課程名稱 |
質性研究法專論 Special Topics in Qualitative Research |
開課學期 |
111-2 |
授課對象 |
醫學院 護理學研究所 |
授課教師 |
吳佳儀 |
課號 |
NURSE8031 |
課程識別碼 |
426ED4450 |
班次 |
|
學分 |
2.0 |
全/半年 |
半年 |
必/選修 |
必修 |
上課時間 |
星期三2,3(9:10~11:10) |
上課地點 |
護討論室1 |
備註 |
本課程以英語授課。與王雅青、孫凡軻合授 限博士班 總人數上限:15人 |
|
|
課程簡介影片 |
|
核心能力關聯 |
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖 |
課程大綱
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
課程概述 |
The purpose of this course is to introduce doctoral students to the field of qualitative research and prepare them in theoretic basis, skills, techniques, and knowledge. |
課程目標 |
The objectives of this course are:
1. To develop scholarly curiosity about qualitative inquiry
2. To understand the defining features of the traditions in qualitative research
3. To compare and contrast theoretical orientations of qualitative inquiry
4. To understand the conduct of qualitative research and data generation
5. To expand knowledge basis of selected topics using qualitative inquiry
6. To create a critical and supportive learning atmosphere |
課程要求 |
1. Punctuality, attendance, and active participation are expected.
2. Reading and discussion: Students are required to read all required readings before class. Raise at least one question related to the readings to the discussant prior to the class and make one copy of the question list to the faculty for the class discussion.
3. Critical review: Write 1 critical review for the one selected qualitative research article. Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Each review (2-3 pages in 1.5 space) is due on 19th April. Each review begins with a brief summary of the study and follows with your critical comments.
4. Presentation of proposal: Conduct a proposal of a topic that interests you with the emphasis on the qualitative studies. Prepare presentation and discussion of your insight how the method enrich the knowledge base of the selected topic. Share your qualitative study design and procedure based on the guiding textbook in each class, if appropriate, during 1st March and 3rd May. A written work (15-20 pages in 1.5 space) is due on 7th June.
|
預期每週課後學習時數 |
2 hours on average |
Office Hours |
另約時間 備註: Interview as needed |
指定閱讀 |
1. Billups, F.D. (2021). Qualitative data collection tools: Design, development, and applications. SAGE. [台大線上圖書] |
參考書目 |
2. ^Baran, M. L., & Jones, J. E. (2016). Mixed Methods Research for Improved Scientific Study. Hershey, Pennsylvania : IGI Global. [台大線上圖書-第1-5章, p.1-105]
3. ^Chan, A. W. K., Sit, J. W. H., Wong, E. M. L., Lee, D. T. F., & Fung, O. W. M. (2016). Case-based web learning versus face-to-face learning: A mixed-method study on university nursing students. Journal of Nursing Research, 24(1):31-40. https://doi.org/ 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000104
4. Chang, S. R., Kenney, N. J., & Chao, Y. Y. M. (2010). Transformation in self-identity amongst Taiwanese women in late pregnancy: A qualitative study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 47(1), 60-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.06.007
5. Chang, S. R., Chao (Yu), Y. M., & Kenney, N. J. (2006). I am a woman and I’m pregnant: Body image of women in Taiwan during the third trimester of pregnancy. Birth, 33, 147-153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0730-7659.2006.00087.x
6. ^ Chen, H. Y., & Boore, J. R. (2009). Using a synthesised technique for grounded theory in nursing research. Journal of clinical nursing, 18(16), 2251-2260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02684.x
7. ^Chen, A. L. Y., Wu, C. Y*., Lee, M. B., & Yang, L. T. (2020). Suicide and associated psychosocial correlates among university students in Taiwan: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Formosan Medical Association. [In Press, Accepted Jan. 2020]
8. ^Chenail, R., George, S., Wulff, D., & Copper, R. (2012). Ch18: Action research: The methodologies. In Munhall, P. (Ed.). Nursing research: a qualitative perspective (5th ed.) (pp.455-470). MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
9. Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed). Los Angeles: Sage. [圖資系圖書室 一般圖書區 (HA29 C7724 2015)]
10. ^Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Sage Publications. [總圖4F科技資料區 (HM511 C76 1998)]
11. ^De Chesnay, M. (2014). Chapter 1: overview of ethnography. In: De Chesnay, M. (Ed.). Nursing research using ethnography: qualitative designs and methods in nursing, (pp. 1–14). Springer Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1891/9780826134660 (e-Book)
12. Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (2017). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (5th. ed). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
13. ^Errasti-Ibarrondo, B., Jordan, J. A., Diez-Del-Corral, M. P., & Arantzamendi, M. (2018). Conducting phenomenological research: Rationalizing the methods and rigour of the phenomenology of practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 74(7), 1723-1734. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13569
14. ^Hinshaw, A. S., Feetham, S. L., & Shaver, J. L. (1999). Handbook of clinical nursing research. Thousand Oaks: Sage. [電子書]
15. Hollway, W. & Jefferson, T. (2012). Doing qualitative research differently: free association, narrative and the interview method. London: Sage.
16. ^Holmberg, B., & Godskesen, T. (2022). Dignity in bodily care at the end of life in a nursing home: an ethnographic study. BMC Geriatrics, 22(1), 593. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03244-8
17. ^Lee, T. I., Sheu, S. J., Chang, H. C., Hung, Y. T., Tseng, L. M., Chou, S. S., Liang, T, H., Liu, H. J., Lu, H. L., Chen, M. C., Liu, Y. C., Tsai, C. S., & Sun, J. C. (2019). Developing a web-based comic for newly diagnosed women with breast cancer: An action research approach. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(2), e10716. https://doi.org/10.2196/10716.
18. ^Matua, G. A., & Van Der Wal, D. M. (2015). Differentiating between descriptive and interpretive phenomenological research approaches. Nurse Researcher, 22(6), 22-27. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.6.22.e1344
19. Molloy, L., Walker, K., & Lakeman, R. (2017). Shared worlds: Multi-sited ethnography and nursing research. Nurse Researcher, 24(4), 22-26. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2017.e1506
20. Nasu, K., Sato, K., & Fukahori, H. (2020). Rebuilding and guiding a care community: A grounded theory of end-of-life nursing care practice in long-term care settings. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 76(4), 1009–1018. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14294
21. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed). Thousand Oaks: Sage. [圖資系圖書室一般圖書區 (H62 P3218 2015)]
22. ^Patton C. M. (2020). Phenomenology for the holistic nurse researcher: Underpinnings of descriptive and interpretive traditions. Journal of Holistic Nursing: official journal of the American Holistic Nurses' Association, 38(3), 278–286.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0898010119882155
23. ^SAGE Research Methods. (2015). Mixed Methods Research. http://methods.sagepub.com/video/mixed-methods-research [台大醫圖線上影視資料]
24. ^Saleh, M., Al-Amer, R., Al Ashram, S. R., Dawani, H., & Randall, S. (2020). Exploring the lived experience of Jordanian male nurses: A phenomenological study. Nursing Outlook, 68(3), 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2019.10.007
25. Strandås, M., & Bondas, T. (2018). The nurse–patient relationship as a story of health enhancement in community care: A meta-ethnography. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 74(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13389
26. Streubert, H. J. & Carpenter, D. R. (2011). Qualitative research in nursing: Advancing the humanistic imperative (5th ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
27. ^Sun, F. K., Long, A., Chiang, C. Y., & Chou, M. H. (2019). A theory to guide nursing students caring for patients with suicidal tendencies on psychiatric clinical practicum. Nurse Education in Practice, 38, 157-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2019.07.001
28. ^Sun, F. K., Long, A., Chiang, C. Y., Wu, M. K. & Yao, Y. C. (2020). The psychological processes voiced by nursing students when caring for suicidal patients during their psychiatric clinical practicum: A qualitative study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 29(3-4), 525-534. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15090
29. ^Sun, F. K., Long, A., Wu, M. K., Chiu, N. M., Hung, C. F., Tseng, Y. S. (2021). An emergent theory depicting patients’ fortitude through the healing and recovering process of depression. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association. https://doi.org/10.1177/10783903211039886.
30. Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349-35 https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
31. ^Valade, R. (2012). Ch19: Examplar: " I've waited for something like this all my life": PAR and persons with intellectual disabilities. In Munhall, P. (Ed.). Nursing Research: a Qualitative Perspective (5th ed.) (pp.471-488). MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
32. van Belle, E., Giesen, J., Conroy, T., van Mierlo, M., Vermeulen, H., Huisman-de Waal, G., & Heinen, M. (2019). Exploring person‐centred fundamental nursing care in hospital wards: A multi‐site ethnography. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 00, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15024
33. ^Wang, Y. C., Griffiths, J., & Grande, G. (2018). The influence of gender identities on body image and breast health among sexual minority women in Taiwan: Implications for healthcare practices. Sex Roles, 78, 242-254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0793-4
34. ^Wang, Y. C., Miao, N. F., Wang, F. T., & Chang, S. R. (2022). Factors associated with providers’ culturally competent care for sexual and gender minority older adults in Taiwan: A qualitative study applying the social ecological model. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 135, 104331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104331
35. ^Wilson, C. (2014). Interview Techniques for UX Practitioners: A User-Centered Design Method. Chap.5 Focus groups. [台大醫圖線上圖書-第5章, p.83-111] [補充教材]
36. Wimpenny, P., & Gass, J. (2000). Interviewing in phenomenology and grounded theory: Is there a difference? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31(6), 1485-1492. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01431.x
37. Wu, C. Y., Whitley, R., Stewart, R., & Liu, S. I. (2012). Pathways to care and help-seeking experience prior to self-harm: A qualitative study in Taiwan. Journal of Nursing Research, 20(1), 32-42. https://doi.org/10.1097/JNR.0b013e3182466e64
38. Wu, C. Y., Lin, W. H., Lee, M. B., Lin, J. Y., Huang, C. W., & Liao, S. C. (2014). Integrating suicide prevention program into clinical nursing education: A focus group study. Journal of Medical Education, 18(2), 81-91. https:/doi.org/10.6145/jme201410
39. ^Wu, C. Y., Lee, M. B., Hwang, T. J., & Chen, T. F. (2016). A focus group study exploring perceived stress and coping skills among medical and non-medical college students. Journal of Medical Education, 20(1), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.6145/jme201604
40. ^Wu, C. C., Lin, C. C., Chang, S. C., & Chou, H. L. (2019). Identifying the positive energy for retention in clinical nurses: A focus group study. Journal of Nursing Management, 27(6), 1200-1207. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12792
41. ^Zahavi, D., & Martiny, K. M. M. (2019). Phenomenology in nursing studies: New perspectives. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 93, 155-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.01.014
42. ^劉欣怡(2007).蘭嶼達悟族老人照顧關係:護理人類學民族誌.稻鄉。
|
評量方式 (僅供參考) |
No. |
項目 |
百分比 |
說明 |
1. |
Participation and Discussion |
25% |
Participation and Discussion |
2. |
Major Topic Presentation |
30% |
Major Topic Presentation |
3. |
Critical Review |
15% |
Critical Review (1 article)
(Due date : 4/19) |
4. |
Final Report |
30% |
Proposal Presentation(10%) and Term paper(20%)
(Due date : 6/7) |
|
針對學生困難提供學生調整方式 |
上課形式 |
以錄音輔助, 以錄影輔助, 提供學生彈性出席課程方式 |
作業繳交方式 |
延長作業繳交期限, 書面報告取代口頭報告, 個人報告取代團體報告, 學生與授課老師協議改以其他形式呈現 |
考試形式 |
|
其他 |
由師生雙方議定 |
|
週次 |
日期 |
單元主題 |
第1週 |
02/22 |
Course overview |
第2週 |
03/01 |
Philosophical approach and research process |
第3週 |
03/08 |
Foundations, conduct of qualitative research |
第4週 |
03/15 |
Ethnography & Strategies and observation methods |
第5週 |
03/22 |
Phenomenology |
第6週 |
03/29 |
Grounded Theory |
第7週 |
04/05 |
Action Research |
第8週 |
04/12 |
~National Holiday~ |
第9週 |
04/19 |
Focus group & Critical review DUE |
第10週 |
04/26 |
Mixed method |
第11週 |
05/03 |
Qualitative research experience sharing |
第12週 |
05/10 |
Presentation (I-1): Qualitative research framework and design |
第13週 |
05/17 |
Presentation (I-2): Data generation and analysis |
第14週 |
5/24 |
Presentation (II-1): Qualitative research framework and design |
第15週 |
5/31 |
Presentation (II-2): Data generation and analysis |
第16週 |
6/7 |
Final evaluation & paper due |
|