課程資訊
課程名稱
學術邏輯表達力
Logic Your Way into Writing 
開課學期
113-2 
授課對象
 寫作教學中心  
授課教師
柯凱彣 
課號
Write7018 
課程識別碼
Q01EM0390 
班次
 
學分
3.0 
全/半年
半年 
必/選修
選修 
上課時間
星期四6,7,8(13:20~16:20) 
上課地點
共405 
備註
本課程以英語授課。
限碩士班以上
總人數上限:17人 
 
課程簡介影片
 
核心能力關聯
本課程尚未建立核心能力關連
課程大綱
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
課程概述

Many students and researchers find it challenging to articulate their research in a way that is both intuitive and convincing, especially in a cross-disciplinary context. This course is designed to equip students with the skills to write more clearly, making it easier for their audience to grasp their ideas. It will also train students to provide sufficient support for the direct and indirect arguments they make in their research and academic writing. These writing skills will be put into practice in this course, particularly in the creation of effective Personal Statements and general proposals, preparing students for real-world applications.

This course will not only enhance students' writing skills but also sharpen their critical thinking abilities. Students will learn to analyze, create, and support arguments in their academic writing, fostering a deeper understanding of their research topics. The goal is to produce well-presented, logical writing in the context of a research article and persuasive writing in general. Additionally, the course will focus on writing clarity, style, and flow, providing a comprehensive approach to academic writing.

Emphasis will also be placed on communicating research through both speaking and writing to facilitate understanding and communication. This will involve conducting audience/reader analysis, using more active sentence constructions, incorporating syntactic and semantic clarity, utilizing progression and transition strategies, and evaluating overall language and jargon usage.

In addition, students will learn to develop their critical reading skills to present and support research arguments in writing. Critical reading will involve multiple ways of evaluating academic arguments for clarity and logic while also identifying any logic and argument shortcomings in students' own writing.

This course primarily focuses on Informal logic and Deductive and Inductive critical thinking skills. These elements of logic will be focused on and adapted for an academic writing and oral communication setting.

This class will be a dynamic learning experience, conducted through a blend of lecture and group work. While each class will have a lecture component, the course heavily relies on group work to allow students to apply the content presented in class. This interactive approach fosters the exchange of ideas and opinions, enhancing the learning experience. Students will engage in class tasks and activities, and also provide peer feedback to each other, focusing on the effectiveness of their communication of research, thought process, and arguments.

This course will be taught entirely in English and will focus on writing in the sciences and the humanities. 

課程目標
This course aims to develop students’ ability to use critical reading, logic, and standard rhetorical functions in organizing and writing for academic, research, and popular writing. The course focuses on specific rhetorical writing skills such as definition, description, and argumentation. Major written assignments in this course will incorporate these rhetorical strategies, logical progression, and clear and descriptive style to communicate students’ research to a cross-disciplinary audience. The instructional means adopted in this course include lectures, discussion, and hands-on practice.

By the end of the course, students will be able to:
1. Critically evaluate and analyze a variety of texts for academic purposes.
2. Identify features of academic writing in the sciences and the humanities and apply the knowledge of academic writing to organize ideas into a logical and coherent text.
3. Utilize writing and rhetorical strategies for coherence and concision
4. Critique an Editorial or Academic article by identifying fallacies and unclear/unsound logic and writing in a way that is understandable and clear for a more general audience
5. Evaluate writing for clarity
6. Formulate academic arguments that are well supported through writing using concepts of Aristotelian logic
7. Develop proof-reading and self-editing skills
8. Present their research in both writing and speaking to a cross-disciplinary/multidisciplinary audience and increase the intelligibility of their research by utilizing content design and rhetorical strategies. 
課程要求
• Class attendance and participation is required. If you are absent for more than 3 classes in a semester, or are often late and/or leave early, your final course grade may be negatively impacted

• Lectures are presented in English. All student work will be submitted in English. In class discussions should be conducted for the most part in English

• This course is not open to undergraduates or auditors

• Although we do not evaluate English levels, students will need to self-evaluate their ability to determine if they have a sufficient level.

• All materials are in English. If students need help with advanced grammar for academic writing, I recommend taking the AWEC’s Fundamentals of English Writing class before taking this class.


• Late assignments will not be accepted 
預期每週課前或/與課後學習時數
This primary workload for this course is 2 papers (2-3 drafts each), 2 debates, and 2 presentations.

While this might sound like a lot, much of the work is progressive, meaning it builds off of each other. For instance, for each of our papers, the first draft is not going to be a full draft. Instead it will be an outline of the main ideas, where you will get feedback from your classmates and the instructor, before you write a full draft for the second draft, etc...

While there are 2 presentations for this course, each presentation is relatively short at 3 minutes

In addition to the major assignments, there will be small writing assignments every week. Writing is a skill that need to be developed through doing. Thus, each week there will be a short writing assignment (200 words or less typically) to practice a strategy or principle of logical and clear writing that we cover in class. 
Office Hours
另約時間 
指定閱讀
Readings will be provided by the instructor
 
參考書目
- Browne, M. N., & Keeley, S. M. (2007). Asking the right questions: A guide to critical thinking. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Bowling Green State University.

- Glasman-Deal, H. (2016). Science research writing: For non-native speakers of English. London: Imperial College Press.

- Moore, B. N., & Parker, R. B. (2015). Critical thinking. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

- Minto, B. (2010). The pyramid principle: Logic in writing and thinking. London: Financial Times Prentice Hall.

- Morrow, D.R., Weston, A. (2015) A Workbook for Arguments: A complete course in critical thinking, 2nd Edition. Indianapolis, IN.: Hackett Publishing Company.

- Pyrczak, F., & Bruce, R. R. (2017). Writing empirical research reports: A basic guide for students of the social and behavioral sciences. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

- Redman, P., & Maples, W. (2017). Good essay writing: A social sciences guide. London: SAGE Publications in association with the Open University.

- Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2017). Academic writing for graduate students: essential tasks and skills. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. 
評量方式
(僅供參考)
 
No.
項目
百分比
說明
1. 
HW Assignments  
10% 
Various small assignments throughout the semester  
2. 
Life Raft Paper  
15% 
A persuasive document arguing for why your field deserves the last spot on a lifeboat. In this paper you will argue why your field is necessary for the survival of mankind after Armageddon  
3. 
Life Raft Presentation  
5% 
An oral presentation of your paper to an audience  
4. 
Statement of Purpose  
20% 
An academic statement of purpose or business personal statement. The goal of this paper is to persuade the reader that you are deserving of serious consideration for whatever school/program/business you decide to focus on for this paper  
5. 
Debate 1  
10% 
A team forensic debate where each teach will be given time to gather facts and research to use in a debate  
6. 
Debate 2  
20% 
A team forensic debate where each teach will be given time to gather facts and research to use in a debate  
7. 
3 Minute Thesis Presentation  
10% 
A 3 minute presentation of your graduate research aimed at a general audience  
8. 
Participation 
10% 
Attendance, class participation, and a variety of other variables  
  1. 本校尚無訂定 A+ 比例上限。
  2. 本校採用等第制評定成績,學生成績評量辦法中的百分制分數區間與單科成績對照表僅供參考,授課教師可依等第定義調整分數區間。詳見學習評量專區 (連結)。
 
課程進度
週次
日期
單元主題
第1週
2/20  - Course Introduction
- What is Critical Thinking?
- Introduction to Critical thinking: Conclusion and Premise  
第2週
2/27  - Identifying Conclusion and Premise(s)
- Writing: Cohesion and Progression Patterns  
第3週
3/06  - Argument Mapping
- Public Speaking  
第4週
3/13  - Argument Mapping: Continued
- Fallacies of Irrelevance and Ambiguity  
第5週
3/20  - Fallacies Involving Unwarranted Assumptions
- Persuasive Writing
- Message Box Approach to Persuasive Communication  
第6週
3/27  - Writing: Mechanics, Grammar + Style
- Logical Fallacies Continued
- Ambiguity  
第7週
4/03  - Persuasive Arguments into Persuasive Writing
- Developing and Supporting Arguments continued 
第8週
4/10  Persuasive Writing: Peer Review
- Logical transitions and connectors 
第9週
4/17  - Debate Prep
- Probability and specificity 
第10週
4/24  - Supporting arguments with examples & statistics
- Delivering oral Arguments 
第11週
5/01  - Debate 1
- Lifeboat Paper: Peer Review  
第12週
5/08  - Critical Thinking in Critiquing Academic Research  
第13週
5/15  - Supporting arguments: Continued
- 3 Minute Thesis  
第14週
5/22  - Debate Preparation
- 3 Minute Thesis: Continued  
第15週
5/29  - Debate preparation
 
第16週
6/5  - Debate 2