課程資訊
課程名稱
方法論
Methodology 
開課學期
112-2 
授課對象
管理學院  商學研究所  
授課教師
許士軍 
課號
MBA8006 
課程識別碼
741 D0150 
班次
 
學分
3.0 
全/半年
半年 
必/選修
選修 
上課時間
星期一2,3,4(9:10~12:10) 
上課地點
管一403 
備註
限管理學院學生(含輔系、雙修生) 且 限碩士班以上
總人數上限:20人 
 
課程簡介影片
 
核心能力關聯
本課程尚未建立核心能力關連
課程大綱
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
課程概述

本科目乃配合博士班同學從事理論研究之需要而開設,此種研究乃建立於科學研究方法上,因此其內容乃依照一般科學研究步驟給予有系統之討論。但對於理論,研究與方法間之關係將加重視。主要講題包括科學研究之邏輯與性質,理論建構與研究,假設發展與驗證,衡量理論及方法、研究設計及實施、資料分析及解釋等。 

課程目標
本科目乃配合博士班同學從事理論研究之需要而開設,此種研究乃建立於科學研究方法上,因此其內容乃依照一般科學研究步驟給予有系統之討論。但對於理論,研究與方法間之關係將加重視。主要講題包括科學研究之邏輯與性質,理論建構與研究,假設發展與驗證,衡量理論及方法、研究設計及實施、資料分析及解釋等。
This course is designed specifically for preparing and assisting the doctoral students undertaking their dissertation research as required by the degree program. The contents of the course are structured in accordance with that of the methodologies of scientific research. Emphasis is placed upon the relations among theory construction, research methods and techniques. 
課程要求
先修科目: 統計學 
預期每週課後學習時數
1. Introduce to Social Science Research
Text:Ch 1
B & B (7):Ch 1
Baldridge, D.C., S.W.Floyd and L. Markocry,2004 “ Are Managers from Mars and Academicians from Venus? Toward an Understanding of the Relationship between Academic Quality and Practical Relevance.” Strategic Management Journal, 25, 1063-74.

2. The Meaning of Theory and Its Role in Research
LIN (41):Ch 2

3. Theory Construction & Paradigm
LIN (41):Ch 3
B & B(7):Ch 2
BLA(8):Ch 1
Weick (57)

4. Research Problems and Hypothesis
Text:Ch 2
KR (38):Ch 2
DN (22):Ch 4


5. Constructs, Variables, and Relations
Text: Chs 3,5
KR (38): Ch3

6. Measurement and Scaling Methods
Text:Chs 26,27 &28
B & B (7):Ch 3
LIN (41):Ch 10

7. Research Design (1)
Text: Chs18&19
KR(38): Ch17

8. Research Design (2)
Text:Chs 20&23

9. Qualitative Research
Text:Ch24, pp.588-593
Jack (1979) (34)
Morgan & Smircich (1980) (45)
Strauss & Corbin (1980) (55)

10. Case Study Research
Eisenhardt (1989) (26)
Yin (1984) (61)

11. Survey Research
Text:Ch 25

12. Data Analysis
Text:Ch9, 13-16
Davis, J. A. (1985), The Logic of Causal Order, Newbury Park, CA:Sage (23)
B & B (7):Ch 5
BC (14):Chs 2 & 3

13. Comparative Research
「專題訪談-世紀之交、人文社會的樣態」
受訪人:葉啟政,黃光國
淡江人文社會學刊五十週年校慶特刊(89.1)PP.95-120
BR(12):Ch 1
HSU:從比較觀點探討中國式管理理論之發展
Earleys Singh:“ International and Intercultural Management Research:What’s Next?”
AMJ , V.38, N.2 (April 1995),327- 40

14. Research Ethics
Text:Ch 17
Donald Kennedy, Academic Duty, Harvard University Press, 1997
(中譯本:楊振富譯,<學術這一行>第八章:誠實為上,第255-292)

15. Presentation and Style: The Chicago Manual Craft:Chs 11-15
 
Office Hours
另約時間 
指定閱讀
指定用書:
Chava Frankfort-Nachmias, David Nachmias and Jack DeWaard, Research Methods in the Social Sciences, 8th ed. Worth, 2014. 
參考書目
1. Adler, N. J., R. Doktor, and S. G. Redding, (1988), “From the Atlantic to the Pacific Century:Cross Cultural Management Reviewed. ” in Organizational Science Abroad. by C. A. B. Osigweh, Yg.. N. Y. Plenum Press, 27-54.

2. Baker, T. L. (1994), Doing Social Research 2nd ed, N. Y.:McGraw-Hill.

3. Becker, H. S. (2020), Writing for Social Scientists 3rd ed. Chicago:the University of Chicago Press.

4. Behling, O. (1980), “ The Case for Natural Science Model for Research In Organizational Behavior and Organizational Theory, ” Academy of Management Review, 5, 483-90.

5. Berry, W. D., and M. S. Lewis-Beck, eds. (1986), New Tools for Social Scientists:Advances and Applications in Research Methods. Beverly Hills,CA:Sage.

6. Blalock, A. B. and H. M. Blalock, Jr. (1982), Introduction to Social Research. 2nd ed.. Prentice-Hall.(B & B )

7. Blalock, H. M. Jr., (1964), Causal Inferences in Nonexperiment Research. Prentice-Hall. (BLA)

8. Bohrnstedt, G. W., and E. F. Borgatta, (1991), Social Measurement:Current Issues. Beverly Hills, CA:Sage, (BO)

9. Booth, W. C., G. G. Colomb, and G. M. Williams, (1995), The Craft of Research. Chicago:The University of Chicago Press. (CR)

10. Brislin, R. W., W. J. Lonner , and R. M. Morndike (1973), Cross-Cultural Research Methods. N. Y.:John Wiley&Sons, (BR)

11. Britt, D. W. 1997, A Conceptual Introduction to Modeling:Qualitative and QuantitativePerspectives. Mahwah, N. J. LEA. (BD)

12. Bryman, A., and D. Cramer (1990), Quantitative Data Analysis for Social Scientists. London:Routledge. (BC)

13. The Chicago Manual of Style (2019), 17th ed., Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.

14. Coffey, A. and P. Atkinson (1996), Making Sense of Qualitative Data:Complementary Research Strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.

15. Cohen, M. R., and E. Nagel, (1934), An Introduction to Logic and Scientific Method. London:Routledge & Kegan.

16. Crabtree, B. F., and W. L. Miller, eds. (1992), Doing Qualitative Research. London:Sage.

17. Davis, J. A.,(1985), The Logic of Causal Order. Newbury Park, CA:Sage.

18. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989), “Building Theories form Case Study Research,” Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-50.

19. Feldman, S. P. (1986), “Management in Context:An Essay on the Relevance of Culture to the Understanding of Organizational Change,” Journal of Management Studies, 23, 6.

20. Fielding, N. G., and R. M. Lee, eds. (1992), Using Computers in Qualitative Research. London:Sage.

21. Girden, Ellen R. (1996), Evaluating Research Articles:From Start to Finish. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.

22. Greer, S. (1969), The Logic of Social Inquiry. Aldine. (GR)

23. Hacking, I. (1965), Logic of Statistical Inference. Cambridge University Press, (HKG)

24. Hantrais, L. and S. Mangen, eds. (1996), Cross-National Research Methods in the Social Sciences. London:Pinter.

25. Joropensen, Danny L.(1989), Participant Observation: A Methdology for Human Studies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage

26. Judd, C. M., E. R. Smith, and L. H. Kidder, (1991), Research Methods in Social Relations, 6th ed.. Fort Worth:Harcourt Brace Jovanovith.

27. Kaplan, Abraham (1968), The Conduct of Inquiry. N. T.:Harper & Row

28. Kerlinger, F. N. (1999), Foundations of Behavioral Research, Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

29. Kuhn, T. S.(1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.

30. Lakatos, I. (1978), The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

31. Lin, N. (1976), Foundations of Social Research. McGraw-Hill. (LIN)

32. Lonner, W., and J. Berry, (1986), eds., Field Methods in Cross-Culture Research. Beverly Hills,CA:Sage.

33. Maxwell, J. A. (1996), Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage.

34. Mitroff, I.M.(1974), The Subjective Side of Science. N.Y.:Elsevice

35. Morgan, G., and L. Smircich, (1980) “The Case for Qualitative Research,” Academy of Management Review, 5, 491-500.

36. Neuman, W. L. (2009), Social Research Methods:Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, 7rd ed., Pearson.

37. Newton-Smith, W. H., (1981), The Rationality of Science. Boston:Routledge & Kegan.

38. Nunnally, Jr., J. C., (1970), Introduction to Psychological Measurement. McGraw-Hill. (NU)

39. O’ Connor, D. J., and B. Carr, (1982), Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge. Brighton, Sussex:The Harvestu. (OC)

40. Rea, L. M., and R. A. Parker, (1992), Designing and Conducting Survey Research:A Comprehensive Guide. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.

41. Smircich, L. (1983), “Concepts of Culture and Organizational Analysis,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 339-58.
42. Steward, D.&P. Shovemdasani(1990),Focus Group: Theory and Practice. Newburry CA:Sage

43. Strauss, A. L. (1987), Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

44. Corbin, J. and A, Strauss, (2014), Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory . SAGE.

45. Weick, K. E. (1989), “Theory Construction as Disciplined Imagination,” Academy of Management Review, 14, 516-31.

46. Whitley, R. (1990), “East Asian Enterprise Structures and the Comparative Analysis of Forms of Business Organization, ” Organization Studies, 11 (1).

47. Wilkins, A., and G. Dyer, Jr., (1989), “Toward Culturally Sensitive Theories of Culture Change, ” Academy of Management Review, 13 (4)

48. Williams, J. M. (1990), Style:Toward Clarity and Grace. Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.

49. Yin, R. (1984), Case Study Research:Design and Methods. Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.

50. Zaltman, G., K. Lemasters, and M. Heffring, (1982), Theory Construction in Marketing. N. Y. :John Wiley & Sons.

51. 蕭瑞麟(2017) <不用數字的研究 :質性研究的思辯脈絡>五南 
評量方式
(僅供參考)
   
課程進度
週次
日期
單元主題
無資料