課程名稱 |
性別歷史與法律專題研究一 SEMINAR ON GENDER,HISTORY AND THE LAW(I) |
開課學期 |
94-1 |
授課對象 |
法律學院 法律研究所 |
授課教師 |
陳昭如 |
課號 |
LAW7301 |
課程識別碼 |
A21 M8210 |
班次 |
|
學分 |
2 |
全/半年 |
半年 |
必/選修 |
選修 |
上課時間 |
星期五3,4(10:20~12:10) |
上課地點 |
社法研3 |
備註 |
|
Ceiba 課程網頁 |
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/941genderhistorylaw |
課程簡介影片 |
|
核心能力關聯 |
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖 |
課程大綱
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
課程概述 |
這是一門探究性別、歷史與法律的交錯領域的課程。
我們首先將由讀理論作品開始,分別探討如何從性別
的觀點來思考法律、在歷史的縱深中探討法律、以性
別作為分析歷史的範疇,以及如何從性別的角度來探
究法律的歷史。其次,則從以下三個個別領域,來探
究性別、歷史與法律的交錯關係:投票權(suffrage)、
婚姻與家庭,以及對女性的暴力(violence against women)。 |
課程目標 |
這門課的文本為英美的研究,但非常強調批判性比較
觀點的重要性。所有的文本均為英文,但心得與期末
報告必須以華文寫成。這樣做的目的是希望同學們能
夠透過翻譯/ 轉譯的過程,思辯西方作品與本土脈絡
的關係。 |
課程要求 |
修課同學每週必須繳交1-2頁的讀書心得,內容應包括
該週文本的簡單摘要、感想評論,以及 — 尤為重要
的 — 討論意見(discussion questions),至少必
須提出一個討論意見。讀書心得應於每週四下午五點
之前e-mail繳交。逾時不候。至多得缺交三次。
本學期的課程強調engaging with the texts,因此
不要求獨立研究式的報告。期末應繳交至少一萬兩千
字之文獻回顧報告(review essay),主題自訂(例
如:「差異」的歷史形構),報告之撰寫必須運用課
堂之文本。 |
預期每週課後學習時數 |
|
Office Hours |
每週二 15:30~17:30 備註: 法律學院研究大樓206室 |
參考書目 |
|
指定閱讀 |
|
評量方式 (僅供參考) |
No. |
項目 |
百分比 |
說明 |
1. |
課堂參與和讀書心得 |
50% |
|
2. |
期末報告 |
50% |
|
|
週次 |
日期 |
單元主題 |
第1週 |
9/23 |
Introduction |
第2週 |
9/30 |
Thinking about Gender and the Law
• Catharine A. MacKinnon, “On Exceptionality: Women as Women in Law,” Feminism Unmodified (MA: Harvard, 1987), pp. 70-80
• Deborah L. Rhode, “Feminist Critical Theories,” 42 Stan. L. Rev. 616 (1990)
• Kimberle Crenshaw, “Traffic at the Crossroads: Multiple Oppressions,” in Robin Morgan ed., Sisterhood is Forever (NY: WSP, 2003), pp. 43-57
|
第4週 |
10/14 |
Thinking about Law and History
• Christopher Tomlins, “History in the American Juridical Field: Narrative, Justification, and Explanation,” 16 Yale J.L. & Human. 323 (2004)
• Joan Williams, “Culture and Certainty: Legal History and the Reconstructive Project,” 76 Va. L. Rev. 713 (1990) |
第5週 |
10/21 |
Thinking about Gender, History and the Law
• Catharine A. MacKinnon, “Does Sexuality Have a History?” Women’s Lives, Men’s Laws (MA: Harvard, 2005), pp. 269-276
• Joan Hoff, Law, Gender & Injustice (NY: New York University Press, 1991), pp. 1-20
• Pamela D. Bridgewater, “Connectedness and Closeted Questions: The Use of History in Developing Feminist Legal Theory,” 11 Wis. Women’s L.J. 351 (1997) |
第6週 |
10/28 |
Voting Rights and the Politics of Difference
• Joan W. Scott, "Deconstructing Equality-versus-Difference: Or, the Uses of Poststructuralist Theory for Feminism," Feminist Studies 14.1 (1988): 33-50.
• Joan W. Scott, Only Paradoxes to Offer: French Feminists and the Rights of Man. (MA: Harvard University Press, 1996), pp. 1-18, 161-75 |
第7週 |
11/04 |
Locating the independent suffrage movement in the present
• Reva Siegel, “She the People: The Nineteenth Amendment, Sex Equality, Federalism, and the Family,” 115 Harvard Law Review 1 (2002) |
第8週 |
11/11 |
The color of women’s suffrage
• Lebsock, Suzanne. "Woman Suffrage and White Supremacy: A Virginia Case Study," in Visible Women: New Essays on American Activism, Nancy Hewitt and Suzanne Lebsock, eds. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1993
• Philip N Cohen, “Nationalism and Suffrage: Gender Struggling in Nation-building America,” SIGN 21:3, pp. 707-27 (1996) |
第9週 |
11/18 |
Marriage, Family and the Nation
• Nancy Cott, , Public vows: a History of Marriage and the Nation (MA.: Harvard University Press, 2000), pp.1-8, 132-55, 200-27 |
第10週 |
11/25 |
The Regulatory Power of Marriage through Law
• Ariela R. Dubler, “In the shadow of marriage: Single women and the legal construction of the family and the state,” 112 Yale L. J. 1641 (2003) |
第11週 |
12/02 |
The Historical Formation and Transformation of Domesticity
• Joan Williams, “From Difference to Dominance to Domesticity: Care as Work, Gender as Tradition,” 76 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 1441 (2000-2001)
|
第12週 |
12/09 |
Naming and Power
• Leissner, Omi Morgenstern, “Naming the Unheard of,” 15 Nat’l Black L. J. 109 (1997-1998)
|
第13週 |
12/16 |
Wanted or Unwanted Sex? Marital Rape Through historical lenses
• Hasday, Jill Elaine, “Contest and Consent: a Legal History of Marital Rape,” 88 Calif. L. Rev. 1373 (2000)
|
第14週 |
12/23 |
Still unprotected: The transformation of domestic violence
• Reva Siegel, “‘The Rule of Love’: Wife Beating as Prerogative and Privacy,” 105 Yale L. J. 2117 (1996)
|
第15週 |
12/30 |
Violence against “Minority and Women”?
• Jordan, Emma Coleman, “Crossing the River of Blood between Us: Lynching, Violence, Beauty, and the Paradox of Feminist History,” 3 J. Gender Race & Just. 545 (2000)
|
第16週 |
1/06 |
The VAWA debate and the usefulness of history
• Serena Mayeri, "A common fate of discrimination": Race-gender analogies in legal and historical perspective,” 110 Yale L. J. 1045 (2001).
|
|