課程資訊
課程名稱
政治社會學專題討論
SEMINAR ON POLITICAL SOCIOLOGY 
開課學期
97-1 
授課對象
社會科學院  社會學研究所  
授課教師
林國明 
課號
Soc7034 
課程識別碼
325 M3400 
班次
 
學分
全/半年
半年 
必/選修
選修 
上課時間
星期二6,7,8(13:20~16:20) 
上課地點
社110 
備註
限碩士班以上
總人數上限:15人 
Ceiba 課程網頁
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/971polisoc 
課程簡介影片
 
核心能力關聯
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖
課程大綱
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
課程概述

先介紹這門課所界定的政治社會學的領域和範圍。我們理解社會是差異的結合﹔不同的社會人群可能具有不同的利益、價值與認同,也控制不同程度的資源,他們共同生活在民族-國家的邦界所劃定的政治社群中。社會差異與分歧,如何影響個人與團體取得控制國家組織的權力,來決定政治社群的集體事務?不同的利益、價值與認同,如何被轉化為國家的政策?反過來說,國家組織如何企圖以強制性的手段來影響資源的分配與社會活動規則,或甚至轉化社會結構,塑造集體目標、認同與文化標準?政治社會學,廣義來說,就是在探討國家與社會的權力關係與互動,瞭解政治的社會基礎和對社會生活的塑造作用。
個人或團體如何控制和影響國家組織的活動與政策,以及國家組織如何介入社會事務的運作,決定於政治生活如何在幾個制度領域中被組織起來。這些制度領域包括﹕(一)國家機關統治結構的組織安排;(二)個人與社會團體是否能夠,以及如何結合成自主性的組織,透過集體行動和相互溝通,來尋找及表達特定的價值、利益與團結,以及(三)控制公共權力與國家機關的正當性權利,透過何種制度安排來取得。不同政權形式 — 民主的、威權的、極權的 — 影響國家權力取得與操作的型態。 根據這樣的認識,這門政治社會學課程,將要探討幾個主要的研究領域﹕國家組織與國家社會關係;民主體制與民主化;公民社會與公共領域;以及政治社群如何處理分配、差異與認同的衝突。
傳統有關政治過程的討論,大多預設以「民族國家」(nation-state)為政治共同體的基本單位。在當今所謂「全球化」的時代中,民族國家的效能與正當性,已經受到許多挑戰與質疑。本課程最後的部分,將討論全球化對福利國家和與公民資格(citizenship)的演變所造成的影響。
 

課程目標
這門導論課將介紹政治社會學幾個主要的研究領域與議題,幫助學生瞭解並思索這些研究領域的知識累積、核心爭議與不同取徑。本課程也可幫助社會學博士班學生準備政治社會學的資格考試。 
課程要求
(一) 上課之前,閱讀完指定的文章。
(二) 每週由同學輪流就指定閱讀文章作報告;上課成員應積極地介入參與討論。口頭報告與課堂討論佔學期成績30﹪。
(三) 期末論文考試(essay exam),於學期結束後兩週內繳交。佔學期成績70%。
 
預期每週課後學習時數
 
Office Hours
另約時間 
指定閱讀
 
參考書目
以下的專書著作請修課學生自行購
買。其他選文,已影印裝訂成冊,
可以到誠品影印店購買。

◎ Giddens, Anthony著; 胡宗澤,
趙力濤譯, 2002;民族-國家與暴
力,臺北縣新店市 : 左岸文化出
版,第一章至第五章
◎ Lijphart, Arend著; 高德源
譯,2001,《民主類型 : 三十六個
現代民主國家的政府類型與表
現》,臺北 : 桂冠
◎ Tarrow, Sidney着; 吴庆宏译,
2005,运动中的力量 : 社会运动
与斗争政治,译林出版社
 
評量方式
(僅供參考)
 
No.
項目
百分比
說明
1. 
期末考 
70% 
 
2. 
口頭報告與課堂參與 
30% 
 
 
課程進度
週次
日期
單元主題
第1週
9/16  Introduction to the course 
第2週
9/23  Basic concepts and different approaches <br/><br/>
Scott, John. 2004. Studying Power. in Kate Nash & Alan Scott eds., The Balckwell Companion to Political Sociology. Pp. 82-91<br/><br/>
Poggi, Gianfranco. 2004. Theories of State Formation, in Kate Nash & Alan Scott eds., The Balckwell Companion to Political Sociology. Pp. 95-106.<br/><br/>
Beetham, David. Political Legitimacy. in Kate Nash & Alan Scott eds., The Balckwell Companion to Political Sociology. Pp. 107-116
Levi, Margaret. 2002. The State of the Study of the State, in I. Katznelson and H. V. Milner eds. Political Sciences: State of the Discipline. Pp. 33-55. New York: Norton.<br/> 
第3週
9/30  State centralism and historical institutionalism<br/><br/>
Skocpol, Theda.1985. "Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research. Pp. 3-37" in Bringing the State Back in, edited by P. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer, and T. Skocpol. New York: Cambridge University Press. <br/><br/>
Pierson, Paul., and Theda Skocpol, 2002, Historical Institutionalislm in Contemporary Political Science, in I. Katznelson and H. V. Milner eds. Political Sciences: State of the Discipline. Pp. 693-721. New York: Norton. <br/><br/>
Amenta, Edwin. 2004. State-centered and Political Institutional Theory: Retrospect and Prospect. In Thomas Janoski et.al., eds. The Handbook of Political Sociology : States, Civil Societies, and Globalization , Cambridge ; New York : Cambridge University Press, pp. 96-114 
第4週
10/07  Governmentality and “state-in-society” perspectives <br/><br/>
Foucault, Michel. 1991. “Governmentality.” In G. Burchell et. al., eds. The Foucault Effect. Pp. 87-104. Chicago : University of Chicago Press<br/><br/>
Scott, James. 1996. “State Simplifications: Nature, Space and People.” Pp. 42-85. In I. Shapiro & R. Hardin (eds.) Political Order. New York: New York University Press.<br/><br/>
Migdal, Joel S., 2001. State in Society: Studying How States and Societies Transform and Constitute One Another. Pp. 41-57. New York: Cambridge University Press. 
第5週
10/14  Modernity and formation of the nation-states (1) <br/><br/>
Giddens, Anthony. 1987. The Nation-State and Violence. University of California Press. Ch.1-ch5. <br/><br/>
【中譯】<br/>
Giddens, Anthony著; 胡宗澤,趙力濤譯, 2002;民族-國家與暴力,臺北縣新店市 : 左岸文化出版,第一章至第五章 
第6週
10/21  Modernity and formation of the nation-states (1I) <br/><br/>
Giddens, Anthony. 1987. The Nation-State and Violence. University of California Press. Ch.6-ch10. <br/><br/>
【中譯】<br/>
Giddens, Anthony著; 胡宗澤,趙力濤譯, 2002;民族-國家與暴力,臺北縣新店市 : 左岸文化出版,第六章至第十章 
第7週
10/28  Ideas of Democracy <br/><br/>
Dahl, Robert. 1989. “A Theory of Democratic Processes.” In Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Pp. 106-118<br/><br/>
Habermas, J. 1996. “Three Normative Models of Democracy.” Pp. 21-30.In S. Benhabid ed. Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton: Princeton University Press.<br/><br/>
Dahl, Robert A. et. al., eds., 2003. The Democracy Sourcebook, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 5-47. [ excerpts from Joseph Schumpeter; Adam Przeworski’ Amy Gutmann and Dennis Thompson; James S. Fishkin; Larry Diamond; Carole Pateman.] 
第8週
11/04  Institutional Variations of Democratic Regimes<br/><br/>
Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns Of Democracy : Government Forms And Performance In Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven : Yale University Press<br/><br/>
【中譯】<br/>
Lijphart, Arend著; 高德源譯,2001,民主類型 : 三十六個現代民主國家的政府類型與表現,臺北市 : 桂冠 
第9週
11/11  Democratic Transition and Consolidation <br/><br/>
Linz, Juan J. and Alfred Stepan, 1996, Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Pp. 3-65.<br/><br/>
Mahoney, James. 2003. Knowledge Accumulation in Comparative Historical Research: The Case of Democracy and Authoritarianism. In James Mahoney and Dietrich Rueschemeyer eds., Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Pp. 131-174  
第10週
11/18  Economy, Democracy and Government Performance<br/><br/>
Govrevitch, Peter., 2008. The Role of Politics in Economic Development. Annual Review of Political Science. Vol. 11: 137-159<br/><br/>
Dahl, Robert A., et. al., eds. 2003. The Democracy Sourcebook. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Pp.420-426, 436-443, 448-454. [excerpts from Kark de Schweinitz Jr., Mancur Loson, Adam Przeworskt et. al. ]<br/><br/>
Treisman, Daniel, 2007. What Have We Learned about the Causes of Corruption from Ten Years of Cross-National Empirical Research. Annual Review of Political Science. Vol. 10: 211-244 
第11週
11/25  Public Sphere and Civil Society<br/><br/>
Habermas, Jurgen. 1996. Civil Society and the Political Public Sphere. In Between Facts and Norms. Pp.327-387. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 
第12週
12/02  Social Movements <br/><br/>
Tarrow, Sidney. 1995. Power in Movement. New York: Cambridge University Press. <br/><br/>
【中譯】<br/>
Tarrow, Sidney&#30528;; &#21556;&#24198;宏&#35793;,2005,&#36816;&#21160;中的力量 : 社&#20250;&#36816;&#21160;与斗&#20105;政治,&#35793;林出版社 
第13週
12/09  The Politics of the Welfare States <br/><br/>
Myles, John and Jill Quadagno, 2002, Political Theories of the Welfare State, Social Service Review, vol. 76(1): 34-57<br/><br/>
Pierson, Paul. 2000, Three Worlds of Welfare State Research. Comparative Political Studies, 33:791821 
第14週
12/16  Cultural Identity and the Politics of Recognition <br/><br/>
Benhabib, Seyla. 2002. From Redistribution to to Recognition? The Paradigm Change of Contemporary Politics. In The Claims of Culture: Equality and Diversity in the Global Era. PP. 49-81. Princeton University Press. <br/><br/>
Fraser, Nancy. 1997. From Redistribution to Recognition? Dilemmas of Justice in a “Postsocialist” Age, in Justice Interruptus. Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist” Condition. New York: Routledge, pp. 11-39.<br/><br/>
Young, Iris Marion. 1997. “Unruly Categories: A Critique of Nancy Fraser’s Dual Systems Theory.” New Left Review: 147-160 
第15週
12/23  Diversity, Multiculturalism and Deliberative Democracy<br/><br/>
Fraser, Nancy. 1997. Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy, in Justice Interruptus. Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist” Condition. New York: Routledge, pp. 69-98.<br/><br/>
Young, Iris Marion. 1997. Difference as a Resource for Democratic Communication. In James Bohman and William Rehg eds. Deliberative Democracy. Pp. 383-406. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.<br/><br/>
Benhabib, Seyla. 2002. Deliberative Democracy and Multicultural Dilemma. In The Claims of Culture: Equality and Diversity in the Global Era. PP. 105-146. Princeton University Press.<br/><br/> 
第16週
12/30  Globalization and the challenges to the welfare states <br/><br/>
Swank, Duane. 2002. Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States. New York: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 15-66.<br/><br/>
Huber, Evelyne., and John D. Stephens. 2004. State Economic and Social Policy in Global Capitalism. In n Thomas Janoski et.al., eds. The Handbook of Political Sociology : States, Civil Societies, and Globalization , Cambridge ; New York : Cambridge University Press, pp. 607-629<br/><br/> 
第17週
1/06  Globalization and the challenges to citizenship<br/><br/>
Held, David., 1996. The Decline of the Nation State. Pp. 407-417. in Becoming Nation. G. Eley and R. Suny. Eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.<br/><br/>
Soysal, Y. N. 2004. Postnational Citizenship: Reconfiguring the Familiar Terrain. In Kate Nash & Alan Scott eds., The Blackwell Companions to Political Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 630-654.<br/><br/>
Habermas, J. 2001. The Postnatoinal Constellation and the Future of Democracy. Pp. 58-112. in The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays. Cambridge: Polity Press.<br/><br/>
【中譯】<br/>
Habermas, J.著; 曹衛東譯,2002,後民族格局:哈伯瑪斯政治論文集,台北:連經,pp.73-138<br/><br/>