傑合授
限碩士班以上
總人數上限:29人
外系人數限制:2人 
Ceiba 課程網頁
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1082PS7026_ 
課程簡介影片
 
核心能力關聯
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖
課程大綱
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
課程概述


可列印版課程大綱連結:
http://bit.ly/39MmsVy

這是一門國際政治經濟學的文獻導讀課程,課程的內容是針對國際關係專長的研究生設計。本課程將引導同學接觸後冷戰時期,國際政治經濟學領域三個最主要的研究綱領:美國學派和英國學派,以及包括歐陸學派、南美洲學派與中國學派的其他學派。指定閱讀範圍包括這三個研究綱領範疇內的最具影響力的理論性與概念性著作,研究綱領所涉及的實證主義(positivism)與後實證主義(post-positivism)方法論問題,以及示範性的實證研究與個案研究,特別是將不同研究綱領應用在分析當前最重要的議題(例如全球經濟秩序與及全球化的建構、英國脫歐與大衰退、新興市場國家崛起、和自由秩序的未來等)的著作。 

課程目標
「國際政治經濟學」可以幫助我們從全球的視野、從人類整體歷史發展的制高點來了解:有那些重要的歷史趨勢與結構條件,深刻的主宰我們的命運,塑造我們以及自己週遭社會群體的認同、價值與利益,以及限制他們的行動選擇。也可以幫助我們理解與分析,與自己有切身利害關係的重要事件(例如全球金融危機)的背景與影響,以及影響台灣的經濟與政治前景之重要歷史趨勢及其脈絡。狹義的「國際政治經濟學」主要探討國際經濟活動與國際政治的互動關係,特別是國際經濟秩序的變遷、非安全領域的國際合作、全球治理範疇內政策協調與管理機制的運作,以及國家對外經濟政策的形成。廣義的「國際政治經濟學」則試圖在全球層次上,探討我們身處世界的時代特徵與組成原則、國際社會的秩序建構的條件、過程與變遷,國際社會中主要行動者的特質與結構處境(特別是其社會建構的條件,包括認同的塑造與利益的形成)。並試圖分析所有這些全球層次的結構與行動的相互關聯性,及其背後蘊含的權力與支配關係。本課程將試圖同時涵蓋這兩類知識體系的基本範疇。 
課程要求
課程要求包括三個部分: 第一、課堂報告:輪流在課堂上提出指定文獻閱讀報告; 第二、課堂討論:輪流在課堂上針對指定文獻進行討論;第三、期末報告:繳交一份延伸課程主題的批判性文獻檢閱或研究計畫書。該報告須研讀延伸閱讀讀物,並自行搜尋與閱讀相關主題文獻,以對這些文獻進行全面性的批判分析,或提出有理論或經驗貢獻的研究問題;或更進一步提出一份涵蓋上述批判性文獻檢閱的碩士或博士論文研究計畫書初稿。
第三週上課前,排定全學期擔任輪流報告人與討論人的分工。每週擔任課堂閱讀報告的同學,應該準備簡報檔,並於上課前上傳課程網頁;每週擔任討論人的同學,也應準備討論問題清單,並於上課前上傳至課程網頁;未擔任報告人或討論人的同學,亦須閱讀指定文獻並於課堂上參與討論。期中考試當週,學生確認期末報告的方向;期末考週,繳交期末報告。課堂報告占學期成績百分之三十,課堂討論占百分之二十,期末報告占百分之五十。  
預期每週課後學習時數
 
Office Hours
 
參考書目
待補 
指定閱讀
第一週 (3/6)課程導論

指定閱讀::
• Katzenstein, Peter J., Keohane, Robert and Krasner, Stephen. 1998. “International Organization and the Study of World Politics.” International Organization 52(4): 645-686.
• Cohen, Benjamin J., 2007. “The transatlantic divide: Why are American and British IPE so Different?” Review of International Political Economy 14(2): 197-219.
• Keohane, Robert O. 2009. “The Old IPE and the New.” Review of International Political Economy 16(1): 34-46

主題一: 全球化體制

第二週 (3/13) 美國學派:開放經濟體的政治學
(主授課:郭銘傑助理教授)

指定閱讀:
1. David Lake. 2009. “Open Economy Politics: A Critical Review.” Review of International Organizations 4(3): 219-244.
2. Farrell, Henry, and Abraham Newman. 2017. “BREXIT, Voice and Loyalty: Rethinking Electoral Politics in an Age of Interdependence.” Review of International Political Economy 24 (2): 232–47.
3. Owen, Erica, and Stefanie Walter. 2017. “Open Economy Politics and Brexit: Insights, Puzzles, and Ways Forward.” Review of International Political Economy 24 (2): 179–202.

延伸閱讀:
• Oatley, Thomas. 2011. “The Reductionist Gamble: Open Economy Politics in the Global Economy.” International Organization 65(2): 311-341.
• Chaudoin, Stephen, HelenV.Milner, and Xun Pang. 2015. “International Systems and Domestic Politics: Linking Complex Interactions with Empirical Models in International Relations.” International Organization 69 (2): 275–309.
• Blyth, Mark, and Matthias Matthijs. 2017. “Black Swans, Lame Ducks, and the Mystery of IPE’s Missing Macroeconomy.” Review of International Political Economy 24 (2): 203–31.
• Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Stephan Haggard, David A. Lake, and David G. Victor. 2017. “The Behavioral Revolution and International Relations.” International Organization 71(S1): S1-S31.
• Hyde, Susan and Elizabeth N. Saunders. 2020. “Recapturing Regime Type in International Relations: Leaders, Institutions, and Agency Space.” International Organization.
• Rodrik, Dani. 2014. “When Ideas Trump Interests: Preferences, Worldviews, and Policy Innovations.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 28 (1): 189–208.


第三週 (3/20) 貿易政治
(主授課:郭銘傑助理教授)

經典:
• Rogowski, Ronald. 1987. “Political Cleavages and Changing Exposure to Trade.” American Political Science Review 81 (4): 1121–37.

指定閱讀:
1. Hiscox, Michael J. 2002. “Commerce, Coalitions, and Factor Mobility: Evidence from Congressional Votes on Trade Legislation.” American Political Science Review 96 (3): 593–608.
2. Oatley, Thomas. 2017. “Open Economy Politics and Trade Policy.” Review of International Political Economy 24 (4): 699–717.

延伸閱讀::
選民偏好
• Scheve, Kenneth F., and Matthew J. Slaughter. 2001. “What Determines Individual Trade Policy Preferences?” Journal of International Economics 54 (2): 267–92.
• Mayda, Anna Maria, and DaniRodrik. 2005. “Why Are Some People (and Countries) More Protectionist than Others?” European Economic Review 49 (6): 1393–1430.
• Baker, Andy. 2005. “Who Wants Globalization? Consumer Tastes and Labor Markets in a Theory of Trade Policy Beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (4): 924-938
• Mansfield, Edward D., and Diana C. Mutz. 2009. “Support for Free Trade: Self-Interest, Sociotropic Politics, and Out-Group Anxiety.” International Organization 63 (3): 425–57.
• Lü, Xiaobo, Kenneth F. Scheve, and Matthew J. Slaughter. 2010. “Inequity Aversion and the International Distribution of Trade Protection.” American Journal of Political Science 56 (3): 638–55.
• Naoi, Megumi, and Ikuo Kume. 2011. “Explaining Mass Support for Agricultural Protectionism: Evidence from a Survey Experiment during the Global Recession.” International Organization 65 (4): 771– 795.
• Yotam Margalit. 2011. “Costly Jobs: Trade-related Layoffs, Government Compensation, and Voting in U.S. Elections.” American Political Science Review 105 (1): 166–188.
團體遊說
• Grossman, Gene, and Elhanan Helpman. 1994. “Protection for Sale.” American Economic Review 84 (4): 833–50.
• Gawande, Kishore, and Bandyopadhyay Usree. 2000. “Is Protection for Sale? Evidence on the Grossman–Helpman Theory of Endogenous Protection.” Review of Economics and Statistics 82 (1): 139–152.
• Kim, In Song. 2017. “Political Cleavages within Industry: Firm Level Lobbying for Trade Liberalization.” American Political Science Review 111 (1): 1–20.

國內制度
• Bailey, Michael A., Judith Goldstein, and Barry R. Weingast. 1997. “The Institutional Roots of American Trade Policy: Politics, Coalitions, and International Trade.” World Politics 49 (3): 309–38.
• Milner, Helen V., and Keiko Kubota. 2005. “Why the Move to Free Trade? Democracy and Trade Policy in the Developing Countries.” International Organization 59 (1): 107–43.
• Kono, Daniel Y. 2006. “Optimal Obfuscation: Democracy and Trade Policy Transparency.” American Political Science Review 100 (3): 369–84.
• Dean, Adam. 2015. “The Gilded Wage: Profit-Sharing Institutions and the Political Economy of Trade.” International Studies Quarterly 59 (2): 316–329.
• Jensen, J. Bradford, Dennis P. Quinn, and Stephen Weymouth. 2017. “Winners and Losers in International Trade: The Effects on US Presidential Voting.” International Organization 71 (03): 423–57.

國際貿易衝突
• Krasner, Stephen D.1976. “State Power and the Structure of International Trade.” World Politics 28 (3): 317–47
• Grossman, Gene, and Elhanan Helpman. 1995. “Trade Wars and Trade Talks.” Journal of Political Economy 103(4): 675–708.
• Steinberg, Richard H. 2002. “In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-Based Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT/WTO.” International Organization 56(2): 339–374.
• Davis, Christina L. 2004. “International Institutions and Issue Linkage: Building Support for Agricultural Trade liberalization.” American Political Science Review 98 (1): 153–169
• Chaudoin, Stephen. 2014. “Audience Features and the Strategic Timing of Trade Disputes.” International Organization 68 (04): 877–911.
• Busch, Marc L. 2000. “Democracy, Consultation, and the Paneling of Disputes under GATT.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 44 (4): 425–446

國際貿易協定
• Maggi, Giovanni, and Andrès Rodrìguez-Clare. 1998. “The Value of Trade Agreements in the Presence of Political Pressures.” Journal of Political Economy 106 (3):574–601.
• Rosendorff, B. Peter, and Helen V. Milner. 2001. “The Optimal Design of International Trade Institutions: Uncertainty and Escape.” International Organization 55 (4): 829–57.
• Limão, Nuno. 2011. “Preferential Trade Agreements as Stumbling Blocks for Multilateral Trade Liberalization: Evidence for the United States.” American Economic Review 96 (3): 896–914
• Manger, Mark S. 2012. “Vertical Trade Specialization and the Formation of North-South PTAs.” World Politics 64 (4): 622–58.
• Baccini, Leonardo, Pablo M. Pinto, and Stephen Weymouth. 2017. “The Distributional Consequences of Preferential Trade Liberalization: Firm-Level Evidence.” International Organization 71 (02): 373–95
• Baccini, Leonardo, Andreas Dür, Manfred Elsig. 2018 “Intra-Industry Trade, Global Value Chains, and Preferential Tariff Liberalization.” International Studies Quarterly 62 (2): 329–340.

世界貿易組織
• Rose, Andrew K. 2004. “Do We Really Know That the WTO Increases Trade?” American Economic Review 94 (1): 98–114.
• Tomz, Michael, Judith L. Goldstein, and Douglas Rivers. 2007. “Do We Really Know That the WTO Increases Trade? Comment.” American Economic Review 97 (5): 2005–18.
• Goldstein, Judith L., Douglas Rivers, and Michael Tomz. 2007. “Institutions in International Relations: Understanding the Effects of the GATT and the WTO on World Trade.” International Organization 61 (1): 37–67.
• Baldwin, Richard. 2016. “The World Trade Organization and the Future of Multilateralism.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 30 (1): 95–116.


第四週 (3/27) 國際貨幣金融體制
(主授課:左正東教授)

經典:
• Eichengreen, B. (2011). Exorbitant Privilege: The rise and fall of the Dollar and the Future of the International Monetary System. Oxford University Press.

指定閱讀
1. Norrlof, Carla. (2017). "The international political economy of money, macro-money theories and methods." Review of International Political Economy 24(4): 718-736.
2. Quaglia, L., and Spendzharova, A. 2017. Post‐crisis reforms in banking: Regulators at the interface between domestic and international governance. Regulation & Governance, 11(4), 422-437.

延伸閱讀::
國際貨幣與金融研究
• Murau, S., Rini, J., & Haas, A. (2018). The Future of Offshore Dollar Creation: Four Scenarios for the International Monetary System by 2040.
• Kaltenbrunner, A., & Lysandrou, P. (2017). The US Dollar's Continuing Hegemony as an International Currency: A Double‐matrix Analysis. Development and Change, 48(4), 663-691.
• Broz, J. Lawrence, and Jeffry A. Frieden. (2001), "The political economy of international monetary relations." Annual Review of Political Science 4.1: 317-343.

國際貨幣競爭
• Norrlof, Carla. 2014. "Dollar hegemony: A power analysis." Review of International Political Economy 21.5: 1042-1070.
• Germain, R., & Schwartz, H. (2014). The political economy of failure: The euro as an international currency. Review of International Political Economy, 21(5), 1095-1122.
• Cohen, B. J., & Benney, T. M. (2014). What does the international currency system really look like?. Review of International Political Economy, 21(5), 1017-1041.
• Hyoung-Kyu Chey (2012), “Theories of International Currencies and the Future of the World Monetary Order,” International Studies Review 14:1 (March), 51-77.
• Helleiner, Eric, and Anton Malkin. 2012. "Sectoral interests and global money: Renminbi, dollars and the domestic foundations of international currency policy." Open Economies Review 23.1: 33-55.

國際資本管制
• Benjamin J. Cohen, (2016), “The IPE of Money Revisited,” Review of International Political Economy 24:4 (August), 657-680.
• Winecoff, W. K. (2017). Global finance as a politicized habitat. Business and Politics, 19(2), 267-297.
• Selmier, W. T. (2017). An institutional perspective on governance, power, and politics of financial risk. Business and Politics, 19(2), 215-240.
• Grabel, I. (2015). The rebranding of capital controls in an era of productive incoherence. Review of International Political Economy, 22(1), 7-43.
• Chwieroth, J. M. (2014). Controlling capital: the international monetary fund and transformative incremental change from within international organisations. New Political Economy, 19(3), 445-469.

國際銀行管制
• Quaglia, L. (2017). The political economy of post-crisis international standards for resolving financial institutions. New Political Economy, 22(5), 595-609.
• Helgad?ttir, O. (2016). Banking upside down: the implicit politics of shadow banking expertise. Review of International Political Economy, 23(6), 915-940.
• Thiemann, M. (2014). In the shadow of Basel: how competitive politics bred the crisis. Review of International Political Economy, 21(6), 1203-1239.
• Baker, Andrew. 2013. "The new political economy of the macroprudential ideational shift." New Political Economy 18.1: 112-139.
• Pagliari, S., & Young, K. L. (2014). Leveraged interests: Financial industry power and the role of private sector coalitions. Review of International Political Economy, 21(3), 575-610.
• Young, K. L. (2012). Transnational regulatory capture? An empirical examination of the transnational lobbying of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Review of International Political Economy, 19(4), 663-688.
• Lall, R. (2012). From failure to failure: The politics of international banking regulation. Review of International Political Economy, 19(4), 609-638.
• Helleiner, Eric, and Stefano Pagliari. 2011. "The end of an era in international financial regulation? A postcrisis research agenda." International Organization 65.01: 169-200.
• Baker, A. (2010). Restraining regulatory capture? Anglo-America, crisis politics and trajectories of change in global financial governance. International Affairs, 86(3), 647-663.

第五週 (4/3)溫書假(民族掃墓節補假),停課一週

第六週 (4/10)自由國際秩序的歷史變遷
(主授課:朱雲漢教授)

經典:
• Kindleberger, C. P. (1986). The World in Depression, 1929-1939: Revised and enlarged edition (Vol. 4). University of California Press.

指定閱讀:

• 朱雲漢、鄭永年編,2020。《西方中心世界的式微與全球新秩序的興起》。台北:國立台灣大學出版中心。

推薦閱讀:

• 朱雲漢,2020。《全球化的裂解與再融合:中國模式與西方模式誰將勝出?》。台北:天下文化。

延伸閱讀:
• Kindleberger, Charles P. 1986. "International Public Goods without International Government," The American Economic Review 76(1): 1-13
• Duncan Snidal. 1985 "The Limits of Hegemonic Stability Theory," International Organization, 39(4):579-614
• Nye, Joseph S. 2017. "The Kindleberger Trap" Project Syndicate, Jan 9.


主題二: 全球化的許諾與失落


第七週 (4/17)自由國際秩序的危機
(主授課:左正東教授)

經典:
• Joseph Stiglitz, Globalization and Its Discontents Revisited: Anti-Globalization in the Era of Trump, (W. W. Norton & Company, 2017)
• Rodrik, D. (2011). The globalization paradox: why global markets, states, and democracy can't coexist. Oxford University Press.

指定閱讀:
1. Dani Rodrik, "Populism and the Economics of Globalization," Journal of International Business Policy, December 2017. https://drodrik.scholar.harvard.edu/files/dani-rodrik/files/populism_and_the_economics_of_globalization.pdf
2. De Bolle, M., & Zettelmeyer, J. (2019). Measuring the Rise of Economic Nationalism. Peterson Institute for International Economics Working Paper, (19-15).


延伸閱讀:
民粹主義
• Ibsen, M. F. (2019). The populist conjuncture: Legitimation crisis in the age of globalized capitalism. Political Studies, 67(3), 795-811.
• Colantone, I., & Stanig, P. (2018). The trade origins of economic nationalism: Import competition and voting behavior in Western Europe. American Journal of Political Science, 62(4), 936-953.
• Gidron, N., & Hall, P. A. (2017). The politics of social status: Economic and cultural roots of the populist right. The British journal of sociology, 68, S57-S84.
• Inglehart, Ronald, and Pippa Norris. "Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have-Nots and Cultural Backlash." HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series RWP16-026, August 2016.

自由秩序的未來
• Duncombe, C., & Dunne, T. (2018). After liberal world order. International Affairs, 94(1), 25-42.
• Jahn, B. (2018). Liberal internationalism: historical trajectory and current prospects. International Affairs, 94(1), 43-61.
• Colgan, J. D., & Keohane, R. O. (2017). The Liberal Order Is Rigged: Fix It Now or Watch It Wither. Foreign Affairs, 96, 36.
• Acharya, A. (2017). After liberal hegemony: The advent of a multiplex world order. Ethics & international affairs, 31(3), 271-285.
• Nye Jr, J. S. (2017). Will the liberal order survive: The history of an idea. Foreign Aff., 96, 10.

川普震撼
• Patrick, S. M. (2017). Trump and World Order: The Return of Self-Help. Foreign Aff., 96, 52.
• Doug Stokes, "Trump, American hegemony and the future of the liberal international order," International Affairs, Volume 94, Issue 1, 1 (January 2018): 133–150.
• Mead, W. R. (2017). The Jacksonian revolt: American populism and the liberal order. Foreign Aff., 96, 2.
• Ikenberry, G. J. (2017). The plot against American foreign policy: Can the liberal order survive. Foreign Affairs., 96, 2.

英國脫歐
• Schmidt, V. A. (2017). Britain-out and Trump-in: a discursive institutionalist analysis of the British referendum on the EU and the US presidential election. Review of International Political Economy, 24(2), 248-269.
• Owen, E., & Walter, S. (2017). Open economy politics and Brexit: insights, puzzles, and ways forward. Review of International Political Economy, 24(2), 179-202.
• Farrell, H., & Newman, A. (2017). BREXIT, voice and loyalty: rethinking electoral politics in an age of interdependence. Review of International Political Economy, 24(2), 232-247.
• Hozić, A. A., & True, J. (2017). Brexit as a scandal: gender and global trumpism. Review of International Political Economy, 24(2), 270-287.
• Hopkin, J. (2017). When Polanyi met Farage: Market fundamentalism, economic nationalism, and Britain’s exit from the European Union. The British journal of politics and international relations, 19(3), 465-478.
• Jessop, B. (2017). The organic crisis of the British state: Putting Brexit in its place. Globalizations, 14(1), 133-141.
• Berry, C., & Hay, C. (2016). The great British ‘rebalancing’act: The construction and implementation of an economic imperative for exceptional times. The British journal of politics and international relations, 18(1), 3-25.

第八週 (4/24)期中考 停課一週

第九週 (5/1)英國學派與馬克思主義傳統
(主授課:左正東教授)

經典:
• Strange, Susan. States and markets. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2015.

指定閱讀:
1. Blyth, M., & Matthijs, M. (2017). Black Swans, Lame Ducks, and the mystery of IPE's missing macroeconomy. Review of International Political Economy, 24(2), 203-231.
2. Cerny, P. C. (2009). Bridging the transatlantic divide?. In Mark Blyth, ed, Routledge Handbook of International Political Economy (IPE): IPE as a Global Conversation, London: Routledge

延伸閱讀:
英國學派的緣起
• Berry, Craig. "The sick man of IPE: the British School." Routledge Handbook of Global Political Economy, Londres, Routledge, capítulo 4 (2020).
• Cohen, B. J. (2016). Money, power, authority. In Susan Strange and the Future of Global Political Economy (pp. 129-143). Routledge.
• Robert W. Cox (2011), “The ‘British School’ in the Global Context,” in Nicola Phillips and Catherine E. Weaver, eds., International Political Economy: Debating the Past, Present and Future, 119-132.
• Ben Clift and Ben Rosamond (2009), “Lineages of a British International Political Economy,” in Mark Blyth, ed., Routledge Handbook of International Political Economy (IPE): IPE as a Global Conversation, 95-111.
• Langley, B. I. P. (2009). Power-knowledge estranged: from Susan Strange to poststructuralism in British IPE. In Routledge Handbook of International Political Economy (IPE) (pp. 136-149). Routledge.
• Murphy, Craig N. 2009. "Do the Left-Out Matter?,” New Political Economy, 14(3): 357-365.
• Underhill, Geoffrey R. D. 2000. “State, Market, and Global Political Economy,” International Affairs, 76(4)805 - 824.

世界體系與歷史研究
• Hobson, J. M. (2019). What’s at Stake in Doing (Critical) IR/IPE Historiography? The Imperative of Critical Historiography. In Historiographical Investigations in International Relations (pp. 149-169). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
• Germain, R. (2019). EH Carr and IPE: An Essay in Retrieval. International Studies Quarterly, 63(4), 952-962.
• Robinson, W. I. (2011). Giovanni Arrighi: Systemic cycles of accumulation, hegemonic transitions, and the rise of China. New Political Economy, 16(2), 267-280.
• Chase-Dunn, C., & Grimes, P. (1995). World-systems analysis. Annual review of sociology, 21(1), 387-417.
• Arrighi, G. (1994). The long twentieth century: Money, power, and the origins of our times. verso. Introduction and Ch. 1

IPE的跨文明對話
• Helleiner, E., & Wang, H. (2018). Beyond the tributary tradition of Chinese IPE: the indigenous roots of early Chinese economic nationalism. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 11(4), 451-483.
• Helleiner, E., & Rosales, A. (2017). Toward Global IPE: The overlooked significance of the Haya-Mariátegui debate. International Studies Review, 19(4), 667-691.
• Yong, W., & Pauly, L. (2016). Chinese IPE debates on American hegemony (vol 20, pg 1165, 2013). REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL ECONOMY, 23(5), 900-900.
• Vivares, E., & Dolcetti-Marcolini, M. (2016). Two regionalisms, two Latin Americas or beyond Latin America? Contributions from a critical and decolonial IPE. Third World Quarterly, 37(5), 866-882.
• John M. Hobson (2013), “Part I – Revealing the Eurocentric Foundations of IPE: A Critical Historiography of the Discipline from the Classical to the Modern Era,” Review of International Political Economy 20:5 (October), 1024-1054.
• Hobson, J. M. (2013). “Part 2–Reconstructing the non-Eurocentric foundations of IPE: From Eurocentric ‘open economy politics’ to inter-civilizational political economy.” Review of International Political Economy, 20(5), 1055-1081.


第十週 (5/8)金融化與金融危機
(主授課:左正東教授)

經典:
• Helleiner, E. (1996). States and the reemergence of global finance: from Bretton Woods to the 1990s. Cornell University Press.

指定閱讀:
1. Van der Zwan, Natascha. "Making sense of financialization." Socio-economic review 12.1 (2014): 99-129.
2. Nölke, A. (2016). Economic causes of the Eurozone crisis: the analytical contribution of Comparative Capitalism. Socio-Economic Review, 14(1), 141-161.

延伸閱讀:
全球金融的不確定與風險
• Lin, K. H., & Tomaskovic-Devey, D. (2013). Financialization and US income inequality, 1970–2008. American Journal of Sociology, 118(5), 1284-1329.
• Lapavitsas, C. (2011). Theorizing financialization. Work, employment and society, 25(4), 611-626.
• van Treeck, Till (2009), “The political economy debate on ‘financialization’ – a macroeconomic perspective,” Review of International Political Economy, 16(5): 907 - 944
• Konings, M. (2007). The institutional foundations of US structural power in international finance: from the re-emergence of global finance to the monetarist turn. Review of International Political Economy, 15(1), 35-61.
• Krippner, G. R. (2005). The financialization of the American economy. Socio-economic review, 3(2), 173-208.

歐債危機及其他金融危機
• Johnston, A., & Regan, A. (2016). European monetary integration and the incompatibility of national varieties of capitalism. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(2), 318-336.
• Stockhammer, E. (2016). Neoliberal growth models, monetary union and the Euro crisis. A post-Keynesian perspective. New political economy, 21(4), 365-379.
• Van Apeldoorn, B. (2014). The European capitalist class and the crisis of its hegemonic project. Socialist Register, 50(50), 189-206.
• Bordo, M., & James, H. (2014). The European crisis in the context of the history of previous financial crises. Journal of Macroeconomics, 39, 275-284.
• Hall, P. A. (2014). Varieties of capitalism and the Euro crisis. West European Politics, 37(6), 1223-1243.

金融危機的一般性理論
• Chwieroth, J. M., & Walter, A. (2017). Banking crises and politics: a long-run perspective. International Affairs, 93(5), 1107-1129.
• Bonizzi, B. (2016). International financialization and the contradictions of privatized Keynesianism.
• Whalen, C. J. (2013). Post-Keynesian institutionalism after the great recession. European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, 10(1), 12-27.
• Davies, W., & McGoey, L. (2012). Rationalities of ignorance: on financial crisis and the ambivalence of neo-liberal epistemology. Economy and Society, 41(1), 64-83.
• Allen, F., & Carletti, E. (2010). An overview of the crisis: Causes, consequences, and solutions. International Review of Finance, 10(1), 1-26.
• Mishkin., Frederic S., 1999. “Global Financial Instability: Framework, Events, Issues,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(4): 3-20

第十一週 (5/15)勞工與移民
(主授課:左正東教授)

經典:
• Cox, R. W., & Sinclair, T. J. (1996). Approaches to world order. Cambridge University Press.

指定閱讀:
1. Selwyn, B. (2013). Social upgrading and labour in global production networks: A critique and an alternative conception. Competition & Change, 17(1), 75-90.
2. LeBaron, G., & Phillips, N. (2019). States and the political economy of unfree labour. New Political Economy, 24(1), 1-21.

延伸閱讀:
IPE與階級研究
• Las Heras, J. (2019). International Political Economy of Labour and Gramsci’s methodology of the subaltern. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 21(1), 226-244.
• Hürtgen, S. (2014). Labour as a transnational actor, and labour’s national diversity as a systematic frame of contemporary competitive transnationality. Capital & Class, 38(1), 211-223.
• Benjamin Selwyn, "Twenty-first-century International Political Economy: A class-relational perspective," European Journal of International Relations (2015): 1 –25
• Mark Rupert, "Class Powers and the Politics of Global Governance," in Power and Global Governance, Edited by Michael Barnett and Raymond Duvall, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
• Morton, A. D. (2006). The grimly comic riddle of hegemony in IPE: where is class struggle?. Politics, 26(1), 62-72.

移民研究
• Smith, A. A. (2016). Migration, development and security within racialised global capitalism: refusing the balance game. Third World Quarterly, 37(11), 2119-2138.
• Preibisch, K., Dodd, W., & Su, Y. (2016). Pursuing the capabilities approach within the migration–development nexus. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42(13), 2111-2127.
• Suliman, S. (2016). Mobility and the kinetic politics of migration and development. Review of International Studies, 42(4), 702-723.
• Pellerin, Hélène, and Beverley Mullings. "The ‘Diaspora option’, migration and the changing political economy of development." Review of International Political Economy 20.1 (2013): 89-120.
• De Haas, H. (2012). The migration and development pendulum: A critical view on research and policy. International Migration, 50(3), 8-25.
• Phillips, N. (2009). Migration as development strategy? The new political economy of dispossession and inequality in the Americas. Review of International Political Economy, 16(2), 231-259.

全球化與勞權保障
• Gereffi, G., & Lee, J. (2016). Economic and social upgrading in global value chains and industrial clusters: Why governance matters. Journal of business ethics, 133(1), 25-38.
• Barrientos, S., Gereffi, G., & Rossi, A. (2011). Economic and social upgrading in global production networks: A new paradigm for a changing world. International Labour Review, 150(3‐4), 319-340.
• Barrientos, S., Mayer, F., Pickles, J., & Posthuma, A. (2011). Decent work in global production networks: Framing the policy debate. International Labour Review, 150(3‐4), 297-317.
• Evans, P. (2010). Is it Labor’s Turn to Globalize? Twenty-first Century Opportunities and Strategic Responses. Global Labour Journal, Volume 1, Issue 3, 352 - 379
• Mosley, Layna, and Saika Uno. 2007. “Racing to the bottom or climbing to the top? Economic globalization and collective labor rights,” Comparative Political Studies, 40(8): 923-948.
• Naila Kabeer, “Globalization, labor standards, and women's rights: dilemmas of collective (in)action in an interdependent world,” Feminist Economics, Volume 10, Issue 1, 2004, pp. 3 – 35
• Kimberly Ann Elliott & Richard B. Freeman, Can Labor Standards Improve under Globalization? Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2003
• O’Brien, Robert., 2000. “Workers and world order: the tentative transformation of the international union movement,” Review of International Studies, 26, 533–555

主題三: 全球化體制的解構與再建構

第十二週 (5/22):新葛蘭西學派與建構主義
(主授課:左正東教授)

指定閱讀:

1. Overbeek, Henk. 2004. “Transnational class formation and concepts of control: towards a genealogy of the Amsterdam project in international political economy,” Journal of International Relations and Development, 7(2): 113-141.
2. Abdelal, Rawi. "Constructivism as an Approach to International Political Economy." In Routledge Handbook of International Political Economy, edited by Mark Blyth, 57–71. London: Routledge, 2009

延伸閱讀:
• Benjamin Selwyn Gill, Stephen, 1993. “Gramsci and Global Politics: Towards a Post-hegemonic Research Agenda” and “Epistemology, Ontology and the ‘Italian School’,” in Stephen Gill eds., Gramsci, Historical Materialism, and International relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Overbeek, Henk, and Bastiaan van Apeldoorn, eds. 2012. Neoliberalism in Crisis. Palgrave Macmillan. Ch. 1
• Overbeek, Henk W., ed. 1993. Restructuring hegemony in the global political economy: The rise of transnational neo-liberalism in the 1980s. London ; New York :Routledge.
• Bieler, Andreas, and Adam David Morton. 2008. “The deficits of discourse in IPE: Turning base metal into gold?,” International Studies Quarterly, 52(1): 103-128.
• Burch, Kurt, and Robert Allen Denemark, eds. 1997. Constituting international political economy. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
• Palan, Ronen. 2000. “The constructivist underpinnings of the new international political economy.”(chapter14), Global Political Economy: Contemporary Theories. London:Routlede.
• Leander, Anna. 2002. “Do we really need reflexivity in IPE? Bourdieu's two reasons for answering affirmatively,” Review of International Political Economy, 9(4): 601-609.
• Biswas, Shampa. 2011. “Restoring the Political in International Political Economy: Taking Constructivism Seriously,” International Studies Review, 13(4): 672-674.

第十三週 (5/29) 全球發展典範與資本主義多樣性
(主授課:左正東教授)

經典:
• Sen, A. Development As Freedom. Knopf, New York, 1999.

指定閱讀:
1. Amable, B. (2010). Morals and politics in the ideology of neo-liberalism. Socio-Economic Review, 9(1), 3-30.
2. Baccaro, Lucio, and Jonas Pontusson. "Rethinking comparative political economy: the growth model perspective." Politics & Society 44.2 (2016): 175-207.

延伸閱讀:

華盛頓共識之後
• Kaya, A., & Reay, M. (2019). How did the Washington consensus move within the IMF? Fragmented change from the 1980s to the aftermath of the 2008 crisis. Review of International Political Economy, 1-26.
• Güven, A. B. (2018). Whither the post-Washington Consensus? International financial institutions and development policy before and after the crisis. Review of International Political Economy, 25(3), 392-417.
• Babb, S., & Chorev, N. (2016). International organizations: loose and tight coupling in the development regime. Studies in Comparative International Development, 51(1), 81-102.
• Babb, Sarah. 2013. "The Washington consensus as transnational policy paradigm: its origins, trajectory and likely successor." Review of International Political Economy 20.2: 268-297.
• Birdsall, Nancy, and Francis Fukuyama. 2011. "Post-Washington Consensus-Development after the Crisis," Foreign Affairs, 90(2): 45-53.
• Rodrik, Dani, 2006. "Goodbye Washington Consensus, Hello Washington Confusion: Learning from a Decade of Reform." Journal of Economic Literature, 44(4): 973-987.

新自由主義
• Davies, Will. "The new neoliberalism." New Left Review 101 (2016).
• Furceri, D., Loungani, P., & Ostry, J. D. Neoliberalism: oversold. Finance & Development, 53, 2016: 38-41.
• Blyth, M. (2013). Paradigms and paradox: The politics of economic ideas in two moments of crisis. Governance, 26(2), 197-215.
• Mudge, S. L. (2008). What is neo-liberalism?. Socio-economic review, 6(4), 703-731.
• Chwieroth, J. (2007). Neoliberal economists and capital account liberalization in emerging markets. International organization, 61(2), 443-463.
• Campbell, J. L. (1998). Institutional analysis and the role of ideas in political economy. Theory and society, 27(3), 377-409.

BRICS發展模式
• Bishop, M. (2016). Rethinking the political economy of development beyond “the rise of the BRICS”. SPERI Paper, 30.
• Robinson, W. I. (2015). The transnational state and the BRICS: A global capitalism perspective. Third World Quarterly, 36(1), 1-21.
• Fourcade, M. (2013). The material and symbolic construction of the BRICs: Reflections inspired by the RIPE Special Issue. Review of International Political Economy, 20(2), 256-267.
• Becker, U. (2013). Measuring change of capitalist varieties: Reflections on method, illustrations from the BRICs. New Political Economy, 18(4), 503-532.

資本主義多樣性
• Hall, P. A. (2018). Varieties of capitalism in light of the euro crisis. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1), 7-30.
• Baccaro, L., & Pontusson, J. (2016). Rethinking comparative political economy: the growth model perspective. Politics & Society, 44(2), 175-207.
• Bieling, H. J. (2014). Comparative analysis of capitalism from a regulationist perspective extended by neo-Gramscian IPE. Capital & Class, 38(1), 31-43.
• Bruff, I., & Ebenau, M. (2014). Critical political economy and the critique of comparative capitalisms scholarship on capitalist diversity. Capital & Class, 38(1), 3-15.
• Hall, P. A., & Thelen, K. (2009). Institutional change in varieties of capitalism. Socio-economic review, 7(1), 7-34.
• Lane, C., & Wood, G. (2009). Capitalist diversity and diversity within capitalism. Economy and Society, 38(4), 531-551.
• Deeg, R., & Jackson, G. (2006). Towards a more dynamic theory of capitalist variety. Socio-Economic Review, 5(1), 149-179.
• Boyer, R. (2005). How and why capitalisms differ. Economy and society, 34(4), 509-557.
• Allen, M. (2004). The varieties of capitalism paradigm: not enough variety?. Socio-Economic Review, 2(1), 87-108.

第十四週 (6/5)能源及其治理
(主授課:左正東教授)

指定閱讀:
1. Newell, P. (2019). Trasformismo or transformation? The global political economy of energy transitions. Review of International Political Economy, 26(1), 25-48.
2. Falkner, R. (2014). Global environmental politics and energy: mapping the research agenda. Energy Research & Social Science, 1, 188-197.

延伸閱讀:
能源研究
• Kuzemko, C., Lawrence, A., & Watson, M. (2019). New directions in the international political economy of energy. Review of International Political Economy, 26(1), 1-24.
• Kuzemko, C. (2019). Re-scaling IPE: local government, sustainable energy and change. Review of International Political Economy, 26(1), 80-103.
• Kuzemko, C., Keating, M. F., & Goldthau, A. (2018). Nexus-thinking in international political economy: What energy and natural resource scholarship can offer international political economy. In Handbook of the International Political Economy of Energy and Natural Resources. Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Van de Graaf, T., Sovacool, B. K., Ghosh, A., Kern, F., & Klare, M. T. (2016). States, markets, and institutions: Integrating international political economy and global energy politics. In The Palgrave handbook of the international political economy of energy (pp. 3-44). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
• Hancock, K. J., & Vivoda, V. (2014). International political economy: a field born of the OPEC crisis returns to its energy roots. Energy Research & Social Science, 1, 206-216.

環境治理
• Clapp, J., & Helleiner, E. (2012). International political economy and the environment: back to the basics?. International Affairs, 88(3), 485-501.
• Newell, P. (2008). The political economy of global environmental governance. Review of International Studies, 34(3), 507-529.
• Paterson, M., Humphreys, D., & Pettiford, L. (2003). Conceptualizing global environmental governance: from interstate regimes to counter-hegemonic struggles. Global Environmental Politics, 3(2), 1-10.

第十五週 (6/12)布列敦森林體系、新興國家、與全球治理的未來
(主授課:左正東教授)

經典:
• Gill, Stephen, and A. Claire Cutler, eds. New constitutionalism and world order. Cambridge University Press, 2014.
• Oliver Stuenkel, The BRICS and the Future of Global Order, (Lexington Books, 2015).

指定閱讀:
• Orfeo Fioretos & Eugénia C. Heldt (2019) Legacies and innovations in global economic governance since Bretton Woods, Review of International Political Economy, 26:6, 1089-1111
• Stephen, M. D. (2014). Rising powers, global capitalism and liberal global governance: A historical materialist account of the BRICs challenge. European Journal of International Relations, 20(4), 912-938.

延伸閱讀:
IMF & World Bank
• Güven, A. B. (2017). Defending supremacy: how the IMF and the World Bank navigate the challenge of rising powers. International Affairs, 93(5), 1149-1166.
• Park, S. (2017). Accountability as justice for the Multilateral Development Banks? Borrower opposition and bank avoidance to US power and influence. Review of International Political Economy, 24(5), 776-801.
• Güven, A. B. (2017). The World Bank and emerging powers: Beyond the multipolarity–multilateralism conundrum. New Political Economy, 22(5), 496-520.
• Kahler, M. (2016). The global economic multilaterals: will eighty years be enough. Global Governance, 22, 1.
• Kentikelenis, A. E., Stubbs, T. H., & King, L. P. (2016). IMF conditionality and development policy space, 1985–2014. Review of International Political Economy, 23(4), 543-582.
• Vestergaard, J., & Wade, R. H. (2013). “Protecting power: How Western states retain the dominant voice in the World Bank’s governance.” World Development, 46, 153-164.
• Güven, A. B. (2012). The IMF, the World Bank, and the global economic crisis: exploring paradigm continuity. Development and Change, 43(4), 869-898.
• Grabel, I. (2011). Not your grandfather's IMF: global crisis, ‘productive incoherence’ and developmental policy space. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 35(5), 805-830.
• Broome, A. (2010). The International Monetary Fund, crisis management and the credit crunch. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 64(1), 37-54.

新興國家的發展金融
• Wang, H. (2017). New multilateral development banks: Opportunities and challenges for global governance. Global Policy, 8(1), 113-118.
• Gregory T. Chin (2016) Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: Governance Innovation and Prospects. Global Governance, January-March 2016, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 11-25.
• Callaghan, M., & Hubbard, P. (2016). The Asian infrastructure investment bank: Multilateralism on the silk road. China Economic Journal, 9(2), 116-139.
• Reisen, H. (2015). Will the AIIB and the NDB help reform multilateral development banking?. Global Policy, 6(3), 297-304.
• Chin, G. T. (2014). The BRICS‐led development bank: purpose and politics beyond the G20. Global Policy, 5(3), 366-373.
• Khanna, P. (2014). New BRICS bank a building block of alternative world order. New Perspectives Quarterly, 31(4), 46-48.

全球治理議程
• Stephen, M. D. (2017). Emerging powers and emerging trends in global governance. Global governance, 23(3), 483.
• Duggan, N. (2015). BRICS and the Evolution of a New Agenda within Global Governance. In The European Union and the BRICS (pp. 11-25). Springer, Cham.
• Dierckx, S. (2013). After the crisis and beyond the new constitutionalism? The case of the free movement of capital. Globalizations, 10(6), 803-818.
• Cammack, P. (2003). The governance of global capitalism: a new materialist perspective. Historical Materialism, 11(2), 37-59.
• Gill, S. (2002). Constitutionalizing inequality and the clash of globalizations. International Studies Review, 4(2), 47-65.

第十六週(6/19)期末考週,繳交書面期末報告

第十七週(6/26)端午節調整放假

第十八週(7/3)彈性補充教學-不上課

 
評量方式
(僅供參考)
   
課程進度
週次
日期
單元主題
第1週
3/06  課程介紹 
第2週
3/13  美國學派:開放經濟體的政治學 
第3週
3/20  貿易政治
導讀:暖婷 
第4週
3/27  國際貨幣金融體制
導讀:暖婷 
第5週
4/3  溫書假(民族掃墓節補假),停課一週 
第6週
4/10  自由國際秩序的歷史變遷
朱雲漢教授演講 
第7週
4/17  自由國際秩序的危機
導讀:衍文 
第8週
4/24  期中考 停課一週
決定期末報告主題 
第9週
5/1  英國學派與馬克思主義傳統
導讀:怡雯 
第10週
5/8  金融化與金融危機
導讀:冠樺 
第11週
5/15  勞工與移民
導讀:宜鋒、阪井 
第12週
5/22  新葛蘭西學派與建構主義
導讀:江涵 
第13週
5/29  全球發展典範與資本主義多樣性
導讀:竣文 
第14週
6/5  能源及其治理
導讀:宜鋒、阪井 
第15週
6/12  布列敦森林體系、新興國家、與全球治理的未來
導讀:昀曄 
第16週
6/19  期末考週,繳交書面期末報告 
第17週
6/26  端午節調整放假 
第18週
7/3  彈性補充教學-不上課