|
課程名稱 |
藥品資訊討論
DRUG INFORMATION DISCUSSION |
|
開課學期 |
97-1 |
|
授課對象 |
醫學院 臨床藥學研究所 |
|
授課教師 |
林慧玲 |
|
課號 |
CliPhm5005 |
|
課程識別碼 |
451 U0600 |
|
班次 |
|
|
學分 |
2 |
|
全/半年 |
半年 |
|
必/選修 |
選修 |
|
上課時間 |
星期五3,4(10:20~12:10) |
|
上課地點 |
臨藥討論室 |
|
備註 |
限本所學生及藥學系所學生選課。與何蘊芳、沈麗娟、林淑文合開
總人數上限：15人 |
|
|
|
|
課程簡介影片 |
|
|
核心能力關聯 |
本課程尚未建立核心能力關連 |
|
課程大綱
|
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
|
課程概述 |
一、課程簡介:
1. Introduction to and definition of drug information
2. Role of pharmacist in provision of drug information
3. Function of the drug information center
4. Resources and retrieval of drug information
5. How to answer/present drug information question
6. Presentation of exercise I，Presentation of assignment II: drug information question
7. Presentation of assignment II: drug information question
8. P&T committee
9. Evaluation of electronic information
10. Presentation of assignment III: Web information
11. Drug literature evaluation I
12. Drug literature evaluation II
13. Evaluation of clinical trial reports (I)
14. Evaluation of clinical trial reports (II)
15. Evaluation of quality of pharmaceutical products.
16. Pharmacists and EBM
17. Diagnostic procedure in EBM
18. Meta-analysis
19. Research design and writing scientific paper
20. The publication process: editors, referees, etc.
21. Presentation of assignment IV: Clinical practice guideline, evidence-based medicine
22. Presentation of assignment IV: Clinical practice guideline, evidence-based medicine
|
|
課程目標 |
學生能成為醫療體系及藥委會中，正確藥品資訊的提供者及評估者，並學會學術論文之撰寫
After the course, students will be able to provide unbiased and evaluated drug information to the health delivery system and P&T committee. They also need to know how to write scientific papers. |
|
課程要求 |
|
|
預期每週課後學習時數 |
|
|
Office Hours |
|
|
指定閱讀 |
|
|
參考書目 |
1. Malone PM, Mosdelll KW, Kier KL, Stanovich JE. Drug information – a guide for pharmacists, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001.
2. Sackett DL, Straus SE, Ricbardson WS, Rosenberg W, Hynes RB. Evidence-based medicine – how to practice and teach EBM, 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2000. |
|
評量方式
(僅供參考) |
|
|