課程資訊
課程名稱
 質性研究法專論
Special Topics in Qualitative Research 
開課學期
 108-2 
授課對象
 醫學院  護理學研究所  
授課教師
 張秀如 
課號
 NURSE8031 
課程識別碼
 426 D4450 
班次
  
學分
 2.0 
全/半年
 半年 
必/選修
 必修 
上課時間
 星期三3,4(10:20~12:10) 
上課地點
 護討論室1 
備註
 與吳佳儀合授
限博士班
總人數上限：15人 
Ceiba 課程網頁
 http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1082NURSE8031_1 
課程簡介影片
 
核心能力關聯
 核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖
課程大綱
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
課程概述

The purpose of this course is to introduce doctoral students to the field of qualitative research and prepare them in theoretic basis, skills, techniques, and knowledge. 

課程目標
 The course aims to prepare students for research by:
1.To develop scholarly curiosity about qualitative inquiry
2.To compare and contrast theoretical orientations of qualitative inquiry
3.To understand the conduct of qualitative research and data generation
4.To expand knowledge basis of selected topics using qualitative inquiry
5.To create a critical and supportive learning atmosphere 
課程要求
 1. Punctuality, attendance, and active participation are expected.
2. Reading and discussion: Students are required to read all required readings before class. Raise one questions related to the readings to the discussant prior to the class and make one copy of the question list to the faculty for the class discussion.
3. Critical review: Write 1 critical review for the one selected qualitative research article. Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Each review (2-3 pages in single space) is due on May 11. Each review begins with a brief summary of the study and follows with your critical comments.
4. Presentation of proposal: Conduct a proposal of a topic that interests you with the emphasis on the qualitative studies. Prepare 20 minutes presentation, plus 15 minutes discussion, of your insight how the method enrich the knowledge base of the selected topic. Share your experiences of data collection and analysis. This presentation begins on June 01. This proposal (10-15 pages in single space) is due on June 20. 
預期每週課後學習時數
  
Office Hours
  
指定閱讀
 1. Baran, M.L., & Jones, J.E. (2016). Mixed Methods Research for Improved Scientific Study. Hershey, Pennsylvania : IGI Global. [台大醫圖線上圖書- 第1-5章, p.1-105]
2. Chan, AWK, Chair, SY, Sit, JWH, Wong, EML, Lee, DTF, Fung, OWM. (2016). Case-Based Web Learning Versus Face-to-Face Learning: A Mixed-Method Study on University Nursing Students. Journal of Nursing Research, 24(1):31-40.
3. Chang, S. R., Kenney, N. J., & Chao, Y. Y. M. (2010). Transformation in self-identity amongst Taiwanese women in late pregnancy: A qualitative study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 47(1), 60-6.
4. Chang, S. R., Chao (Yu), Y. M., & Kenney, N. J. (2006). I am a woman and I’m pregnant: Body image of women in Taiwan during the third trimester of pregnancy. Birth, 33, 147-153.
5. Chen ALY, Wu CY*, Lee MB, Yang LT. (2020). Suicide and associated psychosocial correlates among university students in Taiwan: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Formosan Medical Association. [In Press, Accepted Jan. 2020]
6. Chenail, R. George, S., Wulff, D., & Copper, R. (2012). Ch18: Action research: the methodologies. In Munhall, P. (Ed.). Nursing research: a qualitative perspective (5th ed.)(pp.455-470). MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
7. Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed). Los Angeles: Sage. [圖資系圖書室 一般圖書區 (HA29 C7724 2015)]
8. Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Sage Publications. [總圖4F科技資料區 (HM511 C76 1998)]
9. Errasti-Ibarrondo, B., Jordan, J. A., Diez-Del-Corral, M. P., & Arantzamendi, M. Conducting phenomenological research: Rationalizing the methods and rigour of the phenomenology of practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2018; 74, 1723-1734. doi: 10.1111/jan.13569
10. Hinshaw, A. S., Feetham, S. L. & Shaver, J. L. (1999). Handbook of clinical nursing research. Thousand Oaks: Sage. [電子書]
11. Hollway, W. & Jefferson, T. (2012). Doing qualitative research differently: free association, narrative and the interview method. London: Sage.
12. Lee, T. I., Sheu, S. J., Chang, H. C., Hung, Y. T., Tseng, L. M., Chou, S. S., ... & Liu, Y. C. (2019). Developing a Web-Based Comic for Newly Diagnosed Women With Breast Cancer: An Action Research Approach. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(2), e10716.
13. Matua, G. A., & Van Der Wal, D. M. Differentiating between descriptive and interpretive phenomenological research approaches. Nurse Researcher, 2015; 22, 22-27. doi: 10.7748/nr.22.6.22.e1344
14. Molloy L., Walker, K. & Lakeman, R. (2017). Shared worlds: multi-sited ethnography and nursing research. Nurse Researcher, 24 (4), 22-26.
15. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed). Thousand Oaks: Sage. [圖資系圖書室 一般圖書區 (H62 P3218 2015)]
16. SAGE Research Methods. (2015). Mixed Methods Research. http://methods.sagepub.com/video/mixed-methods-research [台大醫圖線上影視資料]
17. Strandås M, Bondas T. The nurse–patient relationship as a story of health enhancement in community care: A meta-ethnography. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2018;74:11–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13389
18. Streubert, H. J. & Carpenter D. R. (2011). Qualitative research in nursing: Advancing the humanistic imperative (5th ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
19. Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International journal for quality in health care, 19(6), 349-35
20. Valade, R. (2012). Ch19: Examplar: " I've waited for something like this all my life": PAR and persons with intellectual disabilities. In Munhall, P. (Ed.). Nursing research: a qualitative perspective (5th ed.)(pp.471-488). MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
21. van Belle E, Giesen J, Conroy T, et al. (2019). Exploring person‐centred fundamental nursing care in hospital wards: A multi‐site ethnography. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 00, 1-12. https ://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15024
22. Wu CY*, Lin WH, Lee MB, Lin JY, Huang CW, Liao SC. (2014). Integrating suicide prevention program into clinical nursing education: A focus group study. Journal of Medical Education, 18(2), 81-91.
23. Wu CY*, Lee MB, Hwang TJ, Chen TF. (2016). A focus group study exploring perceived stress and coping skills among medical and non-medical college students. Journal of Medical Education, 20(1), 33-44.
24. Wu CC, Lin CC, Chang SC, Chou HL. (2019). Identifying the positive energy for retention in clinical nurses: A focus group study. Journal of Nursing Management, 27, 6, 1200 – 1207.
25. Wilson, C. (2014). Interview Techniques for UX Practitioners: A User-Centered Design Method. Chap.5 Focus groups. [台大醫圖線上圖書- 第5章, p.83-111] [補充教材]
26. Zahavi, D., & Martiny, K. M. M. Phenomenology in nursing studies: New perspectives. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 2019; 93, 155-162. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.01.014
Critical review
 Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed). Los Angeles: Sage. [圖資系圖書室 一般圖書區 (HA29 C7724 2015)]
 Cohen, D.J. & Crabtree, B.F. (2008). Evaluation criteria for qualitative research in health care: Controversies and Recommendations. Annals of Family Medicine, 6(4), 331-339.
 Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. [圖資系圖書室 一般圖書區 (H62 P3218 2015)]
 Streubert, H. J. & Carpenter D. R. (2011). Qualitative research in nursing: Advancing the humanistic imperative (5th ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
 
參考書目
  
評量方式
(僅供參考)
    
課程進度
週次
日期
單元主題
第3週
 03/18  Ethnography & Strategies and observation methods 
第5週
 04/01  Action research 
第7週
 04/15  Mixed methods 
第9週
 4/29  Focus group